| Literature DB >> 25674794 |
Leena Hamberg1, Henna Vartiamäki1, Jarkko Hantula1.
Abstract
We tested whether the pairing of selected isolates could be used to increase the efficiency of a decay fungus Chondrostereum purpureum (Pers. Ex Fr.) Pouzar to control hardwood sprouting in Finland. We paired C. purpureum strains efficient in sprout control or highly active in laccase production, and tested the efficacy of their progeny in spout control experiments. This procedure resulted in a strain with an efficacy superior to that of the parental strains. The mortality of birch (Betula pendula Roth. and B. pubescens Ehrh.) 1 cm in stump diameter was 78%, 56% and 9% for the best progeny, the best parental strain and the control, respectively. Mortality was only slightly higher for B. pendula than for B. pubescens but no significant differences were found between the number or maximum height of stump sprouts. Our results showed that cross breeding of this decay fungus is a good alternative in attempts to produce efficient biocontrol agents against hardwood sprouting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25674794 PMCID: PMC4326358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The Breeding Process of the Study.
Chondrostereum purpureum Isolates Collected for Phase 1.
| No. | Isolate | Laccase activity | Municipality/locality | Collected by | Date of isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AL1 | 1 | Alavus, Murronneva | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–07–19 |
| 2 | AL2 | 2 | Alavus, Murronneva | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–07–19 |
| 3 | AL3 | 2 | Alavus, Murronneva | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–07–19 |
| 4 | KY1 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 5 | KY2 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 6 | KY3 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 7 | KY4 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 8 | KY5 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 9 | KY6 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–07 |
| 10 | KY7 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–17 |
| 11 | KY8 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–17 |
| 12 | KY9 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–17 |
| 13 | KY10 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–08–17 |
| 14 | KY11 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 15 | KY12 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 16 | KY13 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 17 | KY14 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 18 | KY15 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 19 | KY16 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 20 | KY17 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 21 | KY18 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 22 | KY19 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 23 | KY20 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 24 | KY21 | 1 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 25 | KY22 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 26 | KY23 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 27 | KY24 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 28 | KY25 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 29 | KY26 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–02 |
| 30 | KY27 | 2 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–14 |
| 31 | KY28 | 3 | Vantaa, Kylmäoja | H. Vartiamäki | 2009–09–14 |
| 32 | JU1 | 2 | Juupajoki, Hyytiälä | A. Uotila | 2009–08–26 |
| 33 | OR1 | 3 | Orivesi | A. Uotila | 2009–09–14 |
| 34 | HA1 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Kortistonkulma | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 35 | HA2 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Kortistonkulma | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 36 | HA3 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Kortistonkulma | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 37 | OH1 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Kivistönkulma | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 38 | OH2 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Kivistönkulma | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 39 | JÄ1 | 2 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 | JÄ3 | 2 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 42 | JÄ4 | 1 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 43 | JÄ5 | 1 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 44 | JÄ6 | 1 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 45 | JÄ7 | 1 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 46 | JÄ8 | 1 | Järvenpää, Paavonpolku | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–06 |
| 47 | PI1 | 3 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 48 | PI2 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 49 | PI3 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 50 | PI4 | 3 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 51 | PI5 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 52 | PI6 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 54 | PI8 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 55 | PI9 | 2 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 56 | PI10 | 1 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 57 | PI11 | 3 | Mäntsälä, Pirjola | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–11 |
| 58 | RU1 | 3 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 59 | RU2 | 3 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 60 | RU3 | 2 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 61 | RU4 | 3 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 62 | RU5 | 1 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 63 | RU6 | 2 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 64 | RU7 | 1 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 65 | RU8 | 2 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 66 | RU9 | 1 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 67 | RU10 | 2 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 68 | RU11 | 2 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
| 69 | RU12 | 1 | Vantaa, Ruskeasanta | L. Hamberg | 2009–10–19 |
All C. purpureum strains were isolated from fruiting bodies on birch stumps (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) in Finland and were heterokaryotic. The two best strains in the laccase activity test are in bold.
a 0: No color reaction, i.e., low laccase activity; 1: slight color reaction; 2: intermediate color reaction; 3: strong color reaction, i.e., high laccase activity on Petri plates.
Breeding Process of the Study.
