| Literature DB >> 25673672 |
Deana K Jasper1, Ira M Sigar1, Justin H Schripsema1, Carlyn K Sainvil1, Christopher L Smith1, Laxmi Yeruva2, Roger G Rank2, Ashlesh K Murthy3, Jared R Widder1, Kyle H Ramsey4.
Abstract
We have previously shown that Chlamydia muridarum has multiple genomic variants that concomitantly vary in their in vitro and in vivo phenotype. Herein, we used real-time polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping assays to query plaque-cloned isolates of C. muridarum for the frequency of eight selected polymorphisms. These strains had no history of passage in vivo since their original isolation from laboratory mice. There was significant variance in the frequency of two of the eight polymorphisms assessed with the remaining exhibiting a low rate of variance. To determine if any of these polymorphisms were more favorable for in vivo conditions, we blindly passaged non-clonal C. muridarum three times at 7-day intervals through the urogenital tract of mice. Seven of the eight polymorphisms varied in frequency following in vivo passage and four of these varied between C. muridarum strains. Selected isolates displayed variable growth rates and cytopathic effect in vitro. We conclude that multiple genotypic variants are present within the existing known C. muridarum strains and that the frequency of these variants changes upon introduction into the mouse host. These findings lend support to the concept that genotypic proportional representation in a chlamydial population is dynamic and adaptive.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia; allele; genome; genotype; host; polymorphism
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25673672 PMCID: PMC4399565 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166
Hydrosalpinx rates over time in inbred mice from various suppliers.
| Strain | Suppliers | Percent hydrosalpinx (# of oviducts assessed, # experiments) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Historical - prior to 2006 | Recent - since 2006 | ||
| BALB/c | Harlan Sprague Dawley | 95 (40, 3)a | 73 (40, 2) |
| Charles River Laboratories | nd | 88 (40, 2) | |
| Taconic Laboratories | nd | 78 (40, 2) | |
| C3H/HeN | Harlan-Sprague-Dawley | 83 (219, 8)b | 35 (40, 2) |
| Charles River Laboratories | nd | 50 (38, 2) | |
| Taconic Laboratories | nd | 35 (40, 2) | |
aIncludes observations from unpublished data as well as published findings (Ramsey, DeWolfe and Salyer 2000; Shah et al., 2005; Imtiaz et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010a, b).
Section of non-synonymous SNPs, MNPs and indels assessed for population frequency in this study.
| ORF annotation | Gene description | NT change | AA change | References | Selection (reason) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (chromosome | |||||
| position) | |||||
| TC0052 (59062) | Major outer membrane protein, porin ( | GTT → DEL | C → DEL | Read | No (non-discrimination) |
| TC0052 | |||||
| (59065) | Major outer membrane protein, porin ( | C → T | S → F | Read | No (non-discrimination) |
| - (126406) | intergenic | G → DEL | NA | Read | No (Intergenic, non-discrimination) |
| - (126416) | intergenic | INS → A | NA | Read | No (Intergenic, non-descrimination) |
| - (126475) | intergenic | A → DEL | NA | Read | No (Intergenic) |
| TC0124 (151212) | Transcription repair coupling factor ( | T → DEL | FS | Read | Yes (used as control) |
| TC0138 (169449) | phospho-N-acetylmuramoyl-pentapeptide- transferase ( | INS → TTT | DEL → F | Read | Yes (variability present) |
| TC0155 (187432) | 3`(2`),5`-bisphosphate nucleotidase, putative | G → A | H → Y | Read | Yes (variably present) |
| TC0168 (200671) | Ribosomal protein L34 ( | G → C | T → R | Read | No (not confirmed by PCR) |
| TC0341 (403623) | ABC transporter, permease protein, putative | T → DEL | FS | Read | No (non-discrimination) |
| TC0341 (403626) | ABC transporter, permease protein, putative | INS → C | FS | Read | No (non-discrimination) |
| TC0341 (403652) | ABC transporter, permease protein, putative | T → C | S → P | Read | No (not confirmed by PCR) |
| TC0342 (404884) | ABC transporter, permease protein, putative | A → DEL | FS | Read | Nd |
| TC0408 (468932) | Conserved hypothetical protein | G → T | W → L | Read | No (Not confirmed by PCR) |
| TC0412 (473118) | Conserved hypothetical protein | A → DEL | FS | Read | Yes (variably present) |
| TC0412 (473705) | Conserved hypothetical protein | G → DEL | FS | Read | Yes (variably present) |
| TC0708 (846475) | Conserved hypothetical protein | G → DEL | FS | Read | Nd |
| TC0727 (866121) | 60 kDa outer membrane protein ( | G → T | G → C | Read | Yes (variably present) |
| TC0832 (967487) | DNA polymerase II alpha subunit ( | A → DEL | FS | Read | Yes (variably present) |
| TC0867 (1004276) | Hypothetical protein | T → C | S → P | Read | Yes (variably present) |
Symbols: AA, amino acid; DEL, deletion; FS, frameshift; INS, insertion; NA, not applicable; Nd, not done; NT, nucleotide.
