Literature DB >> 25677188

LEAP: biomarker inference through learning and evaluating association patterns.

Xia Jiang1, Richard E Neapolitan.   

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) high-dimensional datasets are available from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Such data provide researchers opportunities to investigate the complex genetic basis of diseases. Much of genetic risk might be due to undiscovered epistatic interactions, which are interactions in which combination of several genes affect disease. Research aimed at discovering interacting SNPs from GWAS datasets proceeded in two directions. First, tools were developed to evaluate candidate interactions. Second, algorithms were developed to search over the space of candidate interactions. Another problem when learning interacting SNPs, which has not received much attention, is evaluating how likely it is that the learned SNPs are associated with the disease. A complete system should provide this information as well. We develop such a system. Our system, called LEAP, includes a new heuristic search algorithm for learning interacting SNPs, and a Bayesian network based algorithm for computing the probability of their association. We evaluated the performance of LEAP using 100 1,000-SNP simulated datasets, each of which contains 15 SNPs involved in interactions. When learning interacting SNPs from these datasets, LEAP outperformed seven others methods. Furthermore, only SNPs involved in interactions were found to be probable. We also used LEAP to analyze real Alzheimer's disease and breast cancer GWAS datasets. We obtained interesting and new results from the Alzheimer's dataset, but limited results from the breast cancer dataset. We conclude that our results support that LEAP is a useful tool for extracting candidate interacting SNPs from high-dimensional datasets and determining their probability.
© 2015 The Authors. *Genetic Epidemiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Bayesian network; GWAS; LOAD; SNP; biomarker; breast cancer; epistasis; high-dimensional; interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25677188      PMCID: PMC4366363          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  49 in total

1.  Bayesian graphical models for genomewide association studies.

Authors:  Claudio J Verzilli; Nigel Stallard; John C Whittaker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Can Yang; Zengyou He; Xiang Wan; Qiang Yang; Hong Xue; Weichuan Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Fine mapping of the chromosome 10q11-q21 linkage region in Alzheimer's disease cases and controls.

Authors:  Margaret Daniele Fallin; Megan Szymanski; Ruihua Wang; Adrian Gherman; Susan S Bassett; Dimitrios Avramopoulos
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.660

5.  Supervised machine learning and logistic regression identifies novel epistatic risk factors with PTPN22 for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F B S Briggs; P P Ramsay; E Madden; J M Norris; V M Holers; T R Mikuls; T Sokka; M F Seldin; P K Gregersen; L A Criswell; L F Barcellos
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.676

6.  Genetic-linkage mapping of complex hereditary disorders to a whole-genome molecular-interaction network.

Authors:  Ivan Iossifov; Tian Zheng; Miron Baron; T Conrad Gilliam; Andrey Rzhetsky
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Comparative analysis of methods for detecting interacting loci.

Authors:  Li Chen; Guoqiang Yu; Carl D Langefeld; David J Miller; Richard T Guy; Jayaram Raghuram; Xiguo Yuan; David M Herrington; Yue Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Detecting epistatic effects in association studies at a genomic level based on an ensemble approach.

Authors:  Jing Li; Benjamin Horstman; Yixuan Chen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A bayesian method for evaluating and discovering disease loci associations.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; M Michael Barmada; Gregory F Cooper; Michael J Becich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Jeff W Kiralis; Angeline S Andrew; Margaret R Karagas; Jason H Moore
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of Common Antipsychotic-Induced Adverse Effects.

Authors:  Raymond R MacNeil; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  Mol Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2016-05-20

2.  Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain.

Authors:  Zexian Zeng; Xia Jiang; Richard Neapolitan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Learning Predictive Interactions Using Information Gain and Bayesian Network Scoring.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Jeremy Jao; Richard Neapolitan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modeling miRNA-mRNA interactions that cause phenotypic abnormality in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sanghoon Lee; Xia Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.