The first kinase inhibitor drug approval in 2001 initiated a remarkable decade of tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs for oncology indications, but a void exists for serine/threonine protein kinase inhibitor drugs and central nervous system indications. Stress kinases are of special interest in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders due to their involvement in synaptic dysfunction and complex disease susceptibility. Clinical and preclinical evidence implicates the stress related kinase p38αMAPK as a potential neurotherapeutic target, but isoform selective p38αMAPK inhibitor candidates are lacking and the mixed kinase inhibitor drugs that are promising in peripheral tissue disease indications have limitations for neurologic indications. Therefore, pursuit of the neurotherapeutic hypothesis requires kinase isoform selective inhibitors with appropriate neuropharmacology features. Synaptic dysfunction disorders offer a potential for enhanced pharmacological efficacy due to stress-induced activation of p38αMAPK in both neurons and glia, the interacting cellular components of the synaptic pathophysiological axis, to be modulated. We report a novel isoform selective p38αMAPK inhibitor, MW01-18-150SRM (=MW150), that is efficacious in suppression of hippocampal-dependent associative and spatial memory deficits in two distinct synaptic dysfunction mouse models. A synthetic scheme for biocompatible product and positive outcomes from pharmacological screens are presented. The high-resolution crystallographic structure of the p38αMAPK/MW150 complex documents active site binding, reveals a potential low energy conformation of the bound inhibitor, and suggests a structural explanation for MW150's exquisite target selectivity. As far as we are aware, MW150 is without precedent as an isoform selective p38MAPK inhibitor or as a kinase inhibitor capable of modulating in vivo stress related behavior.
The first kinase inhibitor drug approval in 2001 initiated a remarkable decade of tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs for oncology indications, but a void exists for serine/threonine protein kinase inhibitor drugs and central nervous system indications. Stresskinases are of special interest in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders due to their involvement in synaptic dysfunction and complex disease susceptibility. Clinical and preclinical evidence implicates the stress related kinase p38αMAPK as a potential neurotherapeutic target, but isoform selective p38αMAPK inhibitor candidates are lacking and the mixed kinase inhibitor drugs that are promising in peripheral tissue disease indications have limitations for neurologic indications. Therefore, pursuit of the neurotherapeutic hypothesis requires kinase isoform selective inhibitors with appropriate neuropharmacology features. Synaptic dysfunction disorders offer a potential for enhanced pharmacological efficacy due to stress-induced activation of p38αMAPK in both neurons and glia, the interacting cellular components of the synaptic pathophysiological axis, to be modulated. We report a novel isoform selective p38αMAPK inhibitor, MW01-18-150SRM (=MW150), that is efficacious in suppression of hippocampal-dependent associative and spatial memory deficits in two distinct synaptic dysfunction mouse models. A synthetic scheme for biocompatible product and positive outcomes from pharmacological screens are presented. The high-resolution crystallographic structure of the p38αMAPK/MW150 complex documents active site binding, reveals a potential low energy conformation of the bound inhibitor, and suggests a structural explanation for MW150's exquisite target selectivity. As far as we are aware, MW150 is without precedent as an isoform selective p38MAPK inhibitor or as a kinase inhibitor capable of modulating in vivo stress related behavior.
Entities:
Keywords:
Signal transduction; chemical synthesis; cognitive dysfunction; crystallography; pharmacology; protein kinase
The approval
of Gleevac in 2001
provided the first kinase inhibitor drug.[1] Gleevec is a multikinase inhibitor that binds at the active site
of tyrosine kinases.[2,3] Subsequent approved kinase inhibitor
drugs shared the features of active site binding and multikinase targeting.[2−4] These early historical development trends contributed to prevailing
bias and perspectives.[2−4] For example, one concern was that in vivo function
might require drug candidates to have multikinase activity.[2] Another concern was that development of kinase
inhibitor drugs would be limited if one targeted the active site,
due to the level of sequence similarity of catalytic domains across
the kinome family and the high levels of ATP in the eukaryoticcell.[2,4,5] However, the kinase active site
continues to be highly druggable as documented by the approved kinase
inhibitor drugs that target the active site.[3] In addition, progress in recent years indicates the feasibility
of generating new kinase inhibitor drug candidates with even greater
selectivity through medicinal chemistry optimization driven by structural
biology approaches.[2,6] Regardless, the above concerns
and the estimate that only about 2% of small molecule drugs have adequate
blood brain barrier distribution[7] have
led to the perspective that kinases are not a promising class of central
nervous system (CNS) drug development targets.Clearly, major
gaps remain in the protein kinase inhibitor drug
pipeline,[3−6] including: (1) the limited number of validated protein kinase targets
outside oncology indications; (2) the paucity of serine/threonine
(S/T) protein kinase inhibitor drugs; and (3) the absence of approved
CNS kinase inhibitor drugs. Successful targeting of CNS S/T kinases
represents an intertwined triple challenge. First, there is the inherent
tissue barrier challenge of CNS drug development.[7] Second, there is an insufficient number of single kinase-specific
in vivo small molecule tools for target validation studies.[3,5,6] Initial target validation requires
evidence for modulation by selective probes. While genetic knock down
and chemical proteomics studies are key for discovery, inherent limitations
of the latter approaches, including the potential of an observed phenotype
being indirect due to an effect on the kinase interactome, do not
allow them to stand alone for initial target validation.[5,10,11] The ideal is to complement the
broader discovery approaches with direct in vivo molecular probe approach,
but this can be technically challenging. Third, intracellular S/T
kinases are nodes in an integrated system[11] in which the in vivo function of a widely distributed enzyme is
dependent on the context of tissue physiological state as well as
molecular partners and cellular localization. Because alteration of
phenotype does not require full activation of all kinase nodes in
the network, it is not currently possible to forecast what percentage
inhibition of the fractionally activated network will result in restoration
of homeostasis. It is critical, therefore, that individual CNS S/T
protein kinases be examined for their potential pharmacological modulation
with selective in vivo probes and that CNS drug candidates with these
attributes be developed.[3,6,8,10]A potential neurotherapeutickinase target identified across diverse
disease areas is p38αMAPK, a S/T protein kinase implicated in
various stress-induced activations within neurons and glia, the cellular
components of the synaptic physiologic axis that manifests dysfunction
across multiple dementia and neurodegenerative disorders.[6,8,10,12−23] However, deconvolution of p38αMAPK’s exact signaling
function for a given in vivo physiological or pathophysiological role
is complicated by a number of factors,[6−10] including: (1) wide tissue distribution; (2) presence as a mixture
of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated states that differ in activity;
(3) protein–protein interactions that control subcellular localizations;
and (4) the presence of parallel interactive signaling pathways responding
to the same cellular stressors as part of an integrated system-wide
network. Regardless of the mechanistic knowledge gaps, recent evidence
from in vivo studies with selective p38αMAPK inhibitor molecular
probes[6] demonstrated attenuation of neuroinflammation,
synaptic dysfunction, and cognitive deficits, thereby providing a
more direct pharmacological link among mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics,
and efficacy. However, issues of metabolic stability, CYP substrate
status, and oral bioavailability limit the potential use of these
in vivo probes for drug development in complex diseases that require
extended exposure, repeat administration, and low potential for drug–drug
interactions via CYP substrate or inhibitor status.The accumulating
body of evidence for CNS p38αMAPK as a target
offers the potential of an unusual pharmacological strategy where
the same inhibitor might be used to attenuate stressor induced pathophysiological
responses in two interacting cells, glia and neurons, within the synaptic
structure. Targeting such a localized neuropathophysiology axis could
offer an enhanced potential for efficacy.[3,6] For
example, an enhanced potential for efficacy could arise if both the
endogenous glia and neuron pathways are key to pathophysiology progression
during a common intervention time window. In addition, a potential
for an extended efficacy time window might occur if the importance
of activated glia is key early in progression and neuronal stress
is more critical at later time windows of progression, allowing for
the same drug to have extended pharmacodynamics via action in overlapping
but distinct pathology progression time windows. Dosing, the pharmacological
basis of therapeutics, would allow the probing of such possibilities
once a candidate therapeutic is obtained. However, the future testing
of various neurotherapeutic hypotheses involving p38αMAPK requires
a priori the availability of a highly selective p38αMAPK inhibitor
candidate with appropriate pharmacological properties.As a
further step toward addressing the hypothesis of p38αMAPK
as a potential neurotherapeutic target, we report here the synthesis
and functional characterization of MW01-18-150SRM (referred to as
MW150), a novel selective inhibitor of the p38αMAPK isoform
with promising pharmacological features and in vivo CNS efficacy.
Memory loss is the clinical hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease
(AD), and drugs approved for AD employ the attenuation of memory loss
as a qualifying end point. Therefore, we used a detailed behavioral
assessment of memory as the initial relevant pharmacodynamic readout
for MW150 efficacy. Two independent mouse models of AD relevant pathophysiology
progression were employed. One is a transgenic model with rapid pathophysiology
progression. The other is a humanized knock-in model that employs
endogenous promoters and exhibits age-related pathophysiology progression
over an extended time frame. The in vivo efficacy of MW150 is consistent
with a true hippocampus-dependent mechanism of action in attenuation
of memory deficits. Key pharmacological screens of MW150 indicate
the potential for compatible use with approved AD drugs. In aggregate,
the results are consistent with future pursuit of MW150 as a logical
drug candidate. Molecular level characterization of MW150 by high
resolution crystallography of the humanp38αMAPK/MW150 complex
documents MW150’s active site occupancy with key intermolecular
interactions, indicates that the active site bound inhibitor is in
a relative low energy conformation, and provides a rational explanation
for the molecular basis of MW150 exquisite selectivity. Overall, the
results are consistent with MW150 being a unique candidate for the
in vivo study of CNS function and dysfunction, provide a precedent
for kinase active site targeting to attain highly selective kinase
inhibitors with in vivo CNS function, and support the concept of attenuating
behavioral deficitsthrough the use of protein kinase inhibitors.
