| Literature DB >> 25674405 |
Shrirang Appasaheb Inamdar1, Shripad Nagnath Surwase2, Shekhar Bhagwan Jadhav3, Vishwas Anant Bapat1, Jyoti Prafull Jadhav4.
Abstract
L-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-L-alanine), a modified amino acid, is an expansively used drug for the Parkinson's disease treatment. In the present study, optimization of nutritional parameters influencing L-DOPA production was attempted using the response surface methodology (RSM) from Mucuna monosperma callus. Optimization of the four factors was carried out using the Box-Behnken design. The optimized levels of factors predicted by the model include tyrosine 0.894 g l(-1), pH 4.99, ascorbic acid 31.62 mg l(-1)and copper sulphate 23.92 mg l(-1), which resulted in highest L-DOPA yield of 0.309 g l(-1). The optimization of medium using RSM resulted in a 3.45-fold increase in the yield of L-DOPA. The ANOVA analysis showed a significant R (2) value (0.9912), model F-value (112.465) and probability (0.0001), with insignificant lack of fit. Optimized medium was used in the laboratory scale column reactor for continuous production of L-DOPA. Uninterrupted flow column exhibited maximum L-DOPA production rate of 200 mg L(-1) h(-1) which is one of the highest values ever reported using plant as a biotransformation source. L-DOPA production was confirmed by HPTLC and HPLC analysis. This study demonstrates the synthesis of L- DOPA using Mucuna monosperma callus using a laboratory scale column reactor.Entities:
Keywords: Biotransformation; Continuous culture; L-DOPA; Mucuna monosperma; Response surface methodology
Year: 2013 PMID: 25674405 PMCID: PMC4320180 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
The Box–Behnken design matrix for coded variables along with actual and predicted responses for L-DOPA production
| Std order | L-tyrosine | pH | Ascorbic acid | Copper sulphate | Actual value | Predicted value | Externally studentized residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0.082525 | 0.073007 | 1.524624 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0.152542 | 0.146935 | 0.849911 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.164582 | 0.156311 | 1.296822 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.297604 | 0.293243 | 0.653778 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0.193922 | 0.190677 | 0.483016 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.247224 | 0.241344 | 0.893731 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0.19848 | 0.190482 | 1.24883 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.182934 | 0.172301 | 1.742365 |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0.185856 | 0.186702 | -0.12492 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0.297838 | 0.30429 | -0.98693 |
| 11 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.164582 | 0.16424 | 0.050484 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.25225 | 0.257514 | -0.79525 |
| 13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0.056224 | 0.06576 | -1.52784 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.193774 | 0.949833 |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0.082876 | 0.095211 | -2.1082 |
| 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.200234 | 0.196809 | 0.510363 |
| 17 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.158725 | -1.37812 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0.235885 | 0.235094 | 0.116827 |
| 19 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.137347 | 0.145906 | -1.34827 |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.281356 | 0.280399 | 0.141305 |
| 21 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0.140269 | 0.133925 | 0.969141 |
| 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0.214611 | 0.222782 | -1.27897 |
| 23 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0.073758 | 0.073356 | 0.059289 |
| 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.214112 | -2.55016 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.294 | 0.3012 | -0.78455 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.306 | 0.3012 | 0.516286 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.3012 | 0.970304 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.296 | 0.3012 | -0.56031 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3012 | -0.12785 |
(-1) low level, (+1) high level, (0) center point.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the fitted quadratic polynomial model of L-DOPA production
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | p-value prob > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.161208 | 14 | 0.011515 | 112.4651 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.033347 | 1 | 0.033347 | 325.6965 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.039541 | 1 | 0.039541 | 386.1985 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.000791 | 1 | 0.000791 | 7.730531 | 0.0147 |
|
| 0.003595 | 1 | 0.003595 | 35.1166 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.000992 | 1 | 0.000992 | 9.692514 | 0.0076 |
|
| 0.000845 | 1 | 0.000845 | 8.249136 | 0.0123 |
|
| 0.000148 | 1 | 0.000148 | 1.443396 | 0.2495 |
|
| 0.000174 | 1 | 0.000174 | 1.704024 | 0.2128 |
|
| 0.000673 | 1 | 0.000673 | 6.576955 | 0.0225 |
|
| 0.001185 | 1 | 0.001185 | 11.57416 | 0.0043 |
|
| 0.007211 | 1 | 0.007211 | 70.42724 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.065495 | 1 | 0.065495 | 639.6834 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.025604 | 1 | 0.025604 | 250.0717 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.010209 | 1 | 0.010209 | 99.7092 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0.001433 | 14 | 0.000102 | ||
|
| 0.001253 | 10 | 0.000125 | 2.771251 | 0.1690 |
Figure 1Three-dimensional response surface curve showing the effect of interactions of (a) pH and L- tyrosine, (b) ascorbic acidand L-tyrosine, (c) L-tyrosine and CuSO4, (d) pH and ascorbic acid, (e) pHand CuSO4, (f) ascorbic acid and CuSO4 on L-DOPA production.
Figure 2L-DOPA yield using conditions before optimization and using the medium optimized by RSM. L-DOPA yield after optimization, L-DOPA yield before optimization.
Comparison of L-DOPA production by biological methods
| Method | Rate of production (mg l-1 h-1) | Scale (ml) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.025 | 100 | Chattopadhyay et al. (
|
|
| 0.39 | 100 | Chattopadhyay et al. (
|
|
| 0.39 | 25 | Foor et al. (
|
|
| 1.7 | 500 | Pialis et al. (
|
|
| 1.7 | 500 | Pialis et al. (
|
|
| 7.5 | 100 | Ali et al. (
|
|
| 27.6 | 20 | Vilanova et al. (
|
|
| 48.8 | 100 | Rani et al. (
|
|
| 186.6 | 100 | Surwase et al. (
|
|
| 180.6 | 100 | Patil et al. (
|
|
| 19.31 | 50 | Current study |
|
| 200 | Continuous culture | Current study |
Figure 3Analysis of L-DOPA. (a) HPTLC. 1. Standard tyrosine. 2. Standard L-DOPA. 3. Biotransformation product. (b) Analysis of L-DOPA using HPLC. 1. Standard L-DOPA. 2. Biotransformation product.
Level and range of independent variables chosen for L-DOPA production
| Factor | Variable | Unit | Range and level of coded values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |||
| A | L-Tyrosine | g l-1 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| B | pH | Unit | 3 | 4.5 | 6 |
| C | Ascorbic acid | mg l-1 | 10 | 30 | 50 |
| D | Copper sulphate | mg l-1 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
Figure 4Schematic diagram of laboratory scale column reactor.