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progeny | Parent strain/ spore number | Laccase activity | Progeny | Parent strain/ spore number |
| Progeny | Parent strain/ spore number |
|
| R21 | JÄ2/2 × PI7/2 | 3 | R12 | 3.11/1 × HY4/1 | 0.312 / 0.213 | R13 | V22/1 × E+1/1 | 0.474 / 0.332 |
| R31 | JÄ2/3 × PI7/3 | 3 | R22 | 3.11/2 × HY4/2 | 0.282 / 0.191 | R23 | V12/2 × E+1/2 | 0.376 / 0.529 |
| R41 | JÄ2/4 × PI7/4 | 3 | R32 | 3.11/3 × HY4/3 | 0.374 / 0.262 |
|
| 0.323 |
| R51 | JÄ2/5 × PI7/5 | 3 | R42 | 3.11/4 × HY4/4 | 0.204 / 0.134 | R43 | V12/4 × E+1/4 | 0.799 / 0.611 |
| R61 | JÄ2/6 × PI7/6 | 3 | R52 | 3.11/5 × HY4/5 | 0.185 / 0.120 |
|
| 0.304 |
|
|
|
| R62 | 3.11/6 × P4/1 | 0.823 / 0.990 | R63 | V12/6 × E+1/6 | 0.272 / 0.175 |
| R81 | JÄ2/8 × PI7/8 | 2 | R72 | 3.11/7 × P4/2 | 0.771 / 0.600 | R73 | V22/1 × E+1/7 | 0.817 / 0.627 |
| R91 | JÄ2/9 × PI7/9 | 2 | R82 | 3.11/8 × P4/3 | 0.299 / 0.204 | R83 | V22/2 × E+1/8 | 0.959 / 0.759 |
| R101 | JÄ2/10 × PI7/10 | 3 | R92 | 3.11/9 × P4/4 | 0.425 / 0.302 |
|
| 0.153 |
| R111 | JÄ2/11 × PI7/11 | 2 | R102 | 3.11/1 × P4/5 | 0.114 / | R103 | V22/4 × E+1/10 | 0.596 / 0.433 |
| R121 | JÄ2/12 × PI7/12 | 3 | R112 | HY4/6 × P4/6 | 0.327 / 0.225 | R113 | V22/5 × E+1/11 | 0.614 / 0.803 |
| R141 | JÄ2/14 × PI7/14 | 3 |
|
| 0.109 / | R123 | V22/6 × E+1/12 | 0.198 / 0.302 |
| R151 | JÄ2/15 × PI7/15 | 1 | R132 | HY4/8 × P4/8 | 0.813 / 0.637 | |||
| R161 | JÄ2/16 × PI7/16 | 2 | R142 | HY4/9 × P4/9 | 0.361 / 0.251 | |||
| R171 | JÄ2/17 × PI7/17 | 3 |
|
|
| |||
| R181 | JÄ2/18 × PI7/18 | 1 | ||||||
| R191 | JÄ2/19 × PI7/19 | 3 | ||||||
| R201 | JÄ2/20 × PI7/20 | 3 | ||||||
| R211 | JÄ2/21 × PI7/21 | 3 | ||||||
| R221 | JÄ2/22 × PI7/1 | 3 | ||||||
| R241 | JÄ2/24 × PI7/3 | 1 | ||||||
| R251 | JÄ2/25 × PI7/4 | 3 | ||||||
| R261 | JÄ2/26 × PI7/5 | 2 | ||||||
| R271 | JÄ2/27 × PI7/7 | 3 | ||||||
Breeding phase, C. purpureum strain and its spore number in each breeding phase are presented. The best progenies in terms of laccase activity (the strongest color reaction, Phase 1) or in terms of efficacy in sprout control in the field (Phases 2 and 3) three months after C. purpureum application are in bold (see Fig. 2). During Phase 2 the best parent strains based on field experiments were bred and in Phase 3 the best progenies from Phases 1 and 2 were bred. Note: the subscript of a progeny indicates the breeding phase.
a 0: No color reaction, i.e., low laccase activity; 1: slight color reaction; 2: intermediate color reaction; 3: strong color reaction, i.e., high laccase activity on a Petri plate.
b Statistical difference in the number of stump sprouts between the control (cutting only) and the C. purpureum treatment, and the liquid control (inoculum medium spread without C. purpureum) and the C. purpureum treatment, respectively. P-values indicating statistically significant differences are based on generalized linear mixed models. P-values < 0.05 are in bold and those between 0.05 and 0.10 have been underlined.
Fig 2The Effects of Different Treatments on Birch Spouting during Phases 2 and 3.
