Literature DB >> 25675174

Simplified protocol for focal radiofrequency ablation using the HALO90 device: short-term efficacy and safety in patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Hannah T Künzli1, Dirk W Schölvinck1, K Nadine Phoa2, Erik J Schoon3, Martin H Houben4, Jacques J G H M Bergman2, Bas L A M Weusten1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The standard protocol for focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus comprises two applications of radiofrequency energy, cleaning of the ablated areas and catheter, and two further applications (2 × 15 J/cm(2) - cleaning - 2 × 15 J/cm(2)). A simplified protocol (3 × 15 J/cm(2), no cleaning) proved noninferior to standard protocol for individual islands of Barrett's esophagus, but may be associated with higher stenosis rates when applied circumferentially and sequentially over time. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the above mentioned simplified protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Barrett's esophagus patients undergoing focal RFA using the simplified protocol in four tertiary referral centers were retrospectively included. During each focal ablation, the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was ablated circumferentially in addition to Barrett's esophagus islands or tongues. Sessions continued at 8 to 12-week intervals until complete resolution of Barrett's esophagus. Primary outcome parameters comprised complete remission of dysplasia and of intestinal metaplasia, and stenosis requiring dilation.
RESULTS: 83 patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (median Prague classification C1M3) were enrolled; 66/83 (80 %) had endoscopic resection of a visible lesion before RFA. Intention-to-treat analysis showed complete remission of dysplasia in 78/83 (94 %) and of intestinal metaplasia in 72/83 (87 %). Stenosis requiring dilation developed in 9/83 (11 %), necessitating a median 2 dilation sessions (range 1 - 9), with ≥ 8 sessions in three patients.
CONCLUSION: A treatment algorithm incorporating the simplified protocol of 3 × 15 J/cm(2), with no cleaning, for all focal RFA sessions, appears effective. The associated number and severity of stenoses, however, raises safety concerns. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25675174     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mucosal Ablation in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus: Fry or Freeze?

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Liam Zakko; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Current Controversies in Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Kamar Belghazi; Ilaria Cipollone; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Roos E Pouw
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

3.  Standard versus simplified radiofrequency ablation protocol for Barrett's esophagus: comparative analysis of the whole treatment pathway.

Authors:  Wei Keith Tan; Krish Ragunath; Jonathan R White; Jose Santiago; Jacobo Ortiz Fernandez-Sordo; Mirela Pana; Bincy Alias; Andreas V Hadjinicolaou; Vijay Sujendran; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-22

4.  Comparative outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with different baseline histology.

Authors:  Wei Keith Tan; Arti Rattan; Maria O'Donovan; Tara Nuckcheddy; Bincy Alias; Vijay Sujendran; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; Hasan N Haboubi; Yeng Ang; Philip Boger; Pradeep Bhandari; John de Caestecker; Helen Griffiths; Rehan Haidry; Hans-Ulrich Laasch; Praful Patel; Stuart Paterson; Krish Ragunath; Peter Watson; Peter D Siersema; Stephen E Attwood
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment for Barrett's neoplasia with radiofrequency ablation ± endoscopic resection: results from the national Dutch database in a 10-year period.

Authors:  Sanne van Munster; Esther Nieuwenhuis; Bas L A M Weusten; Lorenza Alvarez Herrero; Auke Bogte; Alaa Alkhalaf; B E Schenk; Erik J Schoon; Wouter Curvers; Arjun D Koch; Steffi Elisabeth Maria van de Ven; Pieter Jan Floris de Jonge; Tjon J Tang; Wouter B Nagengast; Frans T M Peters; Jessie Westerhof; Martin H M G Houben; Jacques Jghm Bergman; Roos E Pouw
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 23.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.