G Lucas1, F Accadbled2, P Violas3, J Sales de Gauzy2, J Knörr2. 1. Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France. 2. Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital d'Enfants Purpan, place du Docteur-Baylac 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France. 3. Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France. Electronic address: philippe.violas@chu-rennes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of isolated meniscal tears in paediatric patients is poorly standardised, and few published data are available. Nevertheless, there is widespread agreement that meniscectomy, even when partial, produces poor outcomes including the premature development of osteoarthritis. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic repair of isolated meniscal tears in paediatric patients yields good outcomes and should be attempted routinely. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 19 arthroscopic repair procedures performed between 2006 and 2010 by a single surgeon in 17 patients with a mean age of 14 years. In every case, the knee was stable and the meniscus normal before the meniscal tear, which was the only injury. Mean follow-up was 22 months. In all 19 cases, the evaluation included a physical examination, pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and determination of the Tegner and Lysholm scores. Post-operative MRI was performed in 10 cases. RESULTS: The outcome was good in 12/17 (70%) patients with significant improvements in the mean Tegner score, from 3.9 to 7.1, and mean Lysholm score, from 55.9 to 85.4, between the pre-operative and post-operative assessments. The clinical outcomes were not significantly associated with time to arthroscopic repair, gender, lesion site, or lesion type. Neither was any correlation demonstrated between clinical outcomes and meniscal healing as assessed by MRI. DISCUSSION: The known poor outcomes after meniscectomy in paediatric patients, the results of our study, and previously published data support routine arthroscopic repair of isolated meniscal tears in this age group, regardless of the site and type of injury. In addition, in asymptomatic patients, clinical follow-up is sufficient and post-operative MRI unnecessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.
BACKGROUND: The management of isolated meniscal tears in paediatric patients is poorly standardised, and few published data are available. Nevertheless, there is widespread agreement that meniscectomy, even when partial, produces poor outcomes including the premature development of osteoarthritis. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic repair of isolated meniscal tears in paediatric patients yields good outcomes and should be attempted routinely. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 19 arthroscopic repair procedures performed between 2006 and 2010 by a single surgeon in 17 patients with a mean age of 14 years. In every case, the knee was stable and the meniscus normal before the meniscal tear, which was the only injury. Mean follow-up was 22 months. In all 19 cases, the evaluation included a physical examination, pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and determination of the Tegner and Lysholm scores. Post-operative MRI was performed in 10 cases. RESULTS: The outcome was good in 12/17 (70%) patients with significant improvements in the mean Tegner score, from 3.9 to 7.1, and mean Lysholm score, from 55.9 to 85.4, between the pre-operative and post-operative assessments. The clinical outcomes were not significantly associated with time to arthroscopic repair, gender, lesion site, or lesion type. Neither was any correlation demonstrated between clinical outcomes and meniscal healing as assessed by MRI. DISCUSSION: The known poor outcomes after meniscectomy in paediatric patients, the results of our study, and previously published data support routine arthroscopic repair of isolated meniscal tears in this age group, regardless of the site and type of injury. In addition, in asymptomatic patients, clinical follow-up is sufficient and post-operative MRI unnecessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.
Authors: Adam J Tagliero; Nicholas I Kennedy; Devin P Leland; Christopher L Camp; Todd A Milbrandt; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Kenneth M Lin; Naomi E Gadinsky; Craig E Klinger; Jonathan P Dyke; Scott A Rodeo; Daniel W Green; Peter D Fabricant; David L Helfet; Kevin G Shea; Lionel E Lazaro Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Daniel J Liechti; David S Constantinescu; Taylor J Ridley; Jorge Chahla; Justin J Mitchell; Alexander R Vap Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-05-13
Authors: Kevin G Shea; Aleksei B Dingel; Alexandra Styhl; Connor G Richmond; Peter C Cannamela; Allen F Anderson; Theodore J Ganley; Andrew Hill; Yi-Meng Yen Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-06-28
Authors: Jordan W Fried; Amit K Manjunath; Eoghan T Hurley; Laith M Jazrawi; Eric J Strauss; Kirk A Campbell Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-12-24