The number of stump sprouts of birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) per investigated stump one growing season after the treatments a) in Phase 2 (Porvoo in 2009) and b) Phase 3 (Turenki in 2010). C = control, i.e., cutting only; LC = liquid control, i.e., cut stumps were spread with the inoculum medium without C. purpureum; HY4, P4 and 3.11 = the best parental strains of C. purpureum; E+1, R12-R112, R132-R142, V12-V22, and R13-R123 = progenies of C. purpureum strains, see Table 2. Means with standard errors are presented.
Description of the Study Sites Included in the Field Experiment in Phase 4.
| Site | Site type | Topography | Soil | Clear-cutting (year) | Soil cultivation | Spruce saplings planted (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lapinjärvi 67 | MT | Partly sloping | Sand moraine | 2003 | Mounding | 2004 |
| Lapinjärvi 58 | MT | Even | Gravel moraine/stony | 1998 | No | 1999 |
| Lapinjärvi 245 | OMT | Even | Clay/gravel moraine | 1999 | Disc trenching | 2000 |
| Lapinjärvi 349 | OMT | Even | Clay/gravel moraine/peat-covered | 2006 | Disc trenching | 2007 |
| Turenki 93 | OMT | Even | Gravel moraine | 2002 | Mounding | 2003 |
| Turenki 116 | OMT | Even | Gravel moraine | 2004 | No | 2004 |
| Turenki 220 | OMT | Even | Gravel moraine | 2003 | Mounding | 2004/2007 |
| Turenki 241.2 | OMT | Even | Peat | 2003 | Mounding | 2004–2005 |
a MT = Myrtillus type forest, OMT = Oxalis—Myrtillus type forest.
b Windfall spruces on this site.
Differences in Mortality of Birch Stumps between the C. purpureum Strain R53 and Other Treatments.
| Explanatory | Response variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| variables | Mortality in 2011 | Mortality in 2012 | Mortality in 2013 | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| |
| Intercept | -2.001 ± 0.656 |
| -0.196 ± 0.465 | 0.673 | 0.621 ± 0.528 | 0.239 |
| Treatment | ||||||
| -LC | -4.133 ± 1.199 |
| -4.952 ± 0.770 |
| -3.891 ± 0.543 |
|
| -HY4 | -0.639 ± 0.533 | 0.231 | -0.978 ± 0.353 |
| -1.030 ± 0.413 |
|
| -R122 = V12
| -0.538 ± 0.529 | 0.309 | -1.344 ± 0.358 |
| -1.151 ± 0.412 |
|
| -R152 = V22
| -2.070 ± 0.624 |
| -1.763 ± 0.362 |
| -1.596 ± 0.414 |
|
| -R33
| -0.397 ± 0.513 | 0.439 | -0.833 ± 0.347 |
| -0.763 ± 0.412 |
|
| -R93
| -1.395 ± 0.570 |
| -1.662 ± 0.358 |
| -1.456 ± 0.412 |
|
| Stump basal diameter (mm) | 0.112 ± 0.038 |
| 0.077 ± 0.030 |
| 0.022 ± 0.030 | 0.462 |
| Saplings around | -0.040 ± 0.032 | 0.207 | 0.017 ± 0.020 | 0.412 | 0.024 ± 0.023 | 0.303 |
| Tree volume (m3 ha-1) | 0.038 ± 0.008 |
| 0.027 ± 0.006 |
| 0.020 ± 0.007 |
|
The effect of different treatments (C. purpureum strain or liquid control (LC)), the basal area of investigated stumps, the number of saplings and the volume of trees around an investigated sapling on the mortality of birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) stumps in eight regeneration areas of spruce (Picea abies) three months (in 2011), one year (in 2012) and two years (in 2013) after the treatments (generalized linear mixed model results). All stumps have been included in the models. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) for the model coefficients are in bold and indicative results have been underlined (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10). The sign of a coefficient indicates whether an explanatory variable has an increasing (+) or decreasing (-) effect on the mortality of stumps. See Figs. 3a and 4a. Note: the subscript of a C. purpureum progeny relates to the breeding phase (see Table 2).
a Liquid control i.e., cut stumps were spread with inoculum medium without C. purpureum.
b The best parent stain based on an earlier study [13].
c The best progenies from Phase 2.
d The best progenies from Phase 3.
Fig 3The Effects of Different Treatments on Birch Sprouting during Phase 4.