Results
and Discussion
Rationale and Overview
The scaffold
repurposing approach[6,12] that delivered MW150 employed
high-resolution crystallography of
complexes containing humanp38αMAPK combined with small molecule
design using pharmacoinformatics considerations. Synthesized inhibitors
were curated by activity and pharmacological screening.[6,12] The initial hit, MW069a,[12] was obtained
by alternative placement of the pyridine substituent on the pyridazinecore of a safe, brain penetrant experimental therapeutic, MW189[24] (Figure 1). MW189 attenuates
neurotoxic overproduction of cytokines by activated glia back toward
normal, has no reported direct therapeutic effects on neurons, and
is negative in kinome-wide screens. The alternative placement of the
pyridine ring to produce MW069a generated a key H-bonding interaction
with the p38αMAPK hinge region backbone and allowed occupancy
by the phenyl substituent of the nearby hydrophobic pocket (see PDB
entry 4EWQ).
MW069a lacks inhibitor activity with p38αMAPK(T106M), the enzymatically
active point mutant in which the introduction of a bulky amino acid
at the entrance to the hydrophobic pocket prohibits access by ligand
aromatic substituents, provided a link between crystal structure of
the complex and in vitro inhibition activity.[12] Although MW069a has in vivo function in an Alzheimer’s disease
relevant screening assay,[12] it is a mixed
kinase inhibitor like extant p38αMAPK inhibitor drugs and has
a limited safety with dose escalation. Therefore, pharmacological
safety was improved next[6] by reduction
in the size of the exocyclicamine substituent. The p38αMAPK
specificity and affinity was also improved[6] through the introduction of a 2-naphthyl substituent at the R6 position (Figure 1). The simplest
of the resultant naphthylpyridazinylpyridines (MW181, PDB 4F9Y; MW108, PDB 4F9W) retain the key
target interactions, engage in a dose dependent manner the endogenous
p38αMAPK in activated glia, and are selective as demonstrated
by kinome-wide activity screens and inactivity with the p38αMAPK(T106M)
drug resistant knock-in mouse glia.[6] However,
further exploration of in vivo function and the potential for preclinical
drug development was limited by their potential for metabolism and
distribution as evidenced by human liver microsome (HLM) screening
assay outcomes of T1/2 = 18 min (MW181)
and T1/2 = 33 min (MW108).
Figure 1
Repurposing of a nonkinase
CNS experimental therapeutic to CNS
kinase inhibitor.
Repurposing of a nonkinase
CNS experimental therapeutic to CNS
kinase inhibitor.As summarized herein,
a final optimization by synthesis and screening
yielded MW150 that has improved HLM stability (T1/2 > 60 min) and oral bioavailability (>50%) as well
as an
incrementally improved p38αMAPK inhibition activity with retention
of target selectivity, safety, and brain penetrance. A summary of
key MW150 features described in the following sections is provided
in Table 1. Attempts at further improvement
in metabolic stability potential were addressed through synthesis
and testing of R3 amine analogues and R6 fluoronaphthyl
analogues of MW150 (Supporting Information Table S1) that did not yield significant improvement in multiproperty
features. For example, fluoronaphthyl analogues did not improve HLM
stability and, in some cases, resulted in loss of activity. MW150,
containing a R3 piperazine substituent and R6 2-naphthyl substituent, represents the best in class for metabolic
and bioavailability potential with retention of isoform selective
p38αMAPK IC50 activity. Overall, the results demonstrate
that the active site of this protein kinase can be targeted to generate
an isoform selective inhibitor with in vivo CNS efficacy. The molecular
and pharmacological profile describes a unique deliverable appropriate
for future investigational new drug (IND) enabling preclinical development.
Table 1
Summary Data Sheet for MW150
MW (base)
381.47
MW (hydrochloride hydrate)
490.43
cLogP
2.18
PSA
45.15
chemical stability
stable at pH (1–13), 24 h, 37 °C
solubility (hydrochloride
hydrate)
>l mg/mL
pKa (potentiometrie; spectrophotometric)
3.83, 7.27; 3.62, 7.27
apparent target affinity
Ki = 101 nM (p38αMAPK)
target cocrystal structure
PDB 4R3C; 2 Å
kinome target
class selectivity
negative except p38αMAPK
functional GPCR off-target
activity
negative
Caco-2 permeability/P-gp
substrate
highly
permeable; not P-gp
substrate
MDCK permeability/BCRP substrate
highly permeable; not BCRP
substrate
human liver microsome stability
T1/2 > 60 min
human CYP substrate
negative: 1A2, 2B6, 2D6,
2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4
human CYP inhibition
negative: 1A2, 2B6, 2D6,
2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4
MAO-A/MAO-B inhibition
negative
AMES test
negative
oral Bioavailability
>50%
Brain/plasma ratio
>0.9
Chemistry
MW150, 6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-3-(naphthalen-2-yl)-4-(pyridin-4-yl)
pyridazine (8 = MW150), and its hydrochloride salt (9) were made via an eight step, multigram scale, synthetic
scheme (Scheme 1) with a final product (purity,
96%) appropriate for biological investigations. The details and the
characterization of intermediate and final products in Scheme 1 are provided in Methods. Briefly, 2-naphthoyl chloride was reacted with N,O-dimethylhydroxyl amine to provide the Weinreb
amide 2 in quantitative yield. Treatment of 2 with the lithio salt of 4-picoline gave the expected ketone 3, which was further reacted with sodium hydride and ethyl
bromoacetate to form the ketoester intermediate 4. Reaction
of 4 with hydrazine gave the expected dihydropyridazinone 5, which was oxidized to 6 with aqueous NBS in
DMSO. Conversion to the bromide 7 occurred following
treatment with phosphorus oxybromide in acetonitrile. The free base
of the final product 8 was obtained when bromide 7 was treated with 1-methylpiperazine. The crystalline substance
was treated with HCl to give the final salt form 9. The
final hydrochloride salt form (9) was confirmed by elemental
analysis and has acceptable water solubility (>1 mg/mL) for use
in
the biological studies reported here. The attractiveness of the synthetic
scheme for future development purposes is its flexible nature and
the potential for use of various GMPcompatible reagents, solvents,
and conditions.[28] The flexible nature of
the scheme combined with the atomic resolution crystal structure of
the human protein target and the small molecule candidate (Figure 2; PDB 4R3C) also provides a platform for facile incorporation
of any future optimizations that might be desired.
Scheme 1
Figure 2
Stereo view of omit map for MW150 bound
in the active site of human
p38αMAPK. The map represents the difference electron density
(mesh) contoured at 2.5σ. The analysis indicates the goodness
of fit between the model and experimental data and is consistent with
an energetically favorable conformation for MW150 (purple). Key amino
acids in p38α MAPK (green) indicated: Met 109, involved in H-bonding
with MW150, and Thr 106, gate-keeper for access to the hydrophobic
pocket.
Structure
The crystal structure of the complex containing
humanp38αMAPK and MW150 (PDB 4R3C) is of high quality (Table 2 and Figure 2). As discussed recently,[29] the issue of ligand geometry accuracy and the
evaluation of parameters involved in protein ligand contacts are critical
to interpretation of crystallography results in terms of target recognition
and the implications for mechanism. Further, widely used virtual screening
approaches in drug discovery are critically dependent on the robustness
of experimental database entries based on crystallography. The paucity
of isoform selective kinase inhibitors or CNS penetrant kinase inhibitors
with in vivo function make the robustness of data evaluation even
more critical. Table 2 statistics demonstrate
a good fit of the diffraction data and the structural model for p38αMAPK.
Further, there is a good fit of the inhibitor MW150 diffraction data
(Figure 2). The results are consistent with
an energetically favorable conformation of the piperazine ring in
the target bound form of the inhibitor. Overall, the quality of the
diffraction data and its fitting to the structural model provides
increased confidence in evaluations of key interactions between humanp38αMAPK and MW150.
