Timothy J Zumwalt1,2,3, Mildred Arnold1, Ajay Goel1, C Richard Boland1. 1. Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Laboratory, Baylor Research Institute and Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 2. Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA. 3. Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Abstract
Transcriptional expression of CXCR3 and CCR5 cognate chemokines correlate with CD8+ T-cell infiltration and prolonged survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). These findings were derived mainly from paraffin embedded tissues; thus little is known about the secretion pattern of CD8+ T-cell targeting chemokines from CRCs. Therefore, we developed and introduced a novel platform that assesses the immune mediators that are secreted from live excised tissues. Transcriptional profiling and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 43 CRCs based on expression of genes that represent the adaptive immune response were used to predict tumors that are strong secretors of T-cell targeting chemokines. Secretion of these mediators were corroborated using flow cytometric analysis of T-cell lineage markers: CD4, CD8, IFN-γ, and GzmB. We demonstrate that stronger secretion of CXCL10 (CXCR3 ligand) and CCL5 (CCR5 ligand) and infiltration of GzmB+CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and IFN-γ+CD4+ helper T-cells can be predicted by transcriptional profiling, and that CRCs with stronger T-cell immunity were proportionally skewed towards early TNM stages and lacked distant organ metastasis. Our study represents the first functional analysis of secreted immune mediators from CRCs beyond immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR, and observed active physiological interactions between the tumor cells and the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
Transcriptional expression of CXCR3 and CCR5 cognate chemokines correlate with CD8+ T-cell infiltration and prolonged survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). These findings were derived mainly from paraffin embedded tissues; thus little is known about the secretion pattern of CD8+ T-cell targeting chemokines from CRCs. Therefore, we developed and introduced a novel platform that assesses the immune mediators that are secreted from live excised tissues. Transcriptional profiling and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 43 CRCs based on expression of genes that represent the adaptive immune response were used to predict tumors that are strong secretors of T-cell targeting chemokines. Secretion of these mediators were corroborated using flow cytometric analysis of T-cell lineage markers: CD4, CD8, IFN-γ, and GzmB. We demonstrate that stronger secretion of CXCL10 (CXCR3 ligand) and CCL5 (CCR5 ligand) and infiltration of GzmB+CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and IFN-γ+CD4+ helper T-cells can be predicted by transcriptional profiling, and that CRCs with stronger T-cell immunity were proportionally skewed towards early TNM stages and lacked distant organ metastasis. Our study represents the first functional analysis of secreted immune mediators from CRCs beyond immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR, and observed active physiological interactions between the tumor cells and the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
Tumor-targeting T-cells have attracted considerable attention over recent years since
first demonstrated as beneficial for rectal cancerpatients [1]. The variety of T-cell subsets that can infiltrate tumors
confound the relationship between tumor-infiltrating T-cells and clinical outcome,
i.e. the type and density of tumor infiltrating T-cells varies
among colorectal tumors and affects metastasis and disease [2-8]. Therefore, a clearer
understanding of the immune mediators that dictate T-cell infiltration into the
tumor microenvironment (TME) will allow more targeted approaches be tailored for
each patient.The current perception of T-cell infiltration in colorectal TMEs is mainly derived
from transcriptional studies and low dimensional immunohistochemistry (IHC)
generated from paraffin embedded tissues, usually in the form of tissue microarrays,
which limit each antibody to a small amount of tissue [6-9]. Although these
transcriptional studies have identified biomarkers that predict disease progression,
they fail to correlate active secretion of immune mediators with functional and
living infiltrating T-cells and risk reporting biomarkers that may be phenotypically
