Literature DB >> 25677813

Introducing the Quill™ device for modified sleeve circumcision with subcutaneous suture: a retrospective study of 70 cases.

Chaohui Gu1, Fengyan Tian, Zhankui Jia, Guanru Li, Zhenglei Meng, Weizhi Xing, Yafei Ding, Zhibo Jin, Quancheng Kan, Jinjian Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of treatment for male circumcision using modified sleeve circumcision and subcuticular suture with the Quill™ device.
METHODS: From May 2011 to March 2012, 70 consecutive cases of male circumcision were performed using an alternative technique with the Quill™ device by a single surgeon in our institution. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection process of this procedure were the same as for conventional circumcision. We evaluated the indications and perioperative outcomes. The circumcisions were performed as day-case procedures under local anesthesia.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3-6 months. The ages ranged from 8 to 68 (mean = 27.0 years, SD = 10). The indications for surgery were either cosmetic (n = 16, 22.9%) or medical [redundant prepuce (n = 36, 51.4%), phimosis (n = 5, 7.1%), paraphimosis (n = 2, 2.9%), balanoposthitis (n = 9, 12.9%), melanoma (n = 1, 1.4%), and condyloma acuminata (n = 1, 1.4%)] (n = 54, 77.1%). The mean operation time in this group was 29 min (19-38 min) when the Quill™ device was used. In all, 3 cases developed complications (4.3%). The final cosmetic result was satisfactory for both the patients and their spouses or parents.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that modified sleeve circumcision and subcuticular suture were safe and reliable surgical methods of circumcision that provide a better cosmetic result. 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25677813     DOI: 10.1159/000368660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  2 in total

1.  Can circumcision be avoided in adult male with phimosis? Results of the PhimoStopTM prospective trial.

Authors:  Marco Carilli; Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Serena Pastore; Stefano Germani; Luca Orecchia; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-11

Review 2.  Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhong-Chao Huo; Gang Liu; Xiao-Yan Li; Fei Liu; Wen-Ju Fan; Ru-Hua Guan; Pei-Feng Li; De-Yang Mo; Yong-Zhi He
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.