Table 2
Crystallographic
Data and Refinement
Statistics for the Human p38αMAPK-MW150 Complex (PDB accession
code 4R3C)
data collection
space group
P212121
wavelength (Å)
0.97872
cell dimensions
65.85, 74.51, 77.80, 90,
90, 90
resolution (Å)
30.00–2.05
outer resolution
2.09–2.05
completeness (%)
99.8 (100.0)
Rmerge
0.062 (0.599)
mean (I/σ)
23.17 (2.37)
redundancy
4.8 (4.9)
no. of unique
reflections
24 314
refinement
resolution (Å)
29.93–2.06
Rwork
17.5
Rfree
21.6
RMSD bond lengths (Å)
0.009
RMSD bond angles (deg)
1.39
Stereo view of omit map for MW150 bound
in the active site of humanp38αMAPK. The map represents the difference electron density
(mesh) contoured at 2.5σ. The analysis indicates the goodness
of fit between the model and experimental data and is consistent with
an energetically favorable conformation for MW150 (purple). Key amino
acids in p38α MAPK (green) indicated: Met 109, involved in H-bonding
with MW150, and Thr 106, gate-keeper for access to the hydrophobic
pocket.Inspection of the crystallographic
structure reveals that MW150
and humanp38αMAPK retain the key complementary interactions
that drove the discovery approach. Key conserved interactions within
the active site (Figure 3A) include the hydrogen
bond interaction between the pyridine ring nitrogen of MW150 and the
amide backbone at Leu108-Met109 (Figure 3B)
and occupancy of the proximal hydrophobic pocket by the naphthyl substituent
of MW150 (Figure 3C). MW150 appears to use
a single hydrogen bond interaction with the hinge region and does
not induce significant localized conformational changes in the humanp38αMAPK active site. Notably, prior work showed that the crystallographic
experimental approach is validated for the detection of such localized
conformational changes in the hinge region should they be present.[6] The significant space filling of the hydrophobic
pocket by the naphthyl substituent is illustrated in the surface representation
generated by residues within a 5 Å distance (Figure 3C). The greater space filling function of the naphthyl
group, in the context of the other interactions such as the canonical
hydrogen bonding with the hinge region, contributes to target affinity
and selectivity. The structural results, combined with the large scale
target screening data presented in the following section, suggest
that the intimate pocket occupancy is a key contributor to specificity
via the exclusion of MW150 binding to other targets in the proteome
that either lack, or have less accommodating, proximal pockets. Overall,
the most parsimonious model for this precedent of kinase isoform selectivity
via targeting of the active site is one that maximizes of key chemical
complementarities between MW150 and p38αMAPK.
Figure 3
Human
p38αMAPK active site occupancy by MW150 (PDB 4R3C). (A) Connolly surface
representation of the active site of p38αMAPK containing MW150.
(B) Close-up view of the p38αMAPK hinge region near Met109 (left)
and the pyridine substituent of MW150 (right) that are involved in
hydrogen bond interaction. The gray mesh represents the experimental
2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 1.2σ. (C) Surface created
by amino acids within 5 Å of the naphthyl group of MW150. This
perspective highlights the volume that the naphthyl substituent of
MW150 occupies within the p38αMAPK hydrophobic pocket that is
proximal in space to the hydrogen-bonding region shown in panel (B).
The blue mesh surrounding MW150 was built from the experimental 2Fo-Fc
electron density contoured at 1.5σ.
Humanp38αMAPK active site occupancy by MW150 (PDB 4R3C). (A) Connolly surface
representation of the active site of p38αMAPK containing MW150.
(B) Close-up view of the p38αMAPK hinge region near Met109 (left)
and the pyridine substituent of MW150 (right) that are involved in
hydrogen bond interaction. The gray mesh represents the experimental
2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 1.2σ. (C) Surface created
by amino acids within 5 Å of the naphthyl group of MW150. This
perspective highlights the volume that the naphthyl substituent of
MW150 occupies within the p38αMAPK hydrophobic pocket that is
proximal in space to the hydrogen-bonding region shown in panel (B).
The blue mesh surrounding MW150 was built from the experimental 2Fo-Fc
electron density contoured at 1.5σ.
Kinome Target Selectivity
A large-scale hierarchical
kinase screen approach[6] was used to demonstrate
(Table 3) the selectivity of MW150 for p38αMAPK
within the protein and lipidkinome. Briefly, 301 protein and lipidkinases representative of all major humankinome branches as well
as isoforms of individual families were screened using substrates
optimized for each kinase. The database accession numbers of the protein
and lipidkinases shown in Table 3 are provided
in Supporting Information Table S2. The
only validated positive hit from the large scale kinome screen with
an IC50 < 1000 nM was p38αMAPK (Table 3). The estimated Ki from
kinetic analyses (Supporting Information Figure S1) is 101 nM. Especially noteworthy (Table 3) is the failure of MW150 to inhibit significantly the other
p38MAPK isoforms. The IC50 for p38αMAPK inhibition
is approximately 10-fold better than that for p38βMAPK, 14-fold
better than that for p38δMAPK, and 6-fold better than that for
the atypical NLK. Further, MW150 does not inhibit the enzymatically
normal p38αMAPK(T106M) point mutant in which the gatekeeper
amino acid threonine is mutated to a bulkier methionine residue, thereby
blocking access by the naphthyl substituent to the hydrophobic pocket.
The kinome screening results are, therefore, consistent with the high
resolution crystal structure of the complex.
Table 3
Large Scale
Hierarchical Kinome Screen
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
kinasea
Hb
Abl
–
CDK5/p25
–
EGFR(790M)
–
GSK3β
–
MARK1
+
PAK5
–
PKCn
–
Sac(I-530)
–
Abl(396P)
–
CDK5/p35
–
EGFR(790M_858R)
–
Hasplin
–
MELK
–
PAK6
–
PKCμ
–
Sac(341M)
–
Abl(351T)
–
CDK6/eyD3
–
EphA1
–
Hck
–
Mer
–
PAR-1Bα
–
PKCθ
–
SRPK1
–
Abl(252H)
–
CDK7/eyH
–
EphA2
–
Hck act
–
Mer
–
PASK
–
PKCξ
–
SRPK2
–
Abl(315I)
–
CDK9/eyT1
–
EphA3
–
H1PK1
–
Mer(1246H)
–
PEK
–
PKIV2
–
STK25
–
Abl(253F)
–
CHK1
–
EphA4
–
H1PK2
–
Mer(1246N)
–
PDOFRα
–
PKG1α
–
STK33
–
ACK1
–
CHK2
–
EphA5
–
H1PK3
–
Mer(1268T)
–
PDOFRα(842 V)
–
PKG1β
–
Syk
–
ALK
–
CHK2(15TT)
–
EphA7
–
IGFIR
–
Mer(1248C)
–
PDOFRα(561D)
–
Plk1
–
TAK1
–
ALK2
–
CHK2(145W)
–
EphA8
–
IGFIR act
–
Mer(1248D)
–
PDOFRβ
–
Plk3
–
TAO1
–
ALK4
–
CK1γ1
–
EphB2
–
IKKα
–
Mer(1248H)
–
PDK1
–
PRAK
–
TAO2
–
Arg
–
CK1γ2
–
EphB1
–
IKKβ
–
MINK
–
PhKγ2
–
PRK2
–
TAO3
–
AMPKα1
–
CK1γ3
–
EphB3
–
IKKe
–
MIKK7β
–
PBK(β)
–
PrKX
–
TBK1
–
AMPKα2
–
CK1δ
–
EphB4
–
IR
–
MLCK
–
PBK(γ)
–
PTK5
–
Tec act
–
ARK5
–
CK2
–
ErbB4
–
IR act
–
MLK1
–
PBK(δ)
–
Pyk2
–
TGFBR1
–
ASK1
–
CK2α2
–
FAK
–
IRE1
–
Mnk2
–
PBK(1047R)
–
p38α
+
Tie2
–
Aurom-A
–
CLK1
–
For
–
IRR
–
MRCKα
–
PBKα
–
p38α106M
–
Tie2(849W)
–
Aurom-B
–
CLK2
–
Fes
–
IRAK1
–
MRCKβ
–
PBKα(542K)
–
p38β
–
Tie2(Y8978)
–
Aurom-C
–
CLK3
–
FGFR1
–
IRAK4
–
MSK1
–
PBKα(545K)
–
p38γ
–
TLK1
–
Ax1
–
CLK4
–
FGFR1(561M)
–
kk
–
MSK2
–
PBKα′p65α
–
p38δ
–
TLK2
–
Bak
–
cKit
–
FGFR2
–
JAK1
–
MSSK1
–
PBKC2α
–
Ret
–
TrkA
–
Bmax
–
cKit(816 V)
–
FGFR2(549H)
–
JAK2
–
MST1
–
PBKC2γ
–
Ret(804L)
–
TrkB
–
BRK
–
cKit(816H)
–
FGFR3
–
JAK3
–
MST2
–
PIP4K2α
–
Ret(804M)
–
TrkC
–
BaSK1
–
cKit(5603)
–
FGFR4
–
JNK1α1
–
MST3
–
PIP5K1α
–
RIPK2
–
TSSK1
–
BaSK2
–
cKit(654A)
–
Fgr
–
JNK2α2
–
MST4
–
PIP5K1γ
–
ROCK-I
–
TSSK2
–
BTK
–
CSK
–
Fit1
–
JNK3
–
mTOR
–
Pim-1
–
ROCK-II
–
Txk
–
BTK(28H)
–
c-RAF
–
Fx3 835Y
–
KDR
–
mTOR/FKBPI2
–
Pim-2
–
Rom
–
TYK2
–
B-Rad
–
cSRC
–
Fx3
–
Lck
–
MnSK
–
Pim-3
–
Ros
–
ULK2
–
B-Rad(599E)
–
DAPK1
–
Fx4
–
Lck act
–
NEK2
–
PKA
–
Rse
–
ULK3
–
CaMKI
–
DAPK2
–
Fins
–
LIMK1
–
NEK3
–
PKBα
–
Rsk1
–
Wee 1
–
CaMKIIβ
–
DCAMK1,2
–
Fins969C
–
LKB1
–
NEK6
–
PKBβ
–
Rsk2
–
WNK2
–
CaMKIIγ
–
DDR2
–
Fyn
–
LOK
–
NEK7
–
PKBγ
–
Rsk3
–
WNK3
–
CaMKIδ
–
DMPK
–
GCK
–
Lyn
–
NEK9
–
PKCα
–
Rsk4
–
VRK2
–
CaMKIIδ
–
DRAK1
–
GCN2
–
LRRK2
–
NEK11
–
PKCβI
–
SGK
–
Yes
–
CaMKIV
–
DYRK2
–
GRK1
–
MAPK1
–
NLK
–
PKCβII
–
SGK2
–
ZAP-70
–
CDK1/eyB
–
cEF-2K
–
GRK5
–
MAPK2
–
p7086K
–
PKCγ
–
SGK3
–
ZIPK
–
CDK2/eyA
–
EGFR
–
GRK6
–
MAPKAPK2
–
PAK1
–
PKCδ
–
SIK
–
CDK2/eyE
–
EGFR(858R)
–
GRK7
–
MAPKAPK3
–
PAK2
–
PKCe
–
Snk
–
CDK3/eyE
–
EGFR(861Q)
–
GSK3α
–
MEK1
–
PAK4
–
PKCη
–
SNRK
–
Accession number for each kinase
is listed in Supporting Information Table
S1.
