Literature DB >> 25673892

Economic Impact of Converting from Pen and 10-mL Vial to 3-mL Vial for Insulin Delivery in a Hospital Setting.

Eby Elizabeth1, Lee Smolen2, Amber Pitts2, Linda A Krueger1, Doneen Grimm3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the impact on acquisition cost and purchased volume of rapid- and short-acting insulins following conversion from 3-mL disposable pens and 10-mL vials to 3-mL vials for individual patient supply (IPS) in a hospital setting.
METHODS: On February 1, 2010, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center of Dignity Health in Phoenix, Arizona, converted from pens to 3-mL vials for IPS subcutaneous (SC) injection and from 10-mL short-acting insulin vials to 3-mL vials for intravenous (IV) preparation. Pharmacy purchasing data were analyzed over 6-month periods before and after conversion (March 1 through August 31, 2009, and March 1 through August 31, 2010).
RESULTS: Before conversion, acquisition costs were $27,866 for 5,335 mL of rapid-acting insulins and $53,336 for 26,310 mL of short-acting insulins. After conversion, insulin acquisition costs were $24,211 for 5,850 mL of rapid-acting insulins (13.1% decrease in costs, 9.7% rise in volume), with cost reduction attributable to the lower cost of 3-mL vials. Acquisition costs were $17,395 for 14,700 mL of short-acting insulins after conversion (67.4% decrease in costs, 44.1% reduction in volume), with cost reduction attributable to lower cost of 3-mL vials versus pens for IPS SC injections and 10-mL vials for IV preparation. The reduction in purchased volumes of short-acting insulins may be partly due to decreased insulin use in IV preparation.
CONCLUSION: Conversion from pens and 10-mL vials to 3-mL vials for rapid-and short-acting insulins resulted in reduced acquisition costs and decreased use of short-acting insulin in IV preparations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-mL vial; conversion; cost; insulin; pens

Year:  2014        PMID: 25673892      PMCID: PMC4319803          DOI: 10.1310/hpj4911-1033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0018-5787


  7 in total

1.  Avoiding problems with insulin pens in the hospital.

Authors:  Matthew Grissinger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-10

2.  Budget impact analysis of insulin therapies and associated delivery systems.

Authors:  Lauren J Lee; Lee J Smolen; Timothy M Klein; Shonda A Foster; Doug Whiteman; James A Jorgenson; Steve Hultgren
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Impact of an interchange program to support use of insulin pens.

Authors:  Leah G Ward; Sara S Aton
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Enhancing insulin-use safety in hospitals: Practical recommendations from an ASHP Foundation expert consensus panel.

Authors:  Daniel J Cobaugh; Gregory Maynard; Lebron Cooper; Patricia C Kienle; Robert Vigersky; Diana Childers; Robert Weber; Stacy L Carson; Melanie E Mabrey; Nicki Roderman; Frederick Blum; Rebecca Burkholder; Marcus Dortch; George Grunberger; Daniel Hays; Rashida Henderson; Jeffrey Ketz; Todd Lemke; Surendra K Varma; Michael Cohen
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 5.  Evolution of diabetes insulin delivery devices.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Selam
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Needlestick injuries in nursing homes: the prominent role of insulin pens.

Authors:  Philippe Kiss; Marc De Meester; Lutgart Braeckman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Patient satisfaction and costs associated with insulin administered by pen device or syringe during hospitalization.

Authors:  Estella M Davis; Carla M Christensen; Kelly K Nystrom; Pamela A Foral; Chris Destache
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.