PURPOSE: Although there is a long history of use of semi-occluded vocal tract gestures in voice therapy, including phonation through thin tubes or straws, the efficacy of phonation through tubes has not been established. This study compares results from a therapy program on the basis of phonation through a flow-resistant tube (FRT) with Vocal Function Exercises (VFE), an established set of exercises that utilize oral semi-occlusions. METHOD: Twenty subjects (16 women, 4 men) with dysphoniaand/or vocal fatigue were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions: (a) immediate FRT therapy, (b) immediate VFE therapy, (c) delayed FRT therapy, or (d) delayed VFE therapy. Subjects receiving delayed therapy served as a no-treatment control group. RESULTS:Voice Handicap Index (Jacobson et al., 1997) scores showed significant improvement for both treatment groups relative to the no-treatment group. Comparison of the effect sizes suggests FRT therapy is noninferior to VFE in terms of reduction in Voice Handicap Index scores. Significant reductions in Roughness on the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kraemer, & Hillman, 2009) were found for the FRT subjects, with no other significant voice quality findings. CONCLUSIONS:VFE and FRT therapy may improve voice quality of life in some individuals with dysphonia. FRT therapy was noninferior to VFE in improving voice quality of life in this study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Although there is a long history of use of semi-occluded vocal tract gestures in voice therapy, including phonation through thin tubes or straws, the efficacy of phonation through tubes has not been established. This study compares results from a therapy program on the basis of phonation through a flow-resistant tube (FRT) with Vocal Function Exercises (VFE), an established set of exercises that utilize oral semi-occlusions. METHOD: Twenty subjects (16 women, 4 men) with dysphonia and/or vocal fatigue were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions: (a) immediate FRT therapy, (b) immediate VFE therapy, (c) delayed FRT therapy, or (d) delayed VFE therapy. Subjects receiving delayed therapy served as a no-treatment control group. RESULTS: Voice Handicap Index (Jacobson et al., 1997) scores showed significant improvement for both treatment groups relative to the no-treatment group. Comparison of the effect sizes suggests FRT therapy is noninferior to VFE in terms of reduction in Voice Handicap Index scores. Significant reductions in Roughness on the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kraemer, & Hillman, 2009) were found for the FRT subjects, with no other significant voice quality findings. CONCLUSIONS: VFE and FRT therapy may improve voice quality of life in some individuals with dysphonia. FRT therapy was noninferior to VFE in improving voice quality of life in this study.
Authors: Eric J Hunter; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Eva van Leer; Miriam van Mersbergen; Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran; Pasquale Bottalico; Mary J Sandage; Susanna Whitling Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Maria Bane; Vrushali Angadi; Emily Dressler; Richard Andreatta; Joseph Stemple Journal: Int J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 2.484
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; John Whyte; Joseph R Duffy; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Patricia Doyle; Shirley Gherson; Lisa Kelchner; Jason Muise; Brian Petty; Nelson Roy; Joseph Stemple; Susan Thibeault; Carol Jorgensen Tolejano Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Maria Bane; Megan Brown; Vrushali Angadi; Daniel J Croake; Richard D Andreatta; Joseph C Stemple Journal: Int J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 2.484
Authors: Leah B Helou; Jackie L Gartner-Schmidt; Edie R Hapner; Sarah L Schneider; Jarrad H Van Stan Journal: Semin Speech Lang Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 1.761
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 2.297