Hierarchical Kinome
inhibitor screen
done as described in Methods. p38αMAPK
was the only positive (+) hit (H).
Accession number for each kinase
is listed in Supporting Information Table
S1.Hierarchical Kinome
inhibitor screen
done as described in Methods. p38αMAPK
was the only positive (+) hit (H).The secondary assays for quantitative cellular activity
of MW150
were done using a relevant CNS cell population, activated glia. As
shown in Figure 4A, treatment of activated
glia with MW150 inhibits in a concentration-dependent manner the ability
of the endogenous p38αMAPK to phosphorylate an endogenous substrate,
MK2. These results demonstrate that MW150 is able to engage its endogenous
kinase target in a relevant physiological state. MK2 is the proximal
next step in the intracellular p38αMAPK signal transduction
cascade shown to mediate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced increases
in production of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β
(IL-1β). In this context, IL-1β represents a surrogate
pharmacodynamic end point for the p38αMAPK signal transduction
cascade. As shown in Figure 4B, MW150 treatment
blocked in a concentration-dependent manner the increased IL-1β
production by activated glia. The IC50 values for these
MW150 cellular activities are 332 nM (MK2) and 936 nM (IL-1β),
values which are consistent with the in vitro Ki of 101 nM for p38αMAPK.
Figure 4
Concentration-dependent
cellular activity of MW150. (A) MW150 treatment
suppresses the phosphorylation of MK2, a p38αMAPK substrate
whose phosphorylation (activation) is increased in response to LPS
activation of glia. Serial dilutions were added to BV2 microglial
cells stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS, and the levels of pMK2 at 1 h
determined by ELISA analysis. (B) MW150 treatment attenuates the downstream
increase in proinflammatory cytokine production, a mechanism of action
pharmacodynamic end point. Levels of IL-1β at 16 h were determined
by ELISA. Data are expressed as percent of maximal activity (=activity
after LPS stimulation + control vehicle treatment) and are representative
of at least two independent experiments. Open circle = no LPS + veh;
black circle = LPS + veh; gray circle = LPS + MW150.
Concentration-dependent
cellular activity of MW150. (A) MW150 treatment
suppresses the phosphorylation of MK2, a p38αMAPK substrate
whose phosphorylation (activation) is increased in response to LPS
activation of glia. Serial dilutions were added to BV2 microglial
cells stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS, and the levels of pMK2 at 1 h
determined by ELISA analysis. (B) MW150 treatment attenuates the downstream
increase in proinflammatory cytokine production, a mechanism of action
pharmacodynamic end point. Levels of IL-1β at 16 h were determined
by ELISA. Data are expressed as percent of maximal activity (=activity
after LPS stimulation + control vehicle treatment) and are representative
of at least two independent experiments. Open circle = no LPS + veh;
black circle = LPS + veh; gray circle = LPS + MW150.As a further derisking of potential off target
activities, MW150
was also subjected to a large-scale screen for GPCRs, the largest
single target class for approved CNS drugs, in order to address the
potential of unanticipated out-of-target-class activity. MW150 showed
no agonist or antagonist activity against any of the 166 GPCRs tested
in the functional cellular assay (Supporting Information Table S3). The results indicate the extremely low potential for
off-target crossover to this major CNS drug target class.
Pharmacological Screens
The United States Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) recommends[30] testing
new molecular entities as potential substrates or inhibitors for a
critical set of CYP isoforms that are involved in drug and food metabolism,
thereby anticipating dosing, drug–drug interactions, and potential
adverse events in future drug development. This is especially true
for certain CYP isoforms such as CYP2D6 that are known to encode functional
polymorphisms and contribute to pharmacogenetic variance in drug efficacy
or toxicology. Paradoxically, when small molecule lead compounds are
optimized during multiproperty medicinal chemistry refinement to improve
CNS penetrance, an unintended outcome can be increased potential for
CYP substrate status.[25,26] CYP2D6 also can be disproportionately
involved in the metabolism of CNS drugs.[26] Therefore, CYP2D6 substrate status is a No Go decision point in
CNS drug development and is one of the FDA recommended CYPs for screening.
While the substrate or inhibitor status for the other recommended
CYPs may not be as critical, the outcomes can inform the design of
future dosing and adverse pharmacology experiments.As anticipated
based on pharmacoinformatics,[25,26] MW150 was not found
to be a substrate of CYP2D6. Remarkably, MW150 is also not a substrate
for any of the other key CYPs recommended for testing in FDA guidance.
When screened using the standard assays described in Methods, MW150 exhibited a T1/2 > 60 min for all of the recommended CYPs. Positive controls for
each of the CYPs and their respective T1/2 values were as follows: CYP1A2, ethoxyresorufin (T1/2 = 2); CYP2B6, benzphetamine (T1/2 = 17); CYP2D6, dextromethorphan (T1/2 = 4); CYP3A4, midazolam (T1/2 = 4); CYP2C8, paclitaxel, (T1/2 = 39);
CYP2C9, diclofenac (T1/2 = 16); and CYP2C19,
omeprazole (T1/2 = 21). MW150 was also
found not to be a CYP inhibitor when the recommended set of CYP isoforms
were examined (Figure 5). The CYP isoform positive
control inhibitors were as follows: CYP1A2, α-naphthoflavone;
CYP2B6, thio-TEPA; CYP2D6, quinidine; CYP2C8, montelukast; CYP2C9,
sulfaphenazole; CYPC19, (+)-N-3-benzylnivanol; CYP3A4,
ketoconazole. These remarkable results from both CYP substrate and
CYP inhibitor analyses are positive indicators of lowered risk for
use of MW150 in future in vivo drug combination studies which are
expected for complex disease investigations.
Figure 5
CYP inhibition summary.
CYP inhibition summary.The aggregate effect of CYP-based
status was next evaluated in
standardized liver microsome assays. Testosterone was used as a validation
control for both rat and human microsomal preparations, and percent
remaining of test compounds was determined by LC-MS based on the peak
area ratio to the internal standard propranolol. MW150 has a human
liver microsome stability T1/2 > 60
min
and a rodent liver microsomal T1/2 = 43
± 4 min. The intrinsicclearance (CLint) was estimated
as 0.02 ± 0.00 mL/min/mg protein. We concluded that the liver
microsome stability was acceptable for additional pharmacological
studies.A quantitative cellular pharmacology parameter that
is critical
for CNS targeting is the standard assay used to filter drug candidates
for acceptable cell permeability and efflux pump substrate status.
Most small molecule drugs predominately move via passive diffusion
through cellular membranes that comprise tissue barriers. However,
if the drug is an efflux pump substrate, it is removed and eventually
excreted from the body. Poor permeability due to molecular properties
and efflux pump substrate status can individually or in combination
with other factors contribute to a drug’s inadequate CNS penetrance.
Therefore, MW150 was subjected to both the classical Caco-2/P-gp screening
system and the more recently developed MDCK/BCRP screening assay.Apparent permeability.Papp(B → A)/Papp(A → B).The data summarized in Table 4 demonstrate
that MW150 has high cell permeability and is not a substrate for P-gp
efflux pump. For apical to basolateral (A → B) permeability,
the test agent is added to apical side and permeation determined by
LC/MS/MS measured on basolateral side; the opposite is done for (B
→ A). P-gp substrate status is then determined by measuring
the effect of the standard inhibitor 1 μM valspodar on bidirectional
flux. The percent recovery of MW150 is 71% and 61%, respectively.
Table 4
Caco-2 Permeability/P-gp Substrate
Summary for MW150
sample
concn (μM)
time (h)
mean A → B Papp (10–6 cm s–1)a
mean B → A Papp (10–6 cm s–1)a
efflux ratiob
notes
MW150
5
2
33.5
31.2
0.9
high permeability
MW150 + valspodar
5
2
27.6
23.0
0.8
not a P-gp substrate
Apparent permeability.
Papp(B → A)/Papp(A → B).
As shown in Table 5, MW150 also has high
cell permeability for MDCKcells and is not a substrate for the BCRP
efflux transporter. The standard inhibitor Ko143 (10 μM) was
used to probe bidirectional flux in this assay. Percent recovery of
MW150 was 66% and 67%, respectively.
