Literature DB >> 25676878

Improving evidence developed from population-level experience with targeted agents.

M B McClellan1, G W Daniel, D Dickson, J Perlmutter, D P Berger, V Miller, S Nussbaum, J Malin, M H Romine, R L Schilsky.   

Abstract

Off-label drug use is common in oncology, due in part to significant unmet medical need, the rarity of many cancers, and the difficulty of conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support labeling of every drug in every disease setting. As new drugs are developed for use in tumors defined by genomic aberrations, it may be scientifically reasonable to expect that a targeted anti-cancer agent with efficacy in a biomarker-defined population within one tumor type may also have activity in another tumor type expressing the same biomarker. Such expectations also fuel off-label prescribing. However, the current approach to prescribing targeted agents off-label does not capture patient outcomes, thus missing an opportunity to gather data that could validate this approach. We explore the potential for collecting such data, highlight two proposals for oncology-specific patient registries, and put forward considerations that should be addressed to move toward better evidence development around off-label use.
© 2015 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics; Month Year; Volume X Number Y

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25676878     DOI: 10.1002/cpt.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  2 in total

Review 1.  Off-label use of targeted therapies in oncology.

Authors:  Dominique Levêque
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics: Biomarker-Directed Therapy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Robert T Jones; Kenneth M Felsenstein; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.