| Literature DB >> 25676389 |
Saktimayee M Roy1, Valerie L Grum-Tokars1, James P Schavocky1, Faisal Saeed2, Agnieszka Staniszewski2, Andrew F Teich2, Ottavio Arancio2, Adam D Bachstetter3, Scott J Webster3, Linda J Van Eldik3, George Minasov1, Wayne F Anderson1, Jeffrey C Pelletier1, D Martin Watterson1.
Abstract
The first kinase inhibitor drug approval in 2001 initiated a remarkable decade of tyrosineEntities:
Keywords: Signal transduction; chemical synthesis; cognitive dysfunction; crystallography; pharmacology; protein kinase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25676389 PMCID: PMC4404319 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci ISSN: 1948-7193 Impact factor: 4.418
Figure 1Repurposing of a nonkinase CNS experimental therapeutic to CNS kinase inhibitor.
Summary Data Sheet for MW150
| MW (base) | 381.47 |
| MW (hydrochloride hydrate) | 490.43 |
| cLogP | 2.18 |
| PSA | 45.15 |
| chemical stability | stable at pH (1–13), 24 h, 37 °C |
| solubility (hydrochloride hydrate) | >l mg/mL |
| p | 3.83, 7.27; 3.62, 7.27 |
| apparent target affinity | |
| target cocrystal structure | PDB 4R3C; 2 Å |
| kinome target class selectivity | negative except p38αMAPK |
| functional GPCR off-target activity | negative |
| Caco-2 permeability/P-gp substrate | highly permeable; not P-gp substrate |
| MDCK permeability/BCRP substrate | highly permeable; not BCRP substrate |
| human liver microsome stability | |
| human CYP substrate | negative: 1A2, 2B6, 2D6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 |
| human CYP inhibition | negative: 1A2, 2B6, 2D6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 |
| MAO-A/MAO-B inhibition | negative |
| AMES test | negative |
| oral Bioavailability | >50% |
| Brain/plasma ratio | >0.9 |
Scheme 1
Figure 2Stereo view of omit map for MW150 bound in the active site of human p38αMAPK. The map represents the difference electron density (mesh) contoured at 2.5σ. The analysis indicates the goodness of fit between the model and experimental data and is consistent with an energetically favorable conformation for MW150 (purple). Key amino acids in p38α MAPK (green) indicated: Met 109, involved in H-bonding with MW150, and Thr 106, gate-keeper for access to the hydrophobic pocket.
Crystallographic Data and Refinement Statistics for the Human p38αMAPK-MW150 Complex (PDB accession code 4R3C)
| space group | |
| wavelength (Å) | 0.97872 |
| cell dimensions | 65.85, 74.51, 77.80, 90, 90, 90 |
| resolution (Å) | 30.00–2.05 |
| outer resolution | 2.09–2.05 |
| completeness (%) | 99.8 (100.0) |
| 0.062 (0.599) | |
| mean ( | 23.17 (2.37) |
| redundancy | 4.8 (4.9) |
| no. of unique reflections | 24 314 |
| resolution (Å) | 29.93–2.06 |
| 17.5 | |
| 21.6 | |
| RMSD bond lengths (Å) | 0.009 |
| RMSD bond angles (deg) | 1.39 |
Figure 3Human p38αMAPK active site occupancy by MW150 (PDB 4R3C). (A) Connolly surface representation of the active site of p38αMAPK containing MW150. (B) Close-up view of the p38αMAPK hinge region near Met109 (left) and the pyridine substituent of MW150 (right) that are involved in hydrogen bond interaction. The gray mesh represents the experimental 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 1.2σ. (C) Surface created by amino acids within 5 Å of the naphthyl group of MW150. This perspective highlights the volume that the naphthyl substituent of MW150 occupies within the p38αMAPK hydrophobic pocket that is proximal in space to the hydrogen-bonding region shown in panel (B). The blue mesh surrounding MW150 was built from the experimental 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 1.5σ.
