Literature DB >> 25672362

Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition.

Stephanie B M Miller1, Chi-Ting Ho1, Juliane Winkler1, Maria Khokhrina1, Annett Neuner2, Mohamed Y H Mohamed1, D Lys Guilbride2, Karsten Richter3, Michael Lisby4, Elmar Schiebel2, Axel Mogk5, Bernd Bukau5.   

Abstract

Disruption of the functional protein balance in living cells activates protective quality control systems to repair damaged proteins or sequester potentially cytotoxic misfolded proteins into aggregates. The established model based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicates that aggregating proteins in the cytosol of eukaryotic cells partition between cytosolic juxtanuclear (JUNQ) and peripheral deposits. Substrate ubiquitination acts as the sorting principle determining JUNQ deposition and subsequent degradation. Here, we show that JUNQ unexpectedly resides inside the nucleus, defining a new intranuclear quality control compartment, INQ, for the deposition of both nuclear and cytosolic misfolded proteins, irrespective of ubiquitination. Deposition of misfolded cytosolic proteins at INQ involves chaperone-assisted nuclear import via nuclear pores. The compartment-specific aggregases, Btn2 (nuclear) and Hsp42 (cytosolic), direct protein deposition to nuclear INQ and cytosolic (CytoQ) sites, respectively. Intriguingly, Btn2 is transiently induced by both protein folding stress and DNA replication stress, with DNA surveillance proteins accumulating at INQ. Our data therefore reveal a bipartite, inter-compartmental protein quality control system linked to DNA surveillance via INQ and Btn2.
© 2015 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chaperones; protein aggregation; protein disaggregation; proteostasis; ubiquitin–proteasome system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672362      PMCID: PMC4369314          DOI: 10.15252/embj.201489524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  50 in total

Review 1.  The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport.

Authors:  Susan R Wente; Michael P Rout
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Degradation of misfolded protein in the cytoplasm is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1.

Authors:  Frederik Eisele; Dieter H Wolf
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1.

Authors:  Jarrod W Heck; Samantha K Cheung; Randolph Y Hampton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis.

Authors:  F Ulrich Hartl; Andreas Bracher; Manajit Hayer-Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Cellular strategies of protein quality control.

Authors:  Bryan Chen; Marco Retzlaff; Thomas Roos; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 6.  Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation.

Authors:  Jens Tyedmers; Axel Mogk; Bernd Bukau
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Firefly luciferase mutants as sensors of proteome stress.

Authors:  Rajat Gupta; Prasad Kasturi; Andreas Bracher; Christian Loew; Min Zheng; Adriana Villella; Dan Garza; F Ulrich Hartl; Swasti Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  The complete spectrum of yeast chromosome instability genes identifies candidate CIN cancer genes and functional roles for ASTRA complex components.

Authors:  Peter C Stirling; Michelle S Bloom; Tejomayee Solanki-Patil; Stephanie Smith; Payal Sipahimalani; Zhijian Li; Megan Kofoed; Shay Ben-Aroya; Kyungjae Myung; Philip Hieter
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Exposed hydrophobicity is a key determinant of nuclear quality control degradation.

Authors:  Eric K Fredrickson; Joel C Rosenbaum; Melissa N Locke; Thomas I Milac; Richard G Gardner
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sebastian Specht; Stephanie B M Miller; Axel Mogk; Bernd Bukau
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  106 in total

Review 1.  The discovery and consequences of the central role of the nervous system in the control of protein homeostasis.

Authors:  Veena Prahlad
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.250

2.  An aggregation-prone mutant of eIF3a forms reversible assemblies escaping spatial control in exponentially growing yeast cells.

Authors:  Lenka Senohrabkova; Ivana Malcova; Jiri Hasek
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 3.  Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins as an active chaperone-mediated process during heat stress.

Authors:  Susanna Boronat; Margarita Cabrera; Elena Hidalgo
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 4.  Role of sHsps in organizing cytosolic protein aggregation and disaggregation.

Authors:  Axel Mogk; Bernd Bukau
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 5.  The Upsides and Downsides of Organelle Interconnectivity.

Authors:  Daniel E Gottschling; Thomas Nyström
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Protein quality control in the nucleus.

Authors:  Ramon D Jones; Richard G Gardner
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 7.  Protein aggregation as a mechanism of adaptive cellular responses.

Authors:  Juha Saarikangas; Yves Barral
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Hsp90 Maintains Proteostasis of the Galactose Utilization Pathway To Prevent Cell Lethality.

Authors:  Rajaneesh Karimpurath Gopinath; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Biomolecular Assemblies: Moving from Observation to Predictive Design.

Authors:  Corey J Wilson; Andreas S Bommarius; Julie A Champion; Yury O Chernoff; David G Lynn; Anant K Paravastu; Chen Liang; Ming-Chien Hsieh; Jennifer M Heemstra
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Anti-Prion Systems in Yeast and Inositol Polyphosphates.

Authors:  Reed B Wickner; Evgeny E Bezsonov; Moonil Son; Mathieu Ducatez; Morgan DeWilde; Herman K Edskes
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.