Table 5
MDCK Permeability/BCRP
Substrate Summary
for MW150
sample
concn (μM)
time (h)
mean A → B Papp (10–6 cm s–1)a
mean B → A Papp (10–6 cm s–1)a
effiux ratiob
notes
MW150
5
2
20.7
25.1
1.2
high permeability
MW150 + Ko143
5
2
26.1
24.3
0.9
not a BCRP substrate
Apparent permeability.
Papp(B → A)/Papp (A → B).
Apparent permeability.Papp(B → A)/Papp (A → B).The results from molecular and cellular property screening
assays
for MW150 warranted progression to in vivo pharmacological screens.
First, a preliminary screen for oral bioavailability potential was
done in rat. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after intravenous
(iv) and oral (po) administration at 5 mg/kg. Animals were fasted
prior to MW150 administration and up to 4 h post administration. All
animals showed normal activity during the study. The concentration
of MW150 in plasma samples was determined by LC-MS/MS, and the parameters
estimated by a noncompartmental analysis. The screening data show
that MW150 has a half-life in excess of 3 h and an oral bioavailability
of >50%. Second, the pharmacokinetic screening results were used
in
the design of a brain-to plasma ratio screen for tissue penetrance
potential. MW150 was administered at the same 5 mg/kg dose and levels
measured in plasma and brain samples 3 h post administration. The
estimated brain/plasma ratio of >0.9 indicates that MW150 is able
to distribute across the blood-brain barrier. Clearly, MW150 has attractive
oral bioavailability potential, warranting a full dose dependent kinetic
analysis in future investigational new drug development investigations.Prior to analysis for efficacy, MW150 was also screened in a modified
SHIRPA test paradigm[6] to minimize the impact
of unanticipated adverse pharmacology and unintended influences on
the interpretation of behavioral studies. This consensus approach
to filtering for frank adverse pharmacology prior to candidate selection
provides a degree of derisking for future investigational new drug
enabling studies and allows fuller interpretation of animal behavior
studies used as an efficacy end point. Briefly, C57BL/6 mice were
administered saline (control) or MW150 (50 and 150 mg/kg, 20- and
60-fold above the efficacy dose) and clinical observation documented.
Normal individual variances among mice in all groups were observed
in total distance traveled or center versus edge occupancy, but no
differences or adverse events were detected among saline or MW150
treated mice over a 24 h period of observation.We conclude
that MW150 is a chemically stable and orally bioavailable
p38αMAPK inhibitor that exhibits excellent cell permeability,
absence of efflux pump and CYP liabilities, adequate metabolic stability
and possessing minimal risk for adverse pharmacology liabilities.
The aggregate outcomes, therefore, justified in vivo evaluation of
efficacy.
Behavior as Pharmacodynamic Test of in Vivo Efficacy
Memory loss is the clinical hallmark of AD. Most importantly for
drug discovery, the current FDA approved AD drugs used the attenuation
of memory loss as a qualifying end point. We therefore decided to
use a behavioral assessment of memory as the initial pharmacodynamic
readout for MW150 efficacy. Two distinct AD-relevant mouse models
were tested: the APP/PS1 transgenic (Tg) mouse and the APPNLh/NLh × PSP264L/P264L knock-in (KI) mouse. Both models
show synaptic dysfunction and cognitive deficits.[6,27] The
APP/PS1 Tg model overexpresses amyloid-beta (Aβ). It is an amyloid
deposition model in which selective p38αMAPK inhibition has
been linked to attenuation of long-term potentiation (LTP) and cognitive
dysfunction brought about by amyloid-beta (Aβ) stress.[6] In contrast, the geneticAPP/PSKI model uses
endogenous promoters with no overexpression of the amyloid precursor
protein (APP). It reflects physiological levels of APP and is an aging
model that allows testing at either early or late stage pathology
progression.[27]The Tg mouse model
was tested in a preventative paradigm, as previously described.[6] Because both associative and spatial memory are
known to be affected in AD patients, we tested the effects of MW150
on contextual fear learning, a hippocampus-dependent task assessing
associative memory, and in the two-day RAWM task that assesses spatial
memory. Briefly, wild type (WT) and APP/PS1 littermate mice were treated
with MW150 (2.5 mg/kg, oral, daily) or vehicle starting at 8 weeks
of age and continuing until 3–4 months when cognitive impairment
is present. Behavioral assessments were done with the radial arm water
maze (RAWM) and contextual fear conditioning tests as described.[6] MW150 treatment improved the Tg mice performance
in both cognitive tests (Figure 6).
Figure 6
MW150 treatment
suppresses associative and spatial memory deficit
in APP/PS1 Tg mice. Daily oral administration of either saline or
MW150 (2.5 mg/kg) was done from age 8 weeks to 3–4 months.
Associative and spatial memories were then assessed, respectively,
through (A) contextual fear memory and (B) RAWM. Saline treated APP/PS1
mice exhibited cognitive deficits for both types of memory compared
to saline treated-type (WT) mice, as evidenced by a significantly
lower percent of freezing during assessment of fear memory, and by
higher number of errors in the RAWM task. However, treatment of APP/PS1
mice with MW150 resulted in suppression of the deficits, as seen by
the percent of freezing and RAWM performance indistinguishable from
that of WT mice.
MW150 treatment
suppresses associative and spatial memory deficit
in APP/PS1 Tg mice. Daily oral administration of either saline or
MW150 (2.5 mg/kg) was done from age 8 weeks to 3–4 months.
Associative and spatial memories were then assessed, respectively,
through (A) contextual fear memory and (B) RAWM. Saline treated APP/PS1
mice exhibited cognitive deficits for both types of memory compared
to saline treated-type (WT) mice, as evidenced by a significantly
lower percent of freezing during assessment of fear memory, and by
higher number of errors in the RAWM task. However, treatment of APP/PS1
mice with MW150 resulted in suppression of the deficits, as seen by
the percent of freezing and RAWM performance indistinguishable from
that of WT mice.The specificity of a
physiological axis response to therapeutic
intervention is key to relevance of an animal model pharmacodynamic
end point to future clinical studies. Therefore, it is worth noting
additional pharmacodynamic effects of MW150 that provide a firmer
foundation and translational value. Specifically, MW150’s behavioral
effects are selective and consistent with hippocampal mediated mechanisms.
For example, treatment with MW150 did not affect the performance of
WT mice (Figure 6), consistent with MW150 treatment
altering disease-relevant mechanisms instead of a more general effect
on memory. Further, there was no effect on cued fear memory, a hippocampus-independent
type of memory. Other analyses reinforce the disease relevant physiological
axis (Figure 7). For example, the sensory threshold
was similar among different groups of mice, indicating there was no
modification of the ability to perceive the shock (Figure 7). Additionally, MW150 treatment did not influence
the visible platform task, which assesses sensory, motor, and motivational
mechanisms, and did not influence open field tests, which assess locomotor
activity and anxiety (Figure 7C–F).
Finally, the effect of MW150 treatment is dose dependent for behavior
end points (Supporting Information Figure
S2).
Figure 7
Control behavioral analyses for MW150 suppression of associative
and spatial memory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. No difference
was detected between groups when tested for cued fear memory (A),
sensory threshold (B), visual-motor-motivational deficits with the
visible platform test (speed and time to the platform are shown in
(C) and (D), respectively), and exploratory behavior, as shown by
a similar percentage of time spent in the center compartment (E) and
the number of entries into the center compartment (F).
Control behavioral analyses for MW150 suppression of associative
and spatial memory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. No difference
was detected between groups when tested for cued fear memory (A),
sensory threshold (B), visual-motor-motivational deficits with the
visible platform test (speed and time to the platform are shown in
(C) and (D), respectively), and exploratory behavior, as shown by
a similar percentage of time spent in the center compartment (E) and
the number of entries into the center compartment (F).The second AD-relevant mouse model used to test
MW150 intervention
was in older mice where cognitive deficits are already present. The
humanized APP/PS1 KImouse model is driven by endogenous promoters
of the APP and PS1 genes, generating progressive pathology without
overproduction. The KImice exhibit a spatial memory deficit in the
RAWM by the age of 11 months. The deficits can be attenuated by pharmacological
interventions that target cognitive dysfunction brought about by excessive
proinflammatory cytokine production.[28] Treatment
of 11–12 month old mice with MW150 (2.5 mg/kg, ip, daily for
14 days) suppressed the cognitive impairment, assessed by RAWM 3 days
after the last administration. The MW150-treated mice exhibit RAWM
behavior indistinguishable from WT mice (Figure 8).
