| Literature DB >> 25674561 |
E David Bell1, Jacob W Sullivan2, Kenneth L Monson1.
Abstract
Cerebral blood vessels are critical in maintaining the health of the brain, but their function can be disrupted by traumatic brain injury (TBI). Even in cases without hemorrhage, vessels are deformed with the surrounding brain tissue. This subfailure deformation could result in altered mechanical behavior. This study investigates the effect of overstretch on the passive behavior of isolated middle cerebral arteries (MCAs), with the hypothesis that axial stretch beyond the in vivo length alters this response. Twenty nine MCA sections from 11 ewes were tested. Vessels were subjected to a baseline test consisting of an axial stretch from a buckled state to 1.05* in vivo stretch (λIV) while pressurized at 13.3 kPa. Specimens were then subjected to a target level of axial overstretch between 1.05*λIV (λz = 1.15) and 1.52*λIV (λz = 1.63). Following overstretch, baseline tests were repeated immediately and then every 10 min, for 60 min, to investigate viscoelastic recovery. Injury was defined as an unrecoverable change in the passive mechanical response following overstretch. Finally, pressurized MCAs were pulled axially to failure. Post-overstretch response exhibited softening such that stress values at a given level of stretch were lower after injury. The observed softening also generally resulted in increased non-linearity of the stress-stretch curve, with toe region slope decreasing and large deformation slope increasing. There was no detectable change in reference configuration or failure values. As hypothesized, the magnitude of these alterations increased with overstretch severity, but only once overstretch exceeded 1.2*λIV (p < 0.001). These changes were persistent over 60 min. These changes may have significant implications in repeated TBI events and in increased susceptibility to stroke post-TBI.Entities:
Keywords: arterial softening; sheep cerebral arteries; stroke; tissue damage; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2015 PMID: 25674561 PMCID: PMC4309201 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1Data from a representative sample showing the definitions of (A) the baseline stress from the initial pre-overstretch baseline test (at 1.03*λ. (●) indicates the undamaged in vivo stress-stretch state.
Figure 2Data from representative samples showing axial stress-stretch responses for overstretch tests and post- overstretch failure tests for the (A) control vessels, (B) 1.1*λ. Note: there is increased softening as the overstretch applied increases. (●) indicates the undamaged in vivo stress-stretch state.
Figure 3Percent decrease in axial . Red error bars indicate SD for each group. Blue line connects group means to clarify trends. (○) indicates individual data points. (*) indicates statistical difference from pre-overstretch values. (#) indicates statistical difference from the group subjected to an overstretch two levels lower.
Statistical summary for .
| Undamaged | Overstretch level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | ||
| IV stiffness (MPa) | 0.65 ± 0.13 ( | 0.70 ± 0.17 ( | 0.57 ± 0.12 ( | 0.36 ± 0.07 ( | 0.18 ± 0.06 ( | 0.13 ± 0.03 ( | 0.07 ± 0.05 ( |
| Tare load stretch | 1.01 ± 0.03 ( | No data | 1.03 ± 0.02 ( | 1.01 ± 0.02 ( | 1.05 ± 0.04 ( | 1.11 ± 0.04 ( | 1.12 ± 0.02 ( |
| Baseline stretch (λ | 1.03 ± 0.001 ( | 1.03 ± 0.005 ( | 1.04 ± 0.001 ( | 1.06 ± 0.006 ( | 1.11 ± 0.02 ( | 1.15 ± 0.007 ( | 1.18 ± 0.03 ( |
| %ΔU | N/A | −1.19 ± 10.5 ( | 11.12 ± 1.84 ( | 32.88 ± 6.03 ( | 49.26 ± 8.63 ( | 56.55 ± 3.14 ( | 59.72 ± 6.71 ( |
Significant .
Figure 4Percent increase in tare load stretch following overstretch. Red error bars indicate SD for each group. Blue line connects group means to clarify trends. (○) indicates individual data points. (*) indicates statistical difference from pre-overstretch values. (x) indicates statistical difference from the adjacent group subjected to a lower overstretch level.
Figure 5Percent increase in axial stretch, as measured at the baseline stress level, following overstretch. Red error bars indicate SD for each group. Blue line connects group means to clarify trends. (○) indicates individual data points. (*) indicates statistical difference from the pre-overstretch mean baseline stretch. (x) indicates statistical difference from the adjacent group subjected to a lower overstretch level.
Figure 6Percent decrease in strain energy under the axial stress-stretch curves, as calculated from initial overstretch test data, and post-overstretch failure test data (data truncated to stop at the previous overstretch level). Red error bars indicate SD for each group. Blue line connects group means to clarify trends. (○) indicates individual data points. (*) indicates statistical difference from the control (non-overstretched) group. (x) indicates statistical difference from the adjacent group subjected to a lower overstretch level.
Figure 7Ultimate stress (A) and stretch (B) for the various overstretch groups, as measured from the final pressurized axial stretch test (pulled to failure). Red error bars indicate SD for each group. Blue line connects group means to clarify trends. (○) indicates individual data points.
Figure 8(A) Data from a representative sample showing the axial stress-stretch curve for the pre-overstretch baseline test, as well as four of the seven post-overstretch baseline tests which were repeated every 10 min for 60 min after overstretch. (B) Means and SD for the various test groups and how these values evolved over time. Note, there was no significant recovery of strain energy following overstretch at any of the tested overstretch levels. [Symbols: (● Control Group, n = 5), (♦ 1.1*λIV Group, n = 5) (x 1.2*λIV Group, n = 5), (▼1.3*λIV Group, n = 6), (▲ 1.4*λIV Group, n = 4), (■ 1.5*λIV Group, n = 4)].