Large Scale Hierarchical Kinome Screen
| kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H | kinase | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abl | – | CDK5/p25 | – | EGFR(790M) | – | GSK3β | – | MARK1 | + | PAK5 | – | PKCn | – | Sac(I-530) | – |
| Abl(396P) | – | CDK5/p35 | – | EGFR(790M_858R) | – | Hasplin | – | MELK | – | PAK6 | – | PKCμ | – | Sac(341M) | – |
| Abl(351T) | – | CDK6/eyD3 | – | EphA1 | – | Hck | – | Mer | – | PAR-1Bα | – | PKCθ | – | SRPK1 | – |
| Abl(252H) | – | CDK7/eyH | – | EphA2 | – | Hck act | – | Mer | – | PASK | – | PKCξ | – | SRPK2 | – |
| Abl(315I) | – | CDK9/eyT1 | – | EphA3 | – | H1PK1 | – | Mer(1246H) | – | PEK | – | PKIV2 | – | STK25 | – |
| Abl(253F) | – | CHK1 | – | EphA4 | – | H1PK2 | – | Mer(1246N) | – | PDOFRα | – | PKG1α | – | STK33 | – |
| ACK1 | – | CHK2 | – | EphA5 | – | H1PK3 | – | Mer(1268T) | – | PDOFRα(842 V) | – | PKG1β | – | Syk | – |
| ALK | – | CHK2(15TT) | – | EphA7 | – | IGFIR | – | Mer(1248C) | – | PDOFRα(561D) | – | Plk1 | – | TAK1 | – |
| ALK2 | – | CHK2(145W) | – | EphA8 | – | IGFIR act | – | Mer(1248D) | – | PDOFRβ | – | Plk3 | – | TAO1 | – |
| ALK4 | – | CK1γ1 | – | EphB2 | – | IKKα | – | Mer(1248H) | – | PDK1 | – | PRAK | – | TAO2 | – |
| Arg | – | CK1γ2 | – | EphB1 | – | IKKβ | – | MINK | – | PhKγ2 | – | PRK2 | – | TAO3 | – |
| AMPKα1 | – | CK1γ3 | – | EphB3 | – | IKKe | – | MIKK7β | – | PBK(β) | – | PrKX | – | TBK1 | – |
| AMPKα2 | – | CK1δ | – | EphB4 | – | IR | – | MLCK | – | PBK(γ) | – | PTK5 | – | Tec act | – |
| ARK5 | – | CK2 | – | ErbB4 | – | IR act | – | MLK1 | – | PBK(δ) | – | Pyk2 | – | TGFBR1 | – |
| ASK1 | – | CK2α2 | – | FAK | – | IRE1 | – | Mnk2 | – | PBK(1047R) | – | p38α | + | Tie2 | – |
| Aurom-A | – | CLK1 | – | For | – | IRR | – | MRCKα | – | PBKα | – | p38α106M | – | Tie2(849W) | – |
| Aurom-B | – | CLK2 | – | Fes | – | IRAK1 | – | MRCKβ | – | PBKα(542K) | – | p38β | – | Tie2(Y8978) | – |
| Aurom-C | – | CLK3 | – | FGFR1 | – | IRAK4 | – | MSK1 | – | PBKα(545K) | – | p38γ | – | TLK1 | – |
| Ax1 | – | CLK4 | – | FGFR1(561M) | – | kk | – | MSK2 | – | PBKα′p65α | – | p38δ | – | TLK2 | – |
| Bak | – | cKit | – | FGFR2 | – | JAK1 | – | MSSK1 | – | PBKC2α | – | Ret | – | TrkA | – |
| Bmax | – | cKit(816 V) | – | FGFR2(549H) | – | JAK2 | – | MST1 | – | PBKC2γ | – | Ret(804L) | – | TrkB | – |
| BRK | – | cKit(816H) | – | FGFR3 | – | JAK3 | – | MST2 | – | PIP4K2α | – | Ret(804M) | – | TrkC | – |
| BaSK1 | – | cKit(5603) | – | FGFR4 | – | JNK1α1 | – | MST3 | – | PIP5K1α | – | RIPK2 | – | TSSK1 | – |
| BaSK2 | – | cKit(654A) | – | Fgr | – | JNK2α2 | – | MST4 | – | PIP5K1γ | – | ROCK-I | – | TSSK2 | – |
| BTK | – | CSK | – | Fit1 | – | JNK3 | – | mTOR | – | Pim-1 | – | ROCK-II | – | Txk | – |
| BTK(28H) | – | c-RAF | – | Fx3 835Y | – | KDR | – | mTOR/FKBPI2 | – | Pim-2 | – | Rom | – | TYK2 | – |
| B-Rad | – | cSRC | – | Fx3 | – | Lck | – | MnSK | – | Pim-3 | – | Ros | – | ULK2 | – |
| B-Rad(599E) | – | DAPK1 | – | Fx4 | – | Lck act | – | NEK2 | – | PKA | – | Rse | – | ULK3 | – |
| CaMKI | – | DAPK2 | – | Fins | – | LIMK1 | – | NEK3 | – | PKBα | – | Rsk1 | – | Wee 1 | – |
| CaMKIIβ | – | DCAMK1,2 | – | Fins969C | – | LKB1 | – | NEK6 | – | PKBβ | – | Rsk2 | – | WNK2 | – |
| CaMKIIγ | – | DDR2 | – | Fyn | – | LOK | – | NEK7 | – | PKBγ | – | Rsk3 | – | WNK3 | – |
| CaMKIδ | – | DMPK | – | GCK | – | Lyn | – | NEK9 | – | PKCα | – | Rsk4 | – | VRK2 | – |
| CaMKIIδ | – | DRAK1 | – | GCN2 | – | LRRK2 | – | NEK11 | – | PKCβI | – | SGK | – | Yes | – |
| CaMKIV | – | DYRK2 | – | GRK1 | – | MAPK1 | – | NLK | – | PKCβII | – | SGK2 | – | ZAP-70 | – |
| CDK1/eyB | – | cEF-2K | – | GRK5 | – | MAPK2 | – | p7086K | – | PKCγ | – | SGK3 | – | ZIPK | – |
| CDK2/eyA | – | EGFR | – | GRK6 | – | MAPKAPK2 | – | PAK1 | – | PKCδ | – | SIK | – | ||
| CDK2/eyE | – | EGFR(858R) | – | GRK7 | – | MAPKAPK3 | – | PAK2 | – | PKCe | – | Snk | – | ||
| CDK3/eyE | – | EGFR(861Q) | – | GSK3α | – | MEK1 | – | PAK4 | – | PKCη | – | SNRK | – |
Accession number for each kinase is listed in Supporting Information Table S1.