Figure 8
MW150 treatment suppresses spatial memory deficit in APP/PS1 knock-in
(KI) mice. MW150 administration (A) to APP/PS1 KI mice (2.5 mg/kg;
ip, daily for 14 days; n = 11, gray squares) suppressed
cognitive deficits (B) seen in APP/PS1 KI mice treated with vehicle
(gray circles, n = 12) and was indistinguishable
from WT mice treated with vehicle (black triangles, n = 14). Mice were tested in a 2-day RAWM assay of spatial reference
memory starting 3 days after the last treatment. Cognitive deficits
in the KI mice treated with vehicle were evidenced by a significantly
higher number of errors in RAWM performance compared to KI mice treated
with MW150 (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.005, ###p <
0.001) or WT mice treated with vehicle (*p < 0.05,
**p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001).
MW150 treatment suppresses spatial memory deficit in APP/PS1 knock-in
(KI) mice. MW150 administration (A) to APP/PS1 KImice (2.5 mg/kg;
ip, daily for 14 days; n = 11, gray squares) suppressed
cognitive deficits (B) seen in APP/PS1 KImice treated with vehicle
(gray circles, n = 12) and was indistinguishable
from WT mice treated with vehicle (black triangles, n = 14). Mice were tested in a 2-day RAWM assay of spatial reference
memory starting 3 days after the last treatment. Cognitive deficits
in the KImice treated with vehicle were evidenced by a significantly
higher number of errors in RAWM performance compared to KImice treated
with MW150 (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.005, ###p <
0.001) or WT mice treated with vehicle (*p < 0.05,
**p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001).From the perspective of end points
that reflect the scientific
foundation of currently approved AD therapeutics, the independently
obtained results in two distinct pathology progression models demonstrate
the ability bring about pharmacological efficacy with MW150 repeat
dosing. Further, the results in a battery of behavioral tests are
consistent with a true hippocampus-dependent mechanism of action in
attenuation of memory deficits. Repeat dosing with MW150 did not bring
about any observed adverse events within the targeted physiological
axis or control behaviors in aged or diseased animals. The selective
improvement in cognitive behavior was also brought about with no effect
on amyloid plaque load (Supporting Information Figure S3).[31]
Summary and
Conclusions
MW150 is a unique protein kinase inhibitor with
in vivo efficacy
in two distinct AD relevant models at a low dose with repeat administration
and no observed adverse events in aged mice. Behavior is a complex
and technically challenging end point. This is one motivation for
our performing efficacy testing in independent animal models of AD
related pathophysiology and for examination of diverse behavioral
controls in the experimental design. Overall, the results summarized
here indicate a selective effect of MW150 intervention on cognitive
performance via a hippocampus-dependent mechanism of action, consistent
with prevailing perspectives on humandementia progression and drug
regulatory approval paradigms.We have described a pharmacological
intervention relationship for
a comparatively simple single stressor–single kinase–neuropathophysiology
paradigm, but the availability of MW150 provides an embarkation point
for placing into context the various other roles hypothesized for
activated p38αMAPK in complex CNS disease phenotypes. For example,
MW150 is currently being used to address the potential of attenuating
neuropsychiatric disorder phenotypes involving neuronal p38αMAPK
activation. In the long term, extended application of this unique
protein kinase inhibitor to diverse CNS pathophysiology progression
mechanisms might better inform us about which p38αMAPK mediated
dysfunctions are more tractable for intervention and are more clinically
relevant.MW150 is efficacious when administered either before
full-fledged
pathology is evident or after pathology is already present, reflecting
potential for use in either a prevention mode or disease treatment
mode. The promising outcomes with repeat dosing administration might
be a reflection of MW150’s pharmacological profile and protein
kinase isoform selectivity, or it might reflect parallel pharmacological
action on stress activated glia and neurons in close proximity within
the synaptic pathophysiology unit. While both possibilities are intriguing
and desired, their relative contributions cannot be fully interpreted
based on the results reported here. Regardless, a degree of derisking
for future IND enabling analyses and a potential for use in a polypharmacy
environment, which characterizes complex CNS disease interventions,
are evident in the battery of pharmacological screen outcomes such
as lack of substrate status for key CYPs defined by regulatory guidelines,
good bioavailability potential, promising CNS exposure, and no observed
frank adverse events.Target selectivity is demonstrated by
a variety of approaches,
including large-scale kinome and GPCR screens in conjunction with
cellular target engagement and surrogate pharmacodynamic end points.
The structural basis of MW150 kinome and isoform selectivity appears
to reside in a combination of two key interactions that engage the
p38αMAPK hinge region and a proximal hydrophobic pocket. Hinge
region H-bond engagement is a common theme among the diverse chemical
classes of p38αMAPK inhibitors that exhibit in vivo function.[3,5,6,9] MW150
fulfills this role through use of the pyridine substituent nitrogen
atom. No localized conformational changes are observed with MW150
binding to the hinge region, such as the glycine flip observed with
other promising p38αMAPK inhibitors. The finding is consistent
with previous work[6] that showed this localized
conformational change in the kinase is not required for selective
p38αMAPK inhibition. A second interaction of MW150 with p38αMAPK
is occupancy of a proximal hydrophobic pocket by a vicinal 2-naphthyl
substituent. This pocket is not exploited by ATP, in contrast to the
hinge region engagement which is used by ATP. The shape and space
filling features of the 2-naphthyl group allow extensive filling of
the hydrophobic pocket. A similar pocket is found in other p38MAPK
isoforms and a limited set of other kinases, but the shape and properties
of the hydrophobic pockets in other kinases do not appear as accommodating
of the 2-naphthyl substituent. The pocket accessibility and space
filling features of the 2-naphthyl substituent of MW150, therefore,
appear to add a structure based selectivity filter. Additional interactions
observed among other p38αMAPK inhibitors, such as those resulting
in DFG-out conformations, are not observed in the high-resolution
structure presented here. This finding is consistent with previous
work[2,3,6] that showed
the DFG-out conformation does not always correlate with kinase inhibition
and is not required for isoform selectivity. Overall, the presence
of the vicinal pyridinyl and 2-naphthyl substituents in the context
of the pyridazine scaffold is the most parsimonious explanation of
what MW150 features provide selective target engagement, while MW150
molecular properties[25] and specific aspects
of its first pass metabolism[26] appear to
drive bioavailability and pharmacological exposure in order to deliver
the highly selective in vivo efficacy.In conclusion, the results
presented here add to a body of knowledge
that raises the rational possibility of p38αMAPK inhibitor drugs
for CNS indications might be one in which efficacy, either in a palliative
or disease modifying mode, is a reasonable anticipation. Current perspectives
on p38αMAPK inhibitor drugs are influenced by perceived failures
in some disease indication areas even while others continue to show
promising outcomes.[32,33] In this regard, it should be
noted that drug development termination at the clinical trials stage
is not equivalent to efficacy failure. For example, termination in
clinical development can be due to business decisions on the part
of pharmaceutical companies or to regulatory issues such as a trial
achieving efficacy but not surpassing current standards of care. Such
terminations are distinct from failure to reach the trial efficacy
goals. In this context, the approved AD drugs are acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors and most recent and ongoing clinical trials target the
amyloid pathway and generally fail to reach efficacy. Therefore, an
established standard for attenuation of pathophysiology progression
remains a future goal for the AD field. Additionally, the gap in CNS
kinase inhibitor drug developmnent[25] remains.
In this context, it is clearly worth pursuit of p38αMAPK inhibitors
similar to MW150 as CNS therapeuticcandidates. Further, the promising
pharmacological profile of MW150 also makes it a potential complementary
intervention that might enhance outcomes from prevailing AD therapeutic
development approaches or be used in combination therapies for this
complex disease.
Methods
Synthesis and
Characterization of MW150 for Biological Studies
(Scheme 1)
The experimental detail
for the title compound MW150 is presented here. The synthesis of additional
compounds used in the investigation are presented in the Supporting Information.
N-Methoxy-N-methyl-2-naphthamide
(2)
A mixture of 2-naphthoyl chloride (1, 35 g, 0.18 mol) and N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (21.5 g, 0.22 mol) in dichloromethane
(1L) was stirred, cooled in an ice bath, and treated with diisopropylethylamine
(58 g, 0.45 mol, 81 mL) dropwise over 30 min. The mixture was warmed
to 20 °C over 2 h then stirred an additional 1 h. The solvents
were evaporated, and the residual solid was dissolved in ethyl acetate
(500 mL) and water (500 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed
with 1 NHCl (300 mL), water (300 mL), and brine (200 mL). The organic
phase was dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated to leave
the product as a light tan oil (2, 39.5 g, 100%). Mass
(ESI) m/z 216 (M + H)+.
A solution of 4-picoline (15.6 g, 168 mmol, 16.2 mL) in
anhydrous THF (1 L) under nitrogen atmosphere at −78 °C
was treated with a solution of freshly prepared LDA [from a solution
of diisopropyl amine (25.4 g, 252 mmol, 35.4 mL)] in THF (140 mL)
under nitrogen atmosphere in an ice bath treated with n-butyllithium solution (2.5 M in hexanes, 100 mL, 252 mmol and stirred
for 30 min) over 30 min via cannula. The mixture was stirred at −78
°C for 1 h and was treated with N-methoxy-N-methyl-2-naphthamide (2, 40 g, 186 mmol)
in THF (160 mL) dropwise over 1.5 h while ensuring the temperature
was maintained at or below −75 °C. The mixture was then
allowed to warm to 20 °C over 4 h and stirred an additional 16
h at this temperature. Saturated ammonium chloride solution (100 mL)
was added to the mixture and allowed to stir 30 min. The solvents
were evaporated in vacuo to approximately 20% of the original reaction
mixture volume and the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (1 L)
and water (600 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with
water (600 mL). The product was extracted from the organic layer with
1 NHCl (2 × 300 mL). The combined acid extracts were neutralized
with solid sodium bicarbonate to pH = 8. The precipitated product
was filtered, washed with water (2 × 50 mL), and dried under
vacuum for 16 h to leave a light yellow solid (3, 34.5
g, 83%). 1HNMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.58
(dd, J = 4.4, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.05 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.00–7.84 (m, 3H), 7.66–7.55
(m, 2H), 7.25 (m, 2H), 4.43 (s, 2H). Mass (ESI) m/z 248 (M + H)+. LC/MS Rt =
3.37 min.
