Agnieszka Popiel1, Bogdan Zawadzki2, Ewa Pragłowska3, Yona Teichman4. 1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: apopiel@swps.edu.pl. 2. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: bogdan@psych.uw.edu.pl. 3. Interdisciplinary Center for Behavior Genetic Research, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: ewa.p.cbt@wp.pl. 4. School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center, Herzeliya, Israel. Electronic address: yonat@post.tau.ac.il.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about direct comparisons of the efficacy of trauma-focused psychotherapies and SSRIs. This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of prolonged exposure (PE), paroxetine (Ph) and their combination (Comb) in a sample of adults diagnosed with PTSD following motor vehicle accidents (MVA). METHODS:A total of 228 people were randomly assigned to a twelve-week treatment of PE (N = 114), Ph (N = 57) or Comb (N = 57). RESULTS: The ITT analyses showed that the remission rate of PTSD was significantly greater after PE (65.5%) compared with Ph (43.3%), whereas Comb (51.2%) did not differ from either. The differences in dropout rates were not significant between treatments (18.4% - PE; 12.2% - Ph; 22.8% - Comb), while the differences in numbers of refusers were significant (3.5% PE <31.6% Comb <47.4% Ph; p < .01). The changes in self-rated PTSD were significant for each treatment and without significant differences between treatments. Differences between clinician and self-rated outcomes can be explained by depressive symptoms influencing self-rating by the PDS. At a 12 month follow-up treatment results were maintained and different trajectories of functioning were identified. LIMITATIONS: Larger samples would allow analyses of predictors of treatment response, dropout and refusal. CONCLUSIONS: In this, largest to date study comparing PE, paroxetine and combination treatment in PTSD PE was more effective than Ph in achieving remission of PTSD. The additive effect of Comb over any monotherapy was not shown.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about direct comparisons of the efficacy of trauma-focused psychotherapies and SSRIs. This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of prolonged exposure (PE), paroxetine (Ph) and their combination (Comb) in a sample of adults diagnosed with PTSD following motor vehicle accidents (MVA). METHODS: A total of 228 people were randomly assigned to a twelve-week treatment of PE (N = 114), Ph (N = 57) or Comb (N = 57). RESULTS: The ITT analyses showed that the remission rate of PTSD was significantly greater after PE (65.5%) compared with Ph (43.3%), whereas Comb (51.2%) did not differ from either. The differences in dropout rates were not significant between treatments (18.4% - PE; 12.2% - Ph; 22.8% - Comb), while the differences in numbers of refusers were significant (3.5% PE <31.6% Comb <47.4% Ph; p < .01). The changes in self-rated PTSD were significant for each treatment and without significant differences between treatments. Differences between clinician and self-rated outcomes can be explained by depressive symptoms influencing self-rating by the PDS. At a 12 month follow-up treatment results were maintained and different trajectories of functioning were identified. LIMITATIONS: Larger samples would allow analyses of predictors of treatment response, dropout and refusal. CONCLUSIONS: In this, largest to date study comparing PE, paroxetine and combination treatment in PTSDPE was more effective than Ph in achieving remission of PTSD. The additive effect of Comb over any monotherapy was not shown.
Authors: Sheila A M Rauch; H Myra Kim; Corey Powell; Peter W Tuerk; Naomi M Simon; Ron Acierno; Carolyn B Allard; Sonya B Norman; Margaret R Venners; Barbara O Rothbaum; Murray B Stein; Katherine Porter; Brian Martis; Anthony P King; Israel Liberzon; K Luan Phan; Charles W Hoge Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Francesca Gimigliano; Vanessa M Young; Chiara Arienti; Silvia Bargeri; Greta Castellini; Silvia Gianola; Stefano G Lazzarini; Antimo Moretti; Allen W Heinemann; Stefano Negrini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Cecília R Proença; John C Markowitz; Bruno M Coimbra; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Mariana R Maciel; Andrea F Mello; Marcelo F Mello Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2022-10-14
Authors: Rachel Levy; Muthoni Mathai; Purba Chatterjee; Linnet Ongeri; Simon Njuguna; Dickens Onyango; Dickens Akena; Grace Rota; Ammon Otieno; Thomas C Neylan; Hafsa Lukwata; James G Kahn; Craig R Cohen; David Bukusi; Gregory A Aarons; Rachel Burger; Kelly Blum; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Charles E McCulloch; Susan M Meffert Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2019-12-28 Impact factor: 3.630