Literature DB >> 25677982

Variation in risk and mortality of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a multicenter study.

Nattachai Srisawat1, Florentina E Sileanu, Raghavan Murugan, Rinaldo Bellomod, Paolo Calzavacca, Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba, Dinna Cruz, Judith Finn, Eric E J Hoste, Kianoush Kashani, Claudio Ronco, Steve Webb, John A Kellum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite standardized definitions of acute kidney injury (AKI), there is wide variation in the reported rates of AKI and hospital mortality for patients with AKI. Variation could be due to actual differences in disease incidence, clinical course, or a function of data ascertainment and application of diagnostic criteria. Using standard criteria may help determine and compare the risk and outcomes of AKI across centers.
METHODS: In this cohort study of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care units at six hospitals in four countries, we used KDIGO criteria to define AKI. The main outcomes were the occurrence of AKI and hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 15,132 critically ill patients, 32% developed AKI based on serum creatinine criteria. After adjusting for differences in age, sex, and severity of illness, the odds ratio for AKI continued to vary across centers (odds ratio (OR), 2.57-6.04, p < 0.001). The overall, crude hospital mortality of patients with AKI was 27%, which also varied across centers after adjusting for KDIGO stage, differences in age, sex, and severity of illness (OR, 1.13-2.20, p < 0.001). The severity of AKI was associated with incremental mortality risk across centers.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the absolute and severity-adjusted rates of AKI and hospital mortality rates for AKI varied across centers. Future studies should examine whether variation in the risk of AKI among centers is due to differences in clinical practice or process of care or residual confounding due to unmeasured factors.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25677982     DOI: 10.1159/000371748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  32 in total

1.  Measuring acute kidney injury around the world: are we using the right thermometer (and adequately)?

Authors:  Miet Schetz; Michael Darmon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Did KDIGO guidelines on acute kidney injury improve patient outcome?

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; Jill Vanmassenhove; Andrew Lewington
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [New kidney function tests: Renal functional reserve and furosemide stress test].

Authors:  D Kindgen-Milles; T Slowinski; T Dimski
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  No increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury in a population-based annual temporal trends epidemiology study.

Authors:  Kianoush Kashani; Min Shao; Guangxi Li; Amy W Williams; Andrew D Rule; Walter K Kremers; Michael Malinchoc; Ognjen Gajic; John C Lieske
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Recovery after Critical Illness and Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Anitha Vijayan; Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Kathleen D Liu; Stuart L Goldstein; Anupam Agarwal; Mark D Okusa; Jorge Cerda
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 10.614

6.  Accelerated-strategy renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Huan Lan; Chih-Cheng Lai; Shen-Peng Chang; Li-Chin Lu; Shun-Hsing Hung; Wei-Ting Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Overview of Diagnostic Criteria and Epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Disease in the Critically Ill Patient.

Authors:  Bethany C Birkelo; Neesh Pannu; Edward D Siew
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 10.614

8.  A decrease in serum creatinine after ICU admission is associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Hye Ran Kang; Si Nae Lee; Yun Ju Cho; Jin Seok Jeon; Hyunjin Noh; Dong Cheol Han; Suyeon Park; Soon Hyo Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quality Improvement Goals for Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Kianoush Kashani; Mitchell Howard Rosner; Michael Haase; Andrew J P Lewington; Donal J O'Donoghue; F Perry Wilson; Mitra K Nadim; Samuel A Silver; Alexander Zarbock; Marlies Ostermann; Ravindra L Mehta; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Xiaoqiang Ding; Peter Pickkers; Azra Bihorac; Edward D Siew; Erin F Barreto; Etienne Macedo; John A Kellum; Paul M Palevsky; Ashita Jiwat Tolwani; Claudio Ronco; Luis A Juncos; Oleksa G Rewa; Sean M Bagshaw; Theresa Ann Mottes; Jay L Koyner; Kathleen D Liu; Lui G Forni; Michael Heung; Vin-Cent Wu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 10.  Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit: update 2017 : Expert opinion of the Working Group on Prevention, AKI section, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  M Joannidis; W Druml; L G Forni; A B J Groeneveld; P M Honore; E Hoste; M Ostermann; H M Oudemans-van Straaten; M Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.