A solution of 1-(naphthalen-2-yl)-2-(pyridin-4-yl)ethan-1-one
(3, 34 g, 138 mmol) in anhydrous 1,4-dioxane (750 mL)
under nitrogen atmosphere was treated with sodium hydride (60% in
mineral oil, 6.8 g, 170 mmol) and stirred for 1 h with occasional
venting to prevent hydrogen accumulation. The mixture, which had a
yellow precipitate, was treated with ethyl 2-bromoacetate (28 g, 170
mmol, 18 mL) and stirred for 18 h. A solution of saturated ammonium
chloride (100 mL) was added and the mixture stirred for 30 min. The
solvents were evaporated to approximately 80% of the original volume
and the residue was diluted with ethyl acetate (600 mL) and water
(400 mL). The mixture was filtered through Celite (ethyl acetate wash)
to remove a small amount of yellow precipitate. The organic layer
was separated and the product was extracted with 1 NHCl (4 ×
100 mL). The combined acid extracts were neutralized with solid sodium
carbonate (pH = 9) and the product was extracted with ethyl acetate
(2 × 300 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with
brine, dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The
crude residue (26 g) was used in the next step without purification
or characterization.
A round-bottom flask equipped
with
a stir bar was charged with 6-(naphthalen-2-yl)-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-4,5-dihydropyridazin-3(2H)-one (5, 14.5 g, 48 mmol), water (7 mL),
and DMSO (250 mL). The mixture was stirred and treated with N-bromosuccinimide (42 g, 233 mmol). The reaction mixture
turned yellow and a slight exotherm was noted while all solid contents
went into solution. After stirring for 20 h, the mixture was poured
into a stirring solution of water (1 L) and saturated sodium bicarbonate
solution (500 mL) at such a rate that effervescence remained under
control. The white precipitate that formed was collected on a glass
frit, washed with water (2 × 50 mL), and air-dried to leave product
(6, 13.9 g, 97%). 1HNMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.13 (bs, 1H), 8.55 (bs, 2H), 7.80 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.68 (m, 3H), 7.55–7.45
(m, 2H), 7.16 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (s, 1H). Mass (ESI) m/z 300 (M + H)+. LC/MS Rt =
2.88 min.
A round-bottom flask equipped with a stir
bar
was charged with phosphorousoxybromide (29 g, 102 mmol) and anhydrous
acetonitrile (310 mL). The mixture was stirred until all solids were
dissolved. To this solution was added 6-(naphthalen-2-yl)-5-(pyridin-4-yl)pyridazin-3(2H)-one (6, 13.3 g, 44.5 mmol), and the mixture
was heated to reflux for 18 h. The reaction mixture was cooled in
an ice bath, treated with ice (150 g), and stirred for 1 h. The reaction
mixture volume was reduced to 50% of the original volume by evaporation
under vacuum. The residual mixture was neutralized with solid sodium
carbonate (pH = 9), and the product was extracted with ethyl acetate
(2 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine
(100 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated. The
crude product was purified by silica gel (EM Baker, 230–400
mesh) chromatography eluted with a gradient of ethyl acetate in hexanes
(1:1 to 9:1) to leave the product as a light beige solid (7, 9.6 g, 60%). 1HNMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ
8.59 (dd, 2H, J = 4.3, 1.8 Hz), 8.03 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.85–7.65 (m, 3H), 7.72 (s, 1H),
7.58–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.33 (dd, 1H, J = 8.5,
1.8 Hz), 7.15 (dd, 2H, J = 4.7, 1.8). Mass (ESI) m/z 364 (M + H)+. LC/MS Rt = 3.71 min.
A solution of 6-bromo-3-(naphthalen-2-yl)-4-(pyridin-4-yl)pyridazine
(7, 11.5 g, 32 mmol) in 95% ethanol (170 mL) was treated
with 1-methylpiperazine (15.9 g, 158 mmol, 18 mL) and heated to reflux
for 18 h. Upon cooling to 20 °C, approximately 90% of the ethanol
was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in
ethyl acetate (200 mL) and aqueous saturated sodium bicarbonate solution
(150 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with water (2
× 200 mL). Minutes after the second water wash, the product precipitated
from the organic layer while still in the separatory funnel. The solid
was collected on a medium glass frit via suction filtration, washed
with ethyl acetate (2 × 20 mL), and dried under vacuum (1 mm
Hg) at 50 °C for 12 h. The desired material 8 (MW150)
was obtained as a pale yellow solid (11.5 g, 94%). 1HNMR
(CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.53 (dd, J =
1.7, 4.4 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 1.8,
7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.47–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34
(dd, J = 1.7, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (dd, J = 1.7, 4.4 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (s, 1H), 3.83 (t, J =
4.7, 4.7 Hz, 4H), 2.62 (t, J = 5.0, 5.1 Hz, 4H),
2.39 (s, 3H). Mass (ESI) m/z 382.20
(M + H)+. HRMS (mass) calculated for C24 H23 N5: 381.1953. Found: 381.19603. Elemental analysis
calculated (%) for C24H23N5: C, 75.56;
H, 6.08; N, 18.36. Found C, 73.70 H, 6.31; N, 17.93. LC/MS Rt = 2.58 min, mp 188.5–189 °C.
In a round-bottom
flask fitted with condenser and dry tube, compound 6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-3-(naphthalen-2-yl)-4-(pyridin-4-yl)pyridazine
(8, 9.1 g, 23.8 mmol) was suspended in 95 mL of anhydrous
isopropanol (99.5%, Aldrich) and heated to 89 °C with stirring
until dissolved. To the resulting solution, ultrapure HCl (12 N, JT
Baker Ultrex II, product 6900-05) (2.5 equiv, 5.1 mL, 59.63 mmol)
was added in-portion, inducing formation of solids in suspension.
The resulting solution was stirred at 81 °C for 10 min, cooled
to ambient temperature, and placed on an ice-bath for 2.5 h. The suspension
was then transferred to 4 °C for an additional 10 h. The resulting
yellow precipitate was filtered on a medium frit sintered glass funnel
using a house vacuum, immediately washed three times with ice-cold
anhydrous isopropanol (3 × 35 mL), followed by ice-cold anhydrous
ether (3 × 50 mL), and air-dried using house vacuum for 7 h.
The product was then dried in a glass desiccator containing silica
gel in vacuo until the compound gave a constant weight. Product 9 obtained as a yellow powder (11.12g, 96%), HPLC purity >
98% (LC/MS). ESI m/z (MeOH) 382.2
(M+H)+. 1HNMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.75
(dd, J = 1.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.91–7.83
(m, 6H), 7.58–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.38 (dd, J =
1.8, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (m, 2H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 3.28 (m,
2H), 3.01 (m, 3H). HRMS (mass) calculated for C24 H23 N5: 381.19535. Found: 381.1955. Elemental analysis
calculated (%) for C24H29Cl2N5O2: C, 58.78; H, 5.96; N, 14.28; Cl, 14.46; O,
6.52. Found: C, 58.89 H, 5.89; N, 14.15; Cl, 14.27; O, 7.05. mp 240
°C, decomposes.Aqueous solubility was determined by Absorption
Systems as previously described.[6] Briefly,
1 mg of MW150 powder was combined with 1 mL of buffer to make a 1
mg/mL mixture and shaken on a Thermomixer overnight at room temperature
(22 °C). The pH of the water was also measured before addition
of test compound and after overnight equilibration. The samples were
then passed through a 0.2 μm PTFE syringe filter and diluted
in duplicate 10-, 100-, and 10 000-fold into a mixture of 1:1
buffer: acetonitrile prior to analysis, and assayed by LC-MS/MS using
electrospray ionization against standards prepared in a mixture of
1:1 assay buffer/acetonitrile. Standard concentrations ranged from
1.0 μM down to 3.0 nM.The acid dissociation constant
(pKa) of MW150 was determined by pION
Inc. (Billerica, MA) using both
potentiometric and UV methods as previously described.[6] The cosolvent was methanol, experimental pH range was 1.7–12.8,
assay vials were thermostated at 25 °C, and ionic strength was
0.15 M KCl. Eight titrations were used to calculate the pKa using the Yasuda–Shedlovsky technique.[34] Quality control and calibrants used were phosphate,
0.5 NKOH, 0.5 NHCl, and the FDA approved drug quinine. The pKa values obtained from spectrophotometric experiments
are in excellent agreement with those derived from potentiometric
titrations.Chemical stability was determined by Absorption
Systems (Exton,
PA) as described previously.[6] Briefly,
at a final concentration of 0.001 M at neutral (pH 7), 0.1 NNaOH
(pH 13.0), or 0.1 NHCl (pH 1.0) at 37 °C, conditions were tested,
with samples taken for analysis at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 24 h. MW150 is
chemically stable over a wide range of pH.
Crystallography
and Structure Determination
Experiments
involving target–drug complex formation, data collection, and
data processing were done using the standard operating protocol as
validated previously[6] for the determination
of atomic resolution ligand–kinase crystal structures. Protein
purification[6] was done using a combination
of affinity-based adsorption chromatography (HisTrap; GE Healthcare),
gel filtration (HiPrep 26/10 column; GE Healthcare), and ion exchange
chromatography (Q Sepharose; GE Healthcare).