The effects on a) the mortality of stump sprouts (n = 560), b) the number of stump sprouts in living stumps (n = 279), and c) the maximum height of stump sprouts in living stumps (n = 279) of birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) three growing seasons (autumn 2013) after the treatments. Means with standard errors are presented. Statistically significant differences between the C. purpureum strain R53 and other treatments are indicated with an asterisk (p < 0.05) or a dot (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10). See Tables 4–6.
Fig 4Comparison between the Best Progeny and Parent Strain of C. purpureum.
The effects of C. purpureum strains R53 (a progeny), HY4 (a parental strain), and the liquid control (cutting with inoculum medium without C. purpureum) on a) stump mortality (%), b) the number of stump sprouts (in living stumps), c) stump sprout height (in living stumps, cm), and d) the occurrence of fruiting bodies (%) on birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) stumps one, two and three growing seasons after the treatments (Phase 4). Means with standard errors are presented. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between fungal strains R53 and HY4 are indicated with an asterisk and indicative differences (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10) with a dot. See Tables 4–7.
Differences in the Height of Stump Sprouts of Living Birches between the C. purpureum Strain R53 and Other Treatments.
| Explanatory | Response variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| variables | Stump sprout height in 2011 | Stump sprout height in 2012 | Stump sprout height in 2013 | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| |
| Intercept | 46.065 ± 4.588 |
| 75.190 ± 10.645 |
| 112.429 ± 16.939 |
|
| Treatment | ||||||
| -LC | 4.330 ± 3.557 | 0.230 | 3.155 ± 7.444 | 0.674 | 5.965 ± 11.204 | 0.598 |
| -HY4 | -1.704 ± 3.620 | 0.640 | 2.906 ± 7.900 | 0.715 | -5.446 ± 11.974 | 0.652 |
| -R122 = V12
| 0.717 ± 3.668 | 0.846 | -0.057 ± 7.785 | 0.994 | 1.679 ± 11.857 | 0.888 |
| -R152 = V22
| 0.766 ± 3.580 | 0.832 | -9.614 ± 7.727 | 0.221 | -9.347 ± 11.767 | 0.432 |
| -R33
| -2.646 ± 3.692 | 0.478 | -8.554 ± 8.040 | 0.294 | -21.540 ± 12.295 |
|
| -R93
| 2.173 ± 3.644 | 0.554 | -7.848 ± 7.736 | 0.317 | -15.882 ± 11.896 | 0.190 |
| Stump basal diameter (mm) | 1.466 ± 0.205 |
| 2.403 ± 0.454 |
| 3.598 ± 0.725 |
|
| Saplings around | -0.180 ± 0.180 | 0.316 | -0.718 ± 0.396 |
| -1.692 ± 0.611 |
|
| Tree volume (m3 ha-1) | -0.163 ± 0.071 |
| -0.153 ± 0.156 | 0.335 | -0.553 ± 0.229 |
|
| Browsing | -6.459 ± 1.649 |
| 1.263 ± 3.413 | 0.712 | 3.365 ± 6.634 | 0.613 |
The effect of different treatments (C. purpureum strain or liquid control (LC)), the basal area of investigated stumps, the number of saplings and the volume of trees around an investigated sapling, and browsing on the maximum height of stump sprouts of birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) in eight regeneration areas of spruce (Picea abies) three months (in 2011), one year (in 2012) and two years (in 2013) after the treatments (linear mixed model results). Living stumps have been included in the models. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) for the model coefficients are in bold and indicative results have been underlined (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10). The sign of a coefficient indicates whether an explanatory variable has an increasing (+) or decreasing (-) effect on the maximum height of stump sprouts. See Figs. 3c and 4c. Note: the subscript of a C. purpureum progeny relates to the breeding phase (see Table 2).
a Liquid control i.e., cut stumps were spread with inoculum medium without C. purpureum.
b The best parent stain based on an earlier study [13].
c The best progenies from Phase 2.
d The best progenies from Phase 3.
