BACKGROUND: The European Commission and Patients Organizations identify rare disease registries (RDRs) as strategic instruments to develop research and improve knowledge in the field of rare diseases. Interoperability between RDRs is needed for research activities, validation of therapeutic treatments, and public health actions. Sharing and comparing information requires a uniform and standardized way of data collection, so levels of interconnection between RDRs with similar aims and/or nature of data should be identified. The objective of this study is to define a classification and characterization of RDRs in order to identify different profiles and informative needs. METHODS: Exploratory statistical analyses (cluster analysis and random forest) were applied to data derived from the EPIRARE project ('Building Consensus and Synergies for the EU Rare Disease Patient Registration') survey on the activities and needs of RDRs. RESULTS: The cluster analysis identified 3 main typologies of RDRs: public health, clinical and genetic research, and treatment registries. The analysis of the most informative variables, identified by the random forest method, led to the characterization of 3 types of RDRs and the definition of different profiles and informative needs. CONCLUSIONS: These results represent a useful source of information to facilitate the harmonization and interconnection of RDRs in accordance with the different profiles identified. It could help sharing the information between RDRs with similar profiles and, whenever possible, interconnections between registries with different profiles.
BACKGROUND: The European Commission and Patients Organizations identify rare disease registries (RDRs) as strategic instruments to develop research and improve knowledge in the field of rare diseases. Interoperability between RDRs is needed for research activities, validation of therapeutic treatments, and public health actions. Sharing and comparing information requires a uniform and standardized way of data collection, so levels of interconnection between RDRs with similar aims and/or nature of data should be identified. The objective of this study is to define a classification and characterization of RDRs in order to identify different profiles and informative needs. METHODS: Exploratory statistical analyses (cluster analysis and random forest) were applied to data derived from the EPIRARE project ('Building Consensus and Synergies for the EU Rare Disease Patient Registration') survey on the activities and needs of RDRs. RESULTS: The cluster analysis identified 3 main typologies of RDRs: public health, clinical and genetic research, and treatment registries. The analysis of the most informative variables, identified by the random forest method, led to the characterization of 3 types of RDRs and the definition of different profiles and informative needs. CONCLUSIONS: These results represent a useful source of information to facilitate the harmonization and interconnection of RDRs in accordance with the different profiles identified. It could help sharing the information between RDRs with similar profiles and, whenever possible, interconnections between registries with different profiles.
Authors: M K Javaid; L Forestier-Zhang; L Watts; A Turner; C Ponte; H Teare; D Gray; N Gray; R Popert; J Hogg; J Barrett; R Pinedo-Villanueva; C Cooper; R Eastell; N Bishop; R Luqmani; P Wordsworth; J Kaye Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Daphne H Schoenmakers; Shanice Beerepoot; Sibren van den Berg; Laura Adang; Annette Bley; Jaap-Jan Boelens; Francesca Fumagalli; Wim G Goettsch; Sabine Grønborg; Samuel Groeschel; Peter M van Hasselt; Carla E M Hollak; Caroline Lindemans; Fanny Mochel; Peter G M Mol; Caroline Sevin; Ayelet Zerem; Ludger Schöls; Nicole I Wolf Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Yllka Kodra; Jérôme Weinbach; Manuel Posada-de-la-Paz; Alessio Coi; S Lydie Lemonnier; David van Enckevort; Marco Roos; Annika Jacobsen; Ronald Cornet; S Faisal Ahmed; Virginie Bros-Facer; Veronica Popa; Marieke Van Meel; Daniel Renault; Rainald von Gizycki; Michele Santoro; Paul Landais; Paola Torreri; Claudio Carta; Deborah Mascalzoni; Sabina Gainotti; Estrella Lopez; Anna Ambrosini; Heimo Müller; Robert Reis; Fabrizio Bianchi; Yaffa R Rubinstein; Hanns Lochmüller; Domenica Taruscio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Charlotte M W Gaasterland; Kit C B Roes; Caridad Pontes; Roser Vives; Arantxa Sancho; Stavros Nikolakopoulos; Eric Vermeulen; Johanna H van der Lee Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Sandra Brasil; Carlota Pascoal; Rita Francisco; Vanessa Dos Reis Ferreira; Paula A Videira; And Gonçalo Valadão Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.096