In Vitro Activity
Large-scale screens for off-target
activity within the kinome were done using the hierarchical screening
protocol described previously.[6] MW150 was
screened in a commercially performed (Millipore Profiler, now Eurofins)
high throughput system that included 301 protein and lipidkinases
representative of all major kinome branches as well as isoforms of
individual families. Substrates were optimized for each kinase. The
final concentration of MW150 in the profiler screen (20 000
nM) was achieved by serial dilution of a DMSO stock solution to the
final assay concentration in 2.0% DMSO/Tris buffer. Preliminary hits
from the profiler screen (<40% kinase activity remaining) were
validated as true positives or false hits by a follow-up determination
of an IC50 value. An estimated K value was determined on confirmed positives with IC50 < 1000 nM. A similar hierarchichal approach[6] was used for functional GPCR agonist and antagonist screens.
The GPCR Profiler screen uses real-time calcium flux FLIPR assay.
MW150 was tested at 12 500 nM for agonist and 10 000
nM for antagonist activity. Similar to kinase profiler, apparent hits
were determined as true positive or false hits by follow-up IC50 determination compared to a control agonist or antagonist
for the given GPCR. Details are provided in Supporting
Information Table S3.MW150 was tested for CYP substrate
status with the standard FDA recommended series of CYPs using the
commercial service provider CEREP (Redmond, WA). MW150 (0.1 μM)
was tested in duplicate against CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9,
CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. For each screen, a reference compound was at
a concentration of 0.1 μM. T1/2 was
estimated from the slope of the linear portion of the curve for compound
remaining (%) versus time, assuming first order kinetics. Inhibitor
status of MW150 with the FDA recommended CYPs (CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2D6,
CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4) was done by Absorption Systems,
Inc. (Exton, PA) using a standardized human liver microsomal assay.
Briefly, MW150 (10 μM) and a CYP-specific probe substrate (at
concentration approximating its Km value)
were incubated at 37 °C for 10–30 min, reactions terminated
and metabolites monitored by LC-MS/MS. Positive controls for each
CYP were performed separately using a known inhibitor. Monoamine oxidase
(MAO) inhibition status of MW150 was determined by Cyprotex (Watertown,
MA) by assaying the ability of MW150 (0.01–25 μM) to
inhibit the conversion of probe substrate kynuramine, using the nonselective
MAO inhibitor, tranylcypromine, as a positive control.Human
plasma protein binding using rapid equilibrium dialysis was
done by Absorption Systems (Exton, PA) in a 96-well dialysis plate
assay for plasma protein binding. Briefly, plasma (300 μL) containing
the test and control articles was loaded into dialysis plate wells
and PBS (500 μL) added to each corresponding receiver chamber,
incubation done for 4 h at 37 °C, and aliquots of both chambers
processed and analyzed by LC-MS/MS.Stability analyses in human
liver microsome (HLM) and rat liver
microsome (RLM) assays were performed by Absorption Systems (Exton,
PA). Briefly, MW150 (1 μM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH
7.4, 5 mM magnesium chloride was incubated at 37 °C in a shaking
water bath after initiation of reaction by the addition of 1 mM NADPH,
and time points taken at 30, 45, and 60 min. Reaction termination
was done by addition of an equal volume of acetonitrilecontaining
0.1% formic acid, samples processed and analyses by LC-HRAMS to monitor
loss of parent compound and appearance of metabolites. Percent of
remaining parent compound is calculated relative to t = 0 min, with assays being done in duplicate. The validation control
(testosterone for human and rat) was assayed by LC-MS/MS using electrospray
ionization. The peak area response ratio to internal standard propranolol
at each time point was compared to the response ratio at time 0 to
determine the percent remaining. Graph Pad (San Diego, CA) was used
to calculate the half-life, and data were fit to a single-phase exponential
decay equation. The intrinsicclearance (CLint) was calculated
based on CLint = k/D,
where k is the elimination rate constant and D is protein concentration.
Cell Based Activity
MW150 inhibition of lipopolysaccharide
(LPS)-induced responses was tested in the murine microglial BV-2cell
line as previously described.[6] Briefly,
cells were treated with either saline vehicle control or 100 ng/mL
LPS (Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium, Sigma-Aldrich:
EU/mg of LPS is 600 000), in the absence or presence of increasing
concentrations of MW150, cells harvested after 1 h of stimulation
for analysis of pMK2 and after 16 h for measurement of proinflammatory
cytokine IL-1β using kits from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD; Gaithersburg,
Maryland).Cell permeability and efflux pump susceptibility
were determined by the standard Caco-2 two-way permeability analysis
in the absence and presence of a known P-gp inhibitor, valspodar,
with monitoring of parent drug by HPLC/MS/MS. Similarly, the BCRP-MDCKcell system was used to determine MDCKcell permeability and potential
substrate status for the efflux pump BCRP (breast cancer resistance
protein) using two-way permeability measurement in the absence or
presence of the known BCRP inhibitor, Ko143, with monitoring of parent
drug by HPLC/MS/MS. The data shown are from experiments performed
as a commercial service by Absorption Systems (Exton, PA).The
Ames test for genetic toxicology potential was done using a
bacterial reverse mutation assay to evaluate the potential of MW150
to induce or reverse mutations with and without metabolic activation.
Briefly, the ability to induce reverse mutations at loci of two strains
of Salmonella typhimuriumTA98 and TA100 was tested.
MW150 was tested ± metabolic activation at concentrations up
to 5 μg/plate. The positive controls, 2-nitroflurene for TA98
and sodium azide for TA100, and vehicle control were within expected
ranges. Data presented are from commercial service assays performed
by BioReliance, Inc. (Rockville, MD).
In Vivo Studies
The oral bioavailability of MW150 after
intravenous (iv) and oral (po) administration in male Sprague–Dawley
rats was done by Absorption Systems (Exton, PA). Briefly, MW150 (5
mg/kg) was administered to male rats (3 rats per treatment group;
total N = 6) using MW01-2-151SRM as an internal standard.
Animals were fasted for a minimum of 12 hours prior to administration
until 4 h post dose. All animals showed normal activity during the
study. Blood was collected via jugular vein cannulation at 5 min,
15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h, and plasma generated and stored
at −60 to −80 °C. Samples were analyzed by LS-MS/MS,
and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a noncompartmental
analysis. The brain-to-plasma ratio in male Sprague–Dawley
rats was determined following a single oral administration of 5 mg/kg.
Plasma and brain tissue samples were collected at 3 h post administration.
Brain tissue was weighed, methanol/water (20:80) added to 4 mL/gram,
and the sample homogenized (4 °C) using a Virsonic 100 ultrasonic
homogenizer and then frozen at −80 °C. Homogenates were
subjected to acetonitrile precipitation and supernatants analyzed
by LC-MS/MS.Behavior as pharmacodynamic test of in vivo efficacy
was performed in two mouse models. The APP/PS1 transgenicmouse (Watterson
et al.[6]) and the humanized knock-in mouse
APPNLh/NLh × PS1P264L/P264L and their WT
controls were used as previously described.[6,27] Repeat
administration was done via intraperitoneal route. In compliance with
animal use guidelines, the number of mice used was minimized by not
administering MW150 to WT mice based on previous results in similar
studies with the APP/PS1 KImice. At the start, each experimental
group contained mice of either sex, with the numbers of males and
females in each group matched as closely as possible. Treatments and
assays were done by personnel who were blind to genotype and drug
treatment conditions.
Authors: Wenhui Hu; Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo; Saktimayee M Roy; Heather A Behanna; Laura K Wing; Lenka Munoz; Ling Guo; Linda J Van Eldik; D Martin Watterson Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Joost C M Uitdehaag; Folkert Verkaar; Husam Alwan; Jos de Man; Rogier C Buijsman; Guido J R Zaman Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Chong-Bin Zhu; Jennifer A Steiner; Jaclyn L Munn; Lynette C Daws; William A Hewlett; Randy D Blakely Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Gerardo A Morfini; Daryl A Bosco; Hannah Brown; Rodolfo Gatto; Agnieszka Kaminska; Yuyu Song; Linda Molla; Lisa Baker; M Natalia Marangoni; Sarah Berth; Ehsan Tavassoli; Carolina Bagnato; Ashutosh Tiwari; Lawrence J Hayward; Gustavo F Pigino; D Martin Watterson; Chun-Fang Huang; Gary Banker; Robert H Brown; Scott T Brady Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lenka Munoz; Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo; Saktimayee M Roy; Wenhui Hu; Jeffrey M Craft; Laurie K McNamara; Laura Wing Chico; Linda J Van Eldik; D Martin Watterson Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Katrin I Andreasson; Adam D Bachstetter; Marco Colonna; Florent Ginhoux; Clive Holmes; Bruce Lamb; Gary Landreth; Daniel C Lee; Donovan Low; Marina A Lynch; Alon Monsonego; M Kerry O'Banion; Milos Pekny; Till Puschmann; Niva Russek-Blum; Leslie A Sandusky; Maj-Linda B Selenica; Kazuyuki Takata; Jessica Teeling; Terrence Town; Linda J Van Eldik Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Christian M Simon; Beatriz Blanco-Redondo; Jannik M Buettner; John G Pagiazitis; Emily V Fletcher; Josiane K Sime Longang; George Z Mentis Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Niels D Prins; John E Harrison; Hui-May Chu; Kelly Blackburn; John J Alam; Philip Scheltens Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 6.982