Differences in the Occurrence of Fruiting Bodies in Birch Stumps between the C. purpureum Strain R53 and Other Treatments.
| Explanatory | Response variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| variables | Occurrence of fruiting bodies in 2011 | Occurrence of fruiting bodies in 2012 | Occurrence of fruiting bodies in 2013 | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| |
| Intercept | -2.339 ± 0.752 |
| -2.382 ± 0.570 |
| - | - |
| Treatment | ||||||
| -HY4 | -0.970 ± 0.496 |
| 0.248 ± 0.350 | 0.480 | - | - |
| -R122 = V12
| -0.959 ± 0.511 |
| 0.022 ± 0.350 | 0.950 | - | - |
| -R152 = V22
| -0.698 ± 0.490 | 0.154 | 0.759 ± 0.346 |
| - | - |
| -R33
| -0.678 ± 0.489 | 0.166 | 0.031 ± 0.355 | 0.931 | - | - |
| -R93
| -0.584 ± 0.481 | 0.225 | 0.209 ± 0.349 | 0.549 | - | - |
| Stump basal diameter (mm) | 0.258 ± 0.040 |
| 0.145 ± 0.032 |
| - | - |
| Saplings around | -0.014 ± 0.031 | 0.640 | 0.007 ± 0.023 | 0.752 | - | - |
| Tree volume (m3 ha-1) | 0.012 ± 0.010 | 0.249 | 0.001 ± 0.007 | 0.910 | - | - |
The effect of different treatments (C. purpureum strain), the basal area of investigated stumps, the number of saplings and the volume of trees around an investigated sapling on the probability of occurrence of fruiting bodies on birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) stumps in eight regeneration areas of spruce (Picea abies) three months (in 2011) and one year (in 2012) after the treatments (generalized linear mixed model results). The model for year 2013 was not estimated because the occurrence of fruiting bodies was too low (4%). All stumps except those in the liquid control have been included in the models. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) for the model coefficients are in bold and indicative results have been underlined (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10). The sign of a coefficient indicates whether an explanatory variable has an increasing (+) or decreasing (-) effect on the occurrence of fruiting bodies. See Fig. 4d. Note: the subscript of a C. purpureum progeny relates to the breeding phase (see Table 2).
a The best parent stain based on an earlier study [13].
b The best progenies from Phase 2.
c The best progenies from Phase 3.
Differences in the Number of Stump Sprouts of Living Birches between the C. purpureum Strain R53 and Other Treatments.
| Explanatory | Response variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| variables | Number of stump sprouts in 2011 | Number of stump sprouts in 2012 | Number of stump sprouts in 2013 | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| Coeff. ± SE |
| |
| Intercept | 1.044 ± 0.121 |
| 0.756 ± 0.232 |
| 0.170 ± 0.286 | 0.552 |
| Treatment | ||||||
| -LC | 0.343 ± 0.099 |
| 0.276 ± 0.160 |
| 0.448 ± 0.238 |
|
| -HY4 | 0.155 ± 0.105 | 0.139 | 0.105 ± 0.178 | 0.554 | 0.209 ± 0.258 | 0.418 |
| -R122 = V12
| 0.272 ± 0.105 |
| -0.002 ± 0.177 | 0.991 | 0.240 ± 0.257 | 0.350 |
| -R152 = V22
| 0.271 ± 0.102 |
| 0.212 ± 0.172 | 0.218 | 0.415 ± 0.249 |
|
| -R33
| 0.091 ± 0.107 | 0.391 | -0.126 ± 0.183 | 0.494 | 0.251 ± 0.261 | 0.336 |
| -R93
| 0.130 ± 0.104 | 0.210 | 0.030 ± 0.171 | 0.859 | 0.334 ± 0.251 | 0.184 |
| Stump basal diameter (mm) | 0.044 ± 0.007 |
| 0.029 ± 0.011 |
| 0.024 ± 0.014 |
|
| Saplings around | -0.008 ± 0.005 | 0.141 | -0.021± 0.009 |
| -0.015 ± 0.010 | 0.147 |
| Tree volume (m3 ha-1) | -0.006 ± 0.002 |
| -0.005 ± 0.004 | 0.143 | -0.005 ± 0.003 | 0.125 |
The effect of different treatments (C. purpureum strain or liquid control (LC)), the basal area of investigated stumps, the number of saplings and the volume of trees around an investigated sapling on the number of stump sprouts of birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) in eight regeneration areas of spruce (Picea abies) three months (in 2011), one year (in 2012) and two years (in 2013) after the treatments (generalized linear mixed model results). Living stumps have been included in the models. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) for the model coefficients are in bold and indicative results have been underlined (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10). The sign of a coefficient indicates whether an explanatory variable has an increasing (+) or decreasing (-) effect on the number of stump sprouts. See Figs. 3b and 4b. Note: the subscript of a C. purpureum progeny relates to the breeding phase (see Table 2).
a Liquid control i.e., cut stumps were spread with inoculum medium without C. purpureum.
b The best parent stain based on an earlier study [13].
c The best progenies from Phase 2.
d The best progenies from Phase 3.