Literature DB >> 25673101

Implicit learning in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Charles Locurto1, Maura Fox, Andrea Mazzella.   

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the conditions under which human subjects learn patterned information without explicit instructions to learn that information. This form of learning, termed implicit or incidental learning, can be approximated in nonhumans by exposing subjects to patterned information but delivering reinforcement randomly, thereby not requiring the subjects to learn the information in order to be reinforced. Following acquisition, nonhuman subjects are queried as to what they have learned about the patterned information. In the present experiment, we extended the study of implicit learning in nonhumans by comparing two species, cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and pigeons (Columba livia), on an implicit learning task that used an artificial grammar to generate the patterned elements for training. We equated the conditions of training and testing as much as possible between the two species. The results indicated that both species demonstrated approximately the same magnitude of implicit learning, judged both by a random test and by choice tests between pairs of training elements. This finding suggests that the ability to extract patterned information from situations in which such learning is not demanded is of longstanding origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673101     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0167-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  40 in total

1.  Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

2.  Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence.

Authors:  Damian Scarf; Harlene Hayne; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A case for restricted-domain relational learning.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

5.  Sequence learning.

Authors:  B A Clegg; G J Digirolamo; S W Keele
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Learning and memory for hierarchical relationships in the monkey: effects of aging.

Authors:  P R Rapp; M T Kansky; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Implicit learning.

Authors:  C A Seger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Sequential behavior in the rat: a new model using food-reinforced instrumental behavior.

Authors:  Dorothée Domenger; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring Variation Between Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments: Outlining a Meta-Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Antony S Trotter; Padraic Monaghan; Gabriël J L Beckers; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-09-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.