Literature DB >> 25676541

Change in diagnosis and treatment following specialty voice evaluation: A national database analysis.

Seth M Cohen1, Jaewhan Kim2, Nelson Roy3, Amber Wilk4, Steven Thomas4, Mark Courey5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the association between specialty voice evaluation and changes in laryngeal diagnosis and treatment in patients with laryngeal/voice disorders. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a large, national administrative U.S. claims database.
METHODS: Patients included were identified with a laryngeal disorder based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2008, and had been seen by an otolaryngologist as an outpatient and had a specialty voice evaluation designated by videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) within 90 days of the last laryngoscopy. Patient diagnosis at the last laryngoscopy visit and the subsequent initial VLS visit were collected. Specific treatment modalities were tabulated for the 30-day period after the last laryngoscopy and for 30 days after the VLS.
RESULTS: A total of 168,444 unique patients saw an otolaryngologist for 273,616 outpatient visits. Of those, 6.1% had a VLS performed, of which 4,000 (23.8%) occurred within 90 days of the last laryngoscopy, with a median interval of 30 days (interquartile range 15-50 days). Half of the patient visits had a change in laryngeal diagnosis. Changes in use of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, voice therapy, and surgical intervention were seen after specialty voice evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Specialty voice evaluation was associated with changes in laryngeal diagnosis and treatment. Further study is needed to assess the impact on health care costs and patient outcomes.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngeal disorders; diagnosis; dysphonia; stroboscopy; treatment; voice; voice disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25676541      PMCID: PMC4686278          DOI: 10.1002/lary.25192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  19 in total

1.  Efficacy of videostroboscopy in the diagnosis of voice disorders.

Authors:  R R Casiano; V Zaveri; D S Lundy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Variability in nomenclature of benign laryngeal pathology based on video laryngoscopy with and without stroboscopy.

Authors:  H N Chau; K Desai; C Georgalas; M Harries
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Patterns in the evaluation of hoarseness: time to presentation, laryngeal visualization, and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Sarah E Keesecker; Thomas Murry; Lucian Sulica
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Direct health care costs of laryngeal diseases and disorders.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Jaewhan Kim; Nelson Roy; Carl Asche; Mark Courey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  What are the illness perceptions of people with dysphonia: a pilot study.

Authors:  F Buck; M Drinnan; J Wilson; I S Barnard
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Frequency and factors associated with use of videolaryngostroboscopy in voice disorder assessment.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Steven Thomas; Nelson Roy; Jaewhan Kim; Mark Courey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Hoarseness: is it really laryngopharyngeal reflux?

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; C Gaelyn Garrett
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Stroboscopy for benign laryngeal pathology in evidence based health care.

Authors:  A Printza; S Triaridis; C Themelis; J Constantinidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Diagnosis and treatment of persistent dysphonia after laryngeal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 62 patients.

Authors:  P Woo; J Casper; R Colton; D Brewer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Hoarseness misattributed to reflux: sources and patterns of error.

Authors:  Lucian Sulica
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pharmacologic management of voice disorders by general medicine providers and otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Hui-Jie Lee; Nelson Roy; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Mental Health and Dysphonia: Which Comes First, and Does That Change Care Utilization?

Authors:  Victoria A Jordan; Seth Cohen; Scott Lunos; Keith J Horvath; Gretchen Sieger; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Impact of subspecialty consultations on diagnosis in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sonali Ramesh; Brennan Ayres; Patrick Ten Eyck; Jeffrey D Dawson; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Hardeep Singh; Loreen A Herwaldt; Christina L Cifra
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Multi-institutional Study of Voice Disorders and Voice Therapy Referral: Report from the CHEER Network.

Authors:  Stephanie Misono; Schelomo Marmor; Nelson Roy; Ted Mau; Seth M Cohen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Association of voice and mental health diagnoses with differences in voice-related care utilization.

Authors:  Victoria A Jordan; Scott Lunos; Gretchen Sieger; Keith J Horvath; Seth Cohen; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Time to Laryngoscopy for Hoarseness in Canada: Are the American Academy of Otolaryngology Guidelines Feasible?

Authors:  Joel Howlett; Joel Singer; Terry Lee; Amanda Hu
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2020-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.