| Literature DB >> 25674467 |
Jaap Dorgelo1, Harm G van der Geest1, Ellard R Hunting2.
Abstract
Here we investigate the allocation of resources between growth and reproduction by surveying the dynamics of natural populations of the aquatic detritivorous mudsnail Potamopyrgus antipodarum from two interconnected lakes that differ in trophic state. The size distributions and reproductive output of the snail populations was analyzed monthly by field surveys spanning 3 years, and in a controlled microcosm experiment to evaluate the reproductive potential under laboratory conditions. Snails in the meso-oligotrophic lake showed reduced growth and a smaller size compared to snails in the eutrophic lake. However, the numbers of eggs and nearly-neonates per adult snail did not differ significantly between the two populations. It is speculated thatEntities:
Keywords: Detritus; Growth; Potamopyrgus antipodarum; Reproduction; Resource allocation; Trophic states of lakes
Year: 2014 PMID: 25674467 PMCID: PMC4320230 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Selected characteristics of the two lakes
| Meso-oligotrophic lake | Eutrophic lake | |
|---|---|---|
| Year created | 1960 | 1967 |
| Surface area (ha) | 70 | 20 |
| Max. depth (m) | 30 | 25 |
| Range 1% light depth (m) | 7–11 | 3–7.5 |
| Range P.PO4 (μg.1-1) | 0–2 | 8–304 |
| Range total P (μg.1-1) | 3.5–17 | 151–365 |
| Range N.NO3 (μg.1-1) | 130–350 | 30–1,400 |
| Max. primary phytoplankton prod. (mg C.m-2.day-1) | 500 | 8,125 |
| Ca2+(mg.1-1) | 61 | 75 |
| Conductivity (μS.cm-2) | 355 | 550 |
| pH* | 8.2 | 7.9 |
Nutrient concentrations at 0.5 m depth. For references see Dorgelo and Gorter (1984).
*taken from Swain et al. (1987).
Figure 1Geographic location of the Maarsseveen Lake system in The Netherlands (from Swain et al 1987). I. Meso-oligotrophic lake I; II. Eutrophic lake II. 1. Locations of population analysis; 2. locations of snails used for brood pouch analysis.
Figure 2Relative distribution of over depth in meso-oligotrophic lake I and eutrophic lake II. Depth in m. Snail abundances (grey areas) are presented as the percentage of the total number collected monthly (indicated by the numbers) to allow comparison of the relative distribution between meso-oligotrophic lake I and eutrophic lake II, in which the grey area accounts for 100% of the sampled time frame for each lake.
Figure 3Dissolved oxygen concentrations (ppm) during summer stratification in meso-oligotrophic lake I and eutrophic lake II.
Figure 4Field data of the two populations in meso-oligotrophic lake I and eutrophic lake II. Upper panel: brood pouch data; means ± S.E.; Nsnails = 25; open dots denote total numbers of embryos; solid dots denote number of nearly-neonates (not counted in 1984); middle panel: monthly relative shell width (in mm) frequency distribution of snails; bottom panel: total snail densities (lake I: N = 20; lake II: N = 10). There was no significant difference in average number of eggs per brood pouch between both lakes (ANCOVA: F = 0.036, P = 0.85). There was also no significant difference in average number of neonates per brood pouch between the lakes (ANCOVA: F = 1.18 =, P = 0.28). A significantly higher contribution of larger (>1.75 mm) snails was observed in the eutrophic lake compared with the meso-oligotrophic lake (GLM-ANCOVA, Tukey-HSD post hoc, P < 0.05). Snail densities in the meso-oligotrophic lake were significantly lower than the eutrophic Lake (t-test; P < 0.05; bottom panel).
Figure 5Development of the populations of in the microcosms, according to the six size classes (in mm). 1. Snails, sediment and water from meso-olgotrophic Lake I. 2. Snails, sediment and water from eutrophic Lake II.