Literature DB >> 25672814

In vitro gastrointestinal digestion increases the translocation of polystyrene nanoparticles in an in vitro intestinal co-culture model.

Agata P Walczak1,2, Evelien Kramer2, Peter J M Hendriksen2, Richard Helsdingen2, Meike van der Zande2, Ivonne M C M Rietjens1, Hans Bouwmeester2.   

Abstract

The conditions of the gastrointestinal tract may change the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (NPs) and therewith the bioavailability of orally taken NPs. Therefore, we assessed the impact of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion on the protein corona of polystyrene NPs (PS-NPs) and their subsequent translocation across an in vitro intestinal barrier. A co-culture of intestinal Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells was exposed to 50 nm PS-NPs of different charges (positive and negative) in two forms: pristine and digested in an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model. In vitro digestion significantly increased the translocation of all, except the "neutral", PS-NPs. Upon in vitro digestion, translocation was 4-fold higher for positively charged NPs and 80- and 1.7-fold higher for two types of negatively charged NPs. Digestion significantly reduced the amount of protein in the corona of three out of four types of NPs. This reduction of proteins was 4.8-fold for "neutral", 3.5-fold for positively charged and 1.8-fold for one type of negatively charged PS-NPs. In vitro digestion also affected the composition of the protein corona of PS-NPs by decreasing the presence of higher molecular weight proteins and shifting the protein content of the corona to low molecular weight proteins. These findings are the first to report that in vitro gastrointestinal digestion significantly affects the protein corona and significantly increases the in vitro translocation of differently charged PS-NPs. These findings stress the importance of including the in vitro digestion in future in vitro intestinal translocation screening studies for risk assessment of orally taken NPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs principle; ingestion; mucus; protein corona; surface modification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672814     DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.988664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  19 in total

1.  Lipid and protein corona of food-grade TiO2 nanoparticles in simulated gastrointestinal digestion.

Authors:  Roxana Coreas; Xiaoqiong Cao; Glen M Deloid; Philip Demokritou; Wenwan Zhong
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-11-03

Review 2.  Microplastics: an emerging threat to food security and human health.

Authors:  Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Simulated Gastric Digestion and In Vivo Intestinal Uptake of Orally Administered CuO Nanoparticles and TiO2 E171 in Male and Female Rat Pups.

Authors:  Ninell P Mortensen; Maria Moreno Caffaro; Shyam Aravamudhan; Lakshmi Beeravalli; Sharmista Prattipati; Rodney W Snyder; Scott L Watson; Purvi R Patel; Frank X Weber; Stephanie A Montgomery; Susan J Sumner; Timothy R Fennell
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  Bioavailability and biodistribution of differently charged polystyrene nanoparticles upon oral exposure in rats.

Authors:  Agata P Walczak; Peter J M Hendriksen; Ruud A Woutersen; Meike van der Zande; Anna K Undas; Richard Helsdingen; Hans H J van den Berg; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Hans Bouwmeester
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 5.  Progress and future of in vitro models to study translocation of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hedwig M Braakhuis; Samantha K Kloet; Sanja Kezic; Frieke Kuper; Margriet V D Z Park; Susann Bellmann; Meike van der Zande; Séverine Le Gac; Petra Krystek; Ruud J B Peters; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Hans Bouwmeester
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Critical review of the current and future challenges associated with advanced in vitro systems towards the study of nanoparticle (secondary) genotoxicity.

Authors:  Stephen J Evans; Martin J D Clift; Neenu Singh; Jefferson de Oliveira Mallia; Michael Burgum; John W Wills; Thomas S Wilkinson; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  Effects of food-borne nanomaterials on gastrointestinal tissues and microbiota.

Authors:  Hans Bouwmeester; Meike van der Zande; Mark A Jepson
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-05-26

8.  The role of biological fluid and dynamic flow in the behavior and cellular interactions of gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Emily K Breitner; Saber M Hussain; Kristen K Comfort
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 10.435

9.  An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Glen M DeLoid; Yanli Wang; Klara Kapronezai; Laura Rubio Lorente; Roujie Zhang; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Nagarjun V Konduru; Maria Ericsson; Jason C White; Roberto De La Torre-Roche; Hang Xiao; David Julian McClements; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 10.  Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment.

Authors:  Pieter Jan Kole; Ansje J Löhr; Frank G A J Van Belleghem; Ad M J Ragas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.