Literature DB >> 25673104

Helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer: a European single-center experience.

Dirk Van Gestel1, Danielle Van den Weyngaert2, Geert De Kerf2, Bie De Ost2, Olivier Vanderveken2, Carl Van Laer2, Pol Specenier2, Yasmyne Geussens2, Kristien Wouters2, Els Meulemans2, Kin Jip Cheung2, Vincent Grégoire2, Jan B Vermorken2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report on a retrospective analysis of 147 patients with early and locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCCHN) treated with helical tomotherapy (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Included were patients with SCCHN of the oral cavity (OC), oropharynx (OP), hypopharynx (HP), or larynx (L) consecutively treated in one radiotherapy center in 2008 and 2009. The prescribed HT dose was 60-66 Gy in the postoperative setting (group A) and 66-70 Gy when given as primary treatment (group B). HT was given alone, concurrent with systemic therapy (ST), that is, chemotherapy, biotherapy, or both, and with or without induction therapy (IT). Acute and late toxicities are reported using standard criteria; locoregional failure/progression (LRF), distant metastases (DM), and second primary tumors (SPT) were documented, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of HT.
RESULTS: Group A patients received HT alone in 22 cases and HT + ST in 20 cases; group B patients received HT alone in 17 cases and HT + ST in 88 cases. Severe (grade ≥ 3) acute mucosal toxicity and swallowing problems increased with more additional ST. After a median follow-up of 44 months, grade ≥2 late toxicity after HT + ST was approximately twice that of HT alone for skin, subcutis, pharynx, and larynx. Forty percent had grade ≥2 late xerostomia, and 29% had mucosal toxicity. At 3 years, LRF/DM/SPT occurred in 7%/7%/17% and 25%/13%/5% in groups A and B, respectively, leading to a 3-year EFS/OS of 64%/74% and 56%/63% in groups A and B, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The use of HT alone or in combination with ST is feasible and promising and has a low late fatality rate. However, late toxicity is nearly twice as high when ST is added to HT. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Helical tomotherapy; Retrospective analysis; Systemic therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673104      PMCID: PMC4350799          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  45 in total

1.  Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  J P Pignon; J Bourhis; C Domenge; L Designé
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Loss of local control with prolongation in radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler; M J Lindstrom
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Fréderic Duprez; Wilfried De Neve; Werner De Gersem; Marc Coghe; Indira Madani
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields.

Authors:  R Alfonso; P Andreo; R Capote; M Saiful Huq; W Kilby; P Kjäll; T R Mackie; H Palmans; K Rosser; J Seuntjens; W Ullrich; S Vatnitsky
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Dirk Verellen; Lien Van De Voorde; Bie de Ost; Geert De Kerf; Olivier Vanderveken; Carl Van Laer; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

7.  Relationship between radiation treatment time and overall survival after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck carcinoma: a subset analysis of TAX 324.

Authors:  David J Sher; Marshall R Posner; Roy B Tishler; Nicholas J Sarlis; Robert I Haddad; Edward J Holupka; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: how strong is the evidence?

Authors:  Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2005-03

9.  Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Robert Haddad; Anne O'Neill; Guilherme Rabinowits; Roy Tishler; Fadlo Khuri; Douglas Adkins; Joseph Clark; Nicholas Sarlis; Jochen Lorch; Jonathan J Beitler; Sewanti Limaye; Sarah Riley; Marshall Posner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  The treatment outcome and radiation-induced toxicity for patients with head and neck carcinoma in the IMRT era: a systematic review with dosimetric and clinical parameters.

Authors:  Vassilis Kouloulias; Stella Thalassinou; Kalliopi Platoni; Anna Zygogianni; John Kouvaris; Christos Antypas; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Kelekis Nikolaos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.