Literature DB >> 25672986

Interruptions and distractions in the gynaecological operating theatre: irritating or dangerous?

Wai Yoong1, Ayemon Khin, Navin Ramlal, Bogadi Loabile, Stephen Forman.   

Abstract

Distractions and interference can include visual (e.g. staff obscuring monitors), audio (e.g. noise, irrelevant communication) and equipment problems. Level of distraction is usually defined as I: relatively inconsequential; II: > one member of the surgical team affected; III: the entire surgical team affected. The aim of this study was to observe the frequency and impact of distracting events and interruptions on elective gynaecology cases. Data from 35 cases were collected from 10 consecutive operating sessions. Mean number of interruptions was 26 episodes/case, while mean number of level II/III distractions was 17 episodes/case. Ninety per cent of interruptions occur in the first 30 minutes of the procedure and 80.9% lead to level II/III distraction. Although no complications were directly attributable to the observed distractions, the mean prolongation of operating time was 18.46 minutes/case. Understanding their effects on theatre environment enables appropriate measures to be taken so that theatre productivity and patient safety are optimised. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: This observational study of 35 elective cases shows a mean interruption rate of 26 episodes/case with 80.9% affecting > one member of operating team, leading to mean prolongation of 18.46 minutes/case. Theatre staff should be aware of these findings and appropriate measures taken to optimise theatre productivity and patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distractions; gynaecology; interruptions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672986     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1005171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

2.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21

3.  Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Camilla Göras; Karolina Olin; Maria Unbeck; Karin Pukk-Härenstam; Anna Ehrenberg; Mesfin Kassaye Tessma; Ulrica Nilsson; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Episodes of strain experienced in the operating room: impact of the type of surgery, the profession and the phase of the operation.

Authors:  Sandra Keller; Steven Yule; Douglas S Smink; Vivian Zagarese; Shawn Safford; Sarah Henrickson Parker
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  The impact of neurosurgical procedure on cognitive resources: Results of bypass training.

Authors:  Antti Huotarinen; Mika Niemelä; Ahmad Hafez
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-04-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.