Figure 1.Proportional representation of select polymorphisms in C. muridarum populations changes by strain and following in vivo passage. Each panel represents the qualitative results of rtPCR genotyping reactions targeting the specific polymorphism at each ORF and chromosomal position as labeled (upper-right corner of each panel). The proportional results of the reactions are presented in the bar graphs (allele legend in upper-left corner of each panel). Symbols common to all panels: -, no base at that position in originally sequenced C. muridarum; Del, deletion at that position in originally sequenced C. muridarum; NC, hatched bars (‘no call’ reaction indicating alternative allele not targeted by rtPCR primers is present in that reaction); gray bars—mixed reaction indicating presence of both alleles. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (P-value specified in the text) between groups as determined by chi-square analysis with Yate's correction. Sample size: Nigg in vitro, N = 30; Weiss in vitro, N = 25; Nigg in vivo, N = 38; Weiss in vivo, N = 16.
Patterns of targeted SNPs in C. muridarum isolates in this study.
| Strain (N)1 | Polymorphisms | Frequency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC0124 | TC0138 | TC0155 | TC0412a | TC0412b | TC0727 | TC0832 | TC0867 | ||
| (151212) | (169449) | (187432) | (473118) | (473705) | (866121) | (967487) | (1004276) | ||
| Weiss (13) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | Del | Del | T | Del | NC | .25 |
| Nigg (12) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | Del | Del | T | Del | C | .23 |
| Weiss (7) | Del | TTT/Del | A | Del | Del | T | A | T/C | .132 |
| Nigg (7) | Del | TTT | A | Del | Del | T | Del | C | .13 |
| Nigg (5) | Del | TTT | G/A | Del | Del | T | Del | C | .10 |
| Weiss (3) | Del | TTT/Del | A | Del | Del/G | G/T | A/Del | T/C | .063 |
| Nigg (2) | Del | TTT | G/A | Del | G | T | Del | C | .04 |
| Nigg (2) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | Del | NC | T | Del | C | .04 |
| Weiss (1) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | NC | Del | T | Del | NC | .02 |
| Polymorphisms | |||||||||
| Nigg (17) | Del | TTT/Del | A | A | G | G/T | Del | T/C | .28 |
| Weiss (12) | Del | TTT | G/A | Del | G | T | Del | T | .31 |
| Weiss (7) | Del | TTT | G/A | Del | G | T | Del | T | |
| Nigg (7) | Del | TTT/Del | A | Del | Del | T | A | T/C | .112 |
| Weiss (6) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | Del | Del/G | G/T | A/Del | T | .10 |
| Nigg (5) | Del | TTT/Del | A | Del | Del/G | G/T | A | T/C | .08 |
| Weiss (3) | Del | TTT/Del | G/A | Del | G | T | Del | T | .05 |
| Nigg (2) | Del | TTT/Del | A | Del | Del/G | G/T | A/Del | T/C | .033 |
| Nigg (2) | Del | TTT/Del | A | A | G | T | Del | T/C | .03 |
1Number of isolates of the strain with the stated SNP pattern (by rows).
2Identical SNP patterns at the stated loci in these isolates.
3Identical SNP patterns at the stated loci in these isolates.
Figure 2.Plaque size changes with in vivo passage. Filled circles represent the results for the Nigg strain and open circle represents the results for the Weiss strain. Horizontal bar is the mean for each group at each in vivo passage. The P-values were determined by a two-tailed t test and are shown in the figure for strain comparison at each in vivo passage (N = 58–62 for each strain and passage). Comparing with Weiss plaque size did not change significantly with in vivo passage but the Nigg strain yielded smaller plaques at the first and second in vivo passage (P < 0.001 comparing the first passage with the second in vivo). By the third passage, Nigg isolates had again decreased in size but this did not prove to be significant (P < 0.07).
Figure 3.In vitro phenotypic variance of C. muridarum isolates. The top panel represents the results of a one-step growth rate determination of four isolates. The results shown are that of two experiments, six replicates per isolate per experiment (N = 12). The asterisk (*) in the top panel indicates that variant CM006 growth yielded significantly fewer viable EBs at the same MOI and over the same incubation when compared to the other isolates. The number sign in the top panel (#) indicates that there was also a significantly greater EB yield in variant CM014 when compared to CM022. The bottom panel represents the plaque size analysis of the same variants (one experiment, N = 240). The asterisk (*) in the bottom panel indicates that variant CM005 yielded significantly smaller plaques than all other variants. The number sign (#) indicates that CM006 produced smaller plaques than CM022 (P = 0.038). The table in the bottom of the figure shows the SNP pattern for each of the four C. muridarum variants and the frequency at which they were found in vitro or in vivo.