Literature DB >> 25674590

Comparative efficacy of fluorescent antibody test, immunoperoxidase test and enzyme linked immuno sorbent assay in detection of rotavirus in cell culture.

N N Barman1, A J Nath2, B K Neog1, G Das1.   

Abstract

Rotavirus is prevalent worldwide and has been established as a leading cause of mortality due to severe diarrhoea in neonates. Isolation of the virus is a gold standard method for confirmation of rotavirus infection in the host. Propagation of rotavirus in cell culture is a challenge as in many instances the virus does not produce detectable cytopathic effect. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of fluorescent antibody test (FAT), immunoperoxidase test (IPT) and sandwich ELISA (S-ELISA) to detect rotavirus antigen propagated in MA 104 cell line. The intensity of fluorescence and colour development for I-FAT and I-IPT was categorized and the ELISA OD values were analyzed. The overall mean of detection were 5.16 ± 0.47, 5.16 ± 0.54 and 5.66 ± 0.33 for I-FAT, I-IPT and S-ELISA, respectively. Significantly less number of samples were positive in the initial one or two passage, which increased up to 100 % from third/fourth passage onwards. The study concluded that I-FAT, I-IPT and S-ELISA were equally effective in detecting propagated rotavirus in cell line, and the former two tests are suitable for in situ demonstration of the virus while the later could be used to assay antigen in cell culture fluid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture; ELISA; FAT; IPT; Rotavirus

Year:  2014        PMID: 25674590      PMCID: PMC4188180          DOI: 10.1007/s13337-014-0196-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virusdisease        ISSN: 2347-3584


  9 in total

1.  A cytoplasmic region of the NSP4 enterotoxin of rotavirus is involved in retention in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Ali Mirazimi; Karl-Eric Magnusson; Lennart Svensson
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 2.  Methods in virus diagnosis: immunofluorescence revisited.

Authors:  C R Madeley; J S M Peiris
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  Rotavirus architecture at subnanometer resolution.

Authors:  Zongli Li; Matthew L Baker; Wen Jiang; Mary K Estes; B V Venkataram Prasad
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Isolation of rotavirus strains from naturally infected piglets.

Authors:  K Sesták; J Musilová
Journal:  Acta Virol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.162

Review 5.  Rotaviruses.

Authors:  M S McNulty
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Comparison of immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining for identification of rubella virus isolates.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; J Dennis; E H Lennette
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Isolation and serotyping of porcine rotaviruses and antigenic comparison with other rotaviruses.

Authors:  E H Bohl; K W Theil; L J Saif
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of two methods for detection of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in feces of pigs with experimentally induced infection.

Authors:  A P van Nieuwstadt; J B Cornelissen; T Zetstra
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Detection of rotavirus-specific IgG antibodies by immunoperoxidase assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  B S Zentner; M Margalith; A Galil; B Halevy; I Sarov
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.014

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.