Literature DB >> 25675038

Improving standard of care through introduction of laparoscopy for the surgical management of gynecological malignancies.

Giorgio Bogani1, Antonella Cromi, Maurizio Serati, Edoardo Di Naro, Jvan Casarin, Ciro Pinelli, Ilario Candeloro, Davide Sturla, Fabio Ghezzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact on perioperative and medium-term oncologic outcomes of the implementation of laparoscopy into a preexisting oncologic setting.
METHODS: Data from consecutive 736 patients undergoing surgery for apparent early stage gynecological malignancies (endometrial, cervical, and adnexal cancers) between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed. Complications were graded per the Accordion classification. Survival outcomes within the first 5 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Overall, 493 (67%), 162 (22%), and 81 (11%) had surgery for apparent early stage endometrial, cervical, and adnexal cancer. We assisted at an increase of the number of patients undergoing surgery via laparoscopy through the years (from 10% in the years 2000-2003 to 82% in years 2008-2011; P < 0.001 for trend); while the need to perform open surgery decreased dramatically (from 83% to 10%; P < 0.001). Vaginal approach was nearly stable over the years (from 7% to 8%; P = 0.76). A marked reduction in estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, blood transfusions as well as grade greater than or equal to 3 postoperative complications over the years was observed (P < 0.001). Surgical radicality assessed lymph nodes count was not influenced by the introduction of laparoscopic approach (P > 0.05). The introduction of laparoscopy did not adversely affect medium-term (within 5 years) survival outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for apparent early stage cancers of the endometrium, uterine cervix, and adnexa (P > 0.05 log-rank test).
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of laparoscopy into a preexisting oncologic service allows an improvement of standard of care due to a gain in perioperative results, without detriments of medium-term oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25675038     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xu Cong Ruan; Wai Loong Wong; Hui Qing Yeong; Yong Kuei Timothy Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Application of carbon nanoparticles in laparoscopic sentinel lymph node detection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Jin-Ying Wei; De-Sheng Yao; Zhong-Mian Pan; Yao Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer over the past decade.

Authors:  Tim Wollinga; Nicole P M Ezendam; Florine A Eggink; Marieke Smink; Dennis van Hamont; Brenda Pijlman; Erik Boss; Elisabeth J Robbe; Huy Ngo; Dorry Boll; Constantijne H Mom; Maaike A van der Aa; Roy F L P Kruitwagen; Hans W Nijman; Johanna M A Pijnenborg
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2018-02-27

4.  Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China.

Authors:  Zhen Yuan; Dongyan Cao; Jie Yang; Mei Yu; Keng Shen; Jiaxin Yang; Ying Zhang; Huimei Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Risk model in stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer with positive node after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Zhilan Chen; Kecheng Huang; Zhiyong Lu; Song Deng; Jiaqiang Xiong; Jia Huang; Xiong Li; Fangxu Tang; Zhihao Wang; Haiying Sun; Lin Wang; Shasha Zhou; Xiaoli Wang; Yao Jia; Ting Hu; Juan Gui; Dongyi Wan; Ding Ma; Shuang Li; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.