Hierarchical Kinome inhibitor screen done as described in Methods. p38αMAPK was the only positive (+) hit (H).
Figure 4Concentration-dependent cellular activity of MW150. (A) MW150 treatment suppresses the phosphorylation of MK2, a p38αMAPK substrate whose phosphorylation (activation) is increased in response to LPS activation of glia. Serial dilutions were added to BV2 microglial cells stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS, and the levels of pMK2 at 1 h determined by ELISA analysis. (B) MW150 treatment attenuates the downstream increase in proinflammatory cytokine production, a mechanism of action pharmacodynamic end point. Levels of IL-1β at 16 h were determined by ELISA. Data are expressed as percent of maximal activity (=activity after LPS stimulation + control vehicle treatment) and are representative of at least two independent experiments. Open circle = no LPS + veh; black circle = LPS + veh; gray circle = LPS + MW150.
Figure 5CYP inhibition summary.
Caco-2 Permeability/P-gp Substrate Summary for MW150
| sample | concn (μM) | time (h) | mean A → B | mean B → A | efflux ratio | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MW150 | 5 | 2 | 33.5 | 31.2 | 0.9 | high permeability |
| MW150 + valspodar | 5 | 2 | 27.6 | 23.0 | 0.8 | not a P-gp substrate |
Apparent permeability.
Papp(B → A)/Papp(A → B).
MDCK Permeability/BCRP Substrate Summary for MW150
| sample | concn (μM) | time (h) | mean A → B Papp (10–6 cm s–1) | mean B → A Papp (10–6 cm s–1) | effiux ratio | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MW150 | 5 | 2 | 20.7 | 25.1 | 1.2 | high permeability |
| MW150 + Ko143 | 5 | 2 | 26.1 | 24.3 | 0.9 | not a BCRP substrate |
Apparent permeability.
Papp(B → A)/Papp (A → B).
Figure 6MW150 treatment suppresses associative and spatial memory deficit in APP/PS1 Tg mice. Daily oral administration of either saline or MW150 (2.5 mg/kg) was done from age 8 weeks to 3–4 months. Associative and spatial memories were then assessed, respectively, through (A) contextual fear memory and (B) RAWM. Saline treated APP/PS1 mice exhibited cognitive deficits for both types of memory compared to saline treated-type (WT) mice, as evidenced by a significantly lower percent of freezing during assessment of fear memory, and by higher number of errors in the RAWM task. However, treatment of APP/PS1 mice with MW150 resulted in suppression of the deficits, as seen by the percent of freezing and RAWM performance indistinguishable from that of WT mice.
Figure 7Control behavioral analyses for MW150 suppression of associative and spatial memory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. No difference was detected between groups when tested for cued fear memory (A), sensory threshold (B), visual-motor-motivational deficits with the visible platform test (speed and time to the platform are shown in (C) and (D), respectively), and exploratory behavior, as shown by a similar percentage of time spent in the center compartment (E) and the number of entries into the center compartment (F).
Figure 8MW150 treatment suppresses spatial memory deficit in APP/PS1 knock-in (KI) mice. MW150 administration (A) to APP/PS1 KI mice (2.5 mg/kg; ip, daily for 14 days; n = 11, gray squares) suppressed cognitive deficits (B) seen in APP/PS1 KI mice treated with vehicle (gray circles, n = 12) and was indistinguishable from WT mice treated with vehicle (black triangles, n = 14). Mice were tested in a 2-day RAWM assay of spatial reference memory starting 3 days after the last treatment. Cognitive deficits in the KI mice treated with vehicle were evidenced by a significantly higher number of errors in RAWM performance compared to KI mice treated with MW150 (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.005, ###p < 0.001) or WT mice treated with vehicle (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001).