Andres Enriquez1, Axel Sarrias2, Roger Villuendas3, Fariha Sadiq Ali1, Diego Conde4, Wilma M Hopman1, Damian P Redfearn1, Kevin Michael1, Christopher Simpson1, Antoni Bayés De Luna5, Antoni Bayés-Genís3, Adrian Baranchuk6. 1. Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 2. Servicio de Cardiologia, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain. 3. Servicio de Cardiologia, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain Department of Medicine, Autonomous University Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Insituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Department of Medicine, Autonomous University Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ICCC-Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada barancka@kgh.kari.net.
Abstract
AIMS: A significant proportion of patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) following cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFl). The objective of this study was to assess whether the presence of advanced interatrial block (aIAB) was associated with an elevated risk of AF after CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF that were referred for CTI ablation. Patients were excluded when they had received repeat ablations or did not demonstrate a bidirectional block. In all patients, a post-ablation electrocardiogram (ECG) in sinus rhythm was evaluated for the presence of aIAB, defined as a P-wave duration ≥120 ms and biphasic morphology in the inferior leads. New-onset AF was identified from 12-lead ECGs, Holter monitoring, and device interrogations. The cohort comprised 187 patients (age 67 ± 10.7 years; ejection fraction 55.8 ± 11.2%). Advanced interatrial block was detected in 18.2% of patients, and left atrium was larger in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (46.2 ± 5.9 vs. 43.1 ± 6.0 mm; P = 0.01). Over a median follow-up of 24.2 months, 67 patients (35.8%) developed new-onset AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was greater in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (64.7 vs. 29.4%; P < 0.001). After a comprehensive multivariate analysis, aIAB emerged as the strongest predictor of new-onset AF [odds ratio (OR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-9.3; P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Advanced interatrial block is a key predictor for high risk of new-onset AF after a successful CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: A significant proportion of patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) following cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFl). The objective of this study was to assess whether the presence of advanced interatrial block (aIAB) was associated with an elevated risk of AF after CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included patients with typical AFl and no prior history of AF that were referred for CTI ablation. Patients were excluded when they had received repeat ablations or did not demonstrate a bidirectional block. In all patients, a post-ablation electrocardiogram (ECG) in sinus rhythm was evaluated for the presence of aIAB, defined as a P-wave duration ≥120 ms and biphasic morphology in the inferior leads. New-onset AF was identified from 12-lead ECGs, Holter monitoring, and device interrogations. The cohort comprised 187 patients (age 67 ± 10.7 years; ejection fraction 55.8 ± 11.2%). Advanced interatrial block was detected in 18.2% of patients, and left atrium was larger in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (46.2 ± 5.9 vs. 43.1 ± 6.0 mm; P = 0.01). Over a median follow-up of 24.2 months, 67 patients (35.8%) developed new-onset AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was greater in patients with aIAB compared with those without aIAB (64.7 vs. 29.4%; P < 0.001). After a comprehensive multivariate analysis, aIAB emerged as the strongest predictor of new-onset AF [odds ratio (OR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-9.3; P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Advanced interatrial block is a key predictor for high risk of new-onset AF after a successful CTI ablation in patients with typical AFl. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Antoni Bayés de Luna; Adrian Baranchuk; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Pyotr G Platonov Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Enes E Gul; Raveen Pal; Jane Caldwell; Usama Boles; Wilma Hopman; Benedict Glover; Kevin A Michael; Damian Redfearn; Chris Simpson; Hoshiar Abdollah; Adrian Baranchuk Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2016-12-25 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Antonio Bayés de Luna; Adrián Baranchuk; César Niño Pulido; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Antonio Bayés-Genís; Roberto Elosua; Marcelo V Elizari Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2018-09-02 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Göksel Çinier; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin; Tuğba Yanar Çelik; Özlem Mercan; Halil İbrahim Tanboğa; Muhammed Burak Günay; Ceyhan Türkkan; Mert İlker Hayıroğlu; Bryce Alexander; Ahmet Taha Alper; Adrian Baranchuk Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2018-10-31
Authors: Bryce Alexander; Sohaib Haseeb; Henri van Rooy; Gary Tse; Wilma Hopman; Manuel Martinez-Selles; Antoni Bayés de Luna; Göksel Çinier; Adrian Baranchuk Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2017-12-31