irrelevant. At the same time, while IHC provides spatial discrimination of T-cell
infiltrates, it lacks the ability to multi-dimensionally distinguish T-cell subsets
that are functionally active [10]. Therefore
studying only fixed cells has created a major knowledge gap that highlights the
imperative need to assess secreted mediators from live colorectal tumors and to
determine whether transcriptional studies are actually translatable to real
phenomena.CD8+ T-cells develop into cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and
eliminate neoplastic cells by releasing cytotoxic mediators, such as granzyme B
(GzmB) and granulysin (Gnly). Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) recruits and activates
immune cells through upregulation of adhesion molecules and transcription of
IFN-γ-response genes [11, 12]. Type-1 CD4+ helper
T-cells (TH1 cells) polarize from naïve T-cells upon stimulation
by interleukin (IL)-12 and upregulation of T-box 21 (TBX21) and
mediate CTL proliferation and activation, tumor-rejecting immunity, cellular immune
responses, and acute inflammation by secreting IL-2, IFN-γ, and tumornecrosis factor (TNF) [13, 14]. Therefore, expression of type-1 T-cell
associated genes CD8A, GZMB,
TBX21, IL12RB1, IL12RB2,
CCR5, IFN-γ, interferon regulatory
factor 1 (IRF1), and signal transducer and activator of
transcription 1 (STAT1) and the strength of the type-1 response in
the TME inversely correlate with tumor relapse and early signs of metastasis [2, 5,
7, 8].Chemokines are part of a complex network of inflammatory mediators that dictate the
type and density of the T-cell population in sites of inflammation [14]. IFN-γ induces (C-X-C motif)
receptor 3 (CXCR3) ligands (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) to target and attract CTLs
and active TH1 cells [15-19]. Additionally, CCL5 is critical for T-cell
chemotaxis and infiltration as suggested by its receptor (C-C motif) receptor 5
(CCR5) co-expressing with CXCR3 on CTLs in the invasive margin of colorectal tumors.
The expression of both receptors has been linked with CTL infiltration and the
absence of metastasis [20-22]. Further transcriptional studies have
identified specific chemokines (CX3CL1, CXCL9,
CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5, and
CCL11) and adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion
molecule 1 (ICAM1) as closely associated with T-cell densities and
better survival [9]. Two other ligands of
CCR5, CCL3 and CCL4, are also highly transcribed in colorectal cancers (CRCs) [21]. Many of these biomarkers have been
suggested to represent the type-1 T-cell response, and supplement TNM staging and
prognosis [4, 9, 23].In this study we introduced a novel method that identified the chemokines that are
most likely to attract CD8+ T-cells to the tumor by evaluating the
magnitude of secretion from live CRC tissues. The analytical power of this method is
reflected by three observations: early stage tumors secreted more IFN-γ when
compared to late stage tumors, CRCs with increased type-1 T-cell activity strongly
secreted both CXCL10 and CCL5, and infiltration of functionally active
GzmB+ CD8+ T-cells positively correlated
with both the T-cell targeting chemokines. This novel platform utilizes multiplex
immunoassays that can improve disease evaluation, identify the immune mediators that
are biologically relevant, and be used to improve development of future
immunotherapies in cancer by evaluating a more complete milieu of tumor and immune
cells.
RESULTS
CRCs demonstrate two major patterns of T-cell related transcriptional
expression
The heterogeneity of T-cell infiltration cannot be ignored; proper categorization
of CRCs by the magnitude of T-cell activity provides an appropriate scheme for
assessing secreted immune mediators [2,
4, 24]. The expression of genes involved in T-cell chemotaxis and
TH1 immunity were measured via real-time PCR to evaluate the
heterogeneity of anti-tumor immune activity across a population of CRCs.
Hierarchical clustering was used to bifurcate the population into unique groups.
Each tumor was identified as either ‘Hi’ (n=20) or
‘Lo’ (n=23) depending on the group they clustered with (Fig. 1A). Normal adjacent mucosae were included as
a comparison (Fig. 1B). The validity of the
bifurcation was confirmed by demonstrating higher expression of
CD8A in the Hi group (Fig. 1C) as well as 13 of the 15 (87%) genes listed in Fig. 1A and B (Supplemental Table 1).
This grouping was later used to predict which tumors were more infiltrated with
CD8+ T-cells and which were stronger secretors of T-cell
targeting chemokines.
