| Literature DB >> 25672586 |
Yun-Gyoo Lee1,2, Eunyoung Lee1, Inho Kim1, Keun-Wook Lee3, Tae Min Kim1, Se-Hoon Lee1, Dong-Wan Kim1, Dae Seog Heo1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cisplatin-associated arterial and venous thromboembolic events (TEEs) are becoming an increasing concern. In patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who are treated using cisplatin-based chemotherapy, we assume that the overall risk of TEEs is high. However, cisplatin-associated vascular toxicity in patients with SCLC has been overlooked to date. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of TEEs in patients with SCLC and to analyze the predictors for TEE occurrence.Entities:
Keywords: Cisplatin; Small cell lung carcinoma; Thromboembolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25672586 PMCID: PMC4614217 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Baseline characteristics and univariate analysis for development of thromboembolic events (TEEs)
| Characteristic | Patient | TEE case | Hazard ratio | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total patients | 277 (100) | 3010.8) | - | - |
| Age group (yr) | ||||
| < 65 | 123 (44.4) | 15 (12.2) | 1 | |
| ≥ 65 | 154 (55.6) | 15 (9.7) | 0.97 (0.47-1.99) | 0.94 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 247 (89.2) | 26 (10.5) | 1 | |
| Female | 30 (10.8) | 4 (13.3) | 1.27 (0.44-3.64) | 0.66 |
| ECOG performance status | ||||
| 0-1 | 250 (90.3) | 26 (10.4) | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 27 (9.7) | 4 (14.8) | 2.33 (0.81-6.75) | 0.12 |
| Smoking status | ||||
| Never smoker | 80 (28.9) | 2 (2.5) | 1 | |
| Ex-smoker | 43 (15.5) | 4 (9.3) | 3.77 (0.69-20.63) | 0.13 |
| Current smoker | 154 (55.6) | 24 (15.6) | 6.03 (1.43-25.54) | 0.02 |
| ACE-27 comorbidity index | ||||
| No comorbidity | 124 (44.8) | 14 (11.3) | 1 | |
| Mild decompensation | 117 (42.2) | 119.4) | 0.95 (0.43-2.10) | 0.9 |
| Moderate decompensation | 27 (9.8) | 3 (11.1) | 1.44 (0.41-5.03) | 0.57 |
| Severe decompensation | 9 (3.3) | 2 (22.2) | 3.09 (0.70-13.61) | 0.14 |
| Khorana variable | 42 (15.2) | 2 (4.8) | 0.45 (0.11-1.91) | 0.28 |
| Prechemotherapy platelet count (≥ 350×109/L) | ||||
| Prechemotherapy hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL or use of ESA) | 6 (2.2) | 0 | - | - |
| Prechemotherapy leukocyte count (> 11×109/L) | 36 (13) | 2 (5.6) | 0.65 (0.15-2.74) | 0.56 |
| BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 | 1(0.4) | 0 | - | - |
| Khorana risk score | ||||
| 1 | 205 (74) | 27 (13.2) | 1 | |
| 2 | 60 (21.7) | 2 (3.3) | 0.30 (0.07-1.25) | 0.1 |
| 3 | 11 (4) | 19.1) | 0.96 (0.13-7.11) | 0.97 |
| 4 | 1 (0.4) | 0 | - | - |
| Khorana risk group | ||||
| Intermediate | 265 (95.7) | 29 (10.9) | 1 | |
| High | 12 (4.3) | 18.3) | 1.04 (0.14-7.68) | 0.97 |
| Stage | ||||
| Limited | 103 (37.2) | 9 (8.7) | 1 | |
| Extensive | 174 (62.8) | 2112.1) | 2.20 (0.99-4.90) | 0.05 |
| Superior vena cava invasion | ||||
| No | 252 (91) | 24 (9.5) | 1 | |
| Yes | 25 (9) | 6 (24) | 2.75 (1.12-6.74) | 0.03 |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ACE, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation; ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; BMI, body mass index.
Treatment outcomesl
| Characteristic | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Initial treatment | |
| Chemotherapy | 211 (76.2) |
| Chemotherapy+radiation therapy | 38 (13.7) |
| Radiation followed by chemotherapy | 28 (10.1) |
| First-line chemotherapy (n=277) | |
| Cisplatin+etoposide | 169 (61.0) |
| Carboplatin+etoposide | 70 (25.3) |
| Cisplatin+irinotecan | 37 (13.4) |
| Carboplatin+irinotecan | 1 (0.4) |
| Second-line chemotherapy (n=155) | |
| Cisplatin+irinotecan | 60 (38.7) |
| Cisplatin+etoposide | 21 (13.6) |
| Irinotecan | 19 (12.3) |
| Topotecan or belotecan | 17 (11.0) |
| Carboplatin+etoposide | 15 (9.7) |
| Carboplatin+irinotecan | 12 (7.7) |
| Others | 11 (7.1) |
| Exposure to cisplatin | |
| No | 59 (21.3) |
| Yes | 218 (78.7) |
| No. of cisplatin cycles | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 6 (5-7) |
| Cumulative cisplatin dose (mg/m2) | |
| Median (interquartile range) | 420 (350-490) |
Fig. 1.Cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events (TEEs) according to chemotherapeutic regimen. HR, hazard ratio.
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for development of thromboembolic events after start of chemotherapy
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | 2.14 | 1.16-3.95 | 0.01 |
| ACE-27 comorbidity | 1.60 | 1.00-2.58 | 0.05 |
| Superior vena cava invasion | 2.25 | 0.91-5.57 | 0.08 |
| Stage | |||
| Limited | 1 | - | - |
| Extensive | 2.19 1 | 0.97-4.95 | 0.06 |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| Non-cisplatin-based | 1 | - | - |
| Cisplatin-based | 4.36 | 1.00-18.97 | 0.05 |
ACE, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation.
As the separate effects of ‘Smoking’ and ‘ACE-27 comorbidity’ (Table 1) did not provide a better model for the data, we assumed a linear trend in these variables which gives a more simple model, and displayed common hazard ratios from one group to the next.