Figure 1
Two major groups of CRCs are identified by transcriptional
expression
A, Using hierarchal clustering, 43 CRCs were classified into two groups
according to transcriptional profiles of genes involved in adaptive
immunity (TH1) and immune cell chemotaxis. This bifurcation
is depicted as a heat map and as a separation of CRCs into either higher
(Hi) (n=20) and lower (Lo) (n=23) expressing groups. B, Normal adjacent
mucosae (n=22) were included as a comparison, but were not included in
the hierarchal clustering. C, Expression of CD8A mRNA
between normal mucosae and the 2 CRC groups. All genes were normalized
to GAPDH and Student's t-test
was performed to determine significance. Error bars represent
+/− standard error of the mean (SEM) of grouped tissues.
**, P<0.01 and ***,
P<0.001.
Two major groups of CRCs are identified by transcriptional
expression
A, Using hierarchal clustering, 43 CRCs were classified into two groups
according to transcriptional profiles of genes involved in adaptive
immunity (TH1) and immune cell chemotaxis. This bifurcation
is depicted as a heat map and as a separation of CRCs into either higher
(Hi) (n=20) and lower (Lo) (n=23) expressing groups. B, Normal adjacent
mucosae (n=22) were included as a comparison, but were not included in
the hierarchal clustering. C, Expression of CD8A mRNA
between normal mucosae and the 2 CRC groups. All genes were normalized
to GAPDH and Student's t-test
was performed to determine significance. Error bars represent
+/− standard error of the mean (SEM) of grouped tissues.
**, P<0.01 and ***,
P<0.001.
T-cell related transcriptional expression predicts CRC progression
Escape from immune detection leads to tumor metastasis [25]. Therefore, type-1 T-cell activity in colorectal TMEs
is expected to decrease as tumors spread and metastasize. TNM stages 0, I, and
II are associated with a more favorable prognosis while stages III and IV
represent regional lymph node involvement and distant metastasis, respectively
[26]. One-way ANOVA test for trend
confirmed that TBX21 decreased with disease progression
(r = 0.286; P = 0.020) (Fig. 2A).
Figure 2
Type-1 T-cell activity decreases with advanced TNM stages
A, TBX21 mRNA expression was measured across normal
mucosae and TNM stages. Normal n=22, stage 0/I n=12, II n=15, III n=12,
and IV n=4. One-way ANOVA test for linear trend was performed. B,
Concentration of secreted IFN-γ was measured from recently
resected tissues minced into <1 mm3 pieces and placed
into culture media for 16 hours. Stage 0/I/II n=18 and stage III/IV
n=15. C, The chi-square test for linear trend was performed on CRC
groups among TNM stages, stage 0/I/III n=27, III n=12, and IV n=4.
Expression values of TBX21 were log2
transformed. Student's t-test was performed to
determine significance of TBX21 and IFN-γ. Error
bars represent +/− SEM of staged tissues. *,
P<0.05 and **,
P<0.01. P<0.05
significant for linear trend.
Type-1 T-cell activity decreases with advanced TNM stages
A, TBX21 mRNA expression was measured across normal
mucosae and TNM stages. Normal n=22, stage 0/I n=12, II n=15, III n=12,
and IV n=4. One-way ANOVA test for linear trend was performed. B,
Concentration of secreted IFN-γ was measured from recently
resected tissues minced into <1 mm3 pieces and placed
into culture media for 16 hours. Stage 0/I/II n=18 and stage III/IV
n=15. C, The chi-square test for linear trend was performed on CRC
groups among TNM stages, stage 0/I/III n=27, III n=12, and IV n=4.
Expression values of TBX21 were log2
transformed. Student's t-test was performed to
determine significance of TBX21 and IFN-γ. Error
bars represent +/− SEM of staged tissues. *,
P<0.05 and **,
P<0.01. P<0.05
significant for linear trend.These data impelled the study to examine the secretion of TH1
(IFN-γ) and, conversely, TH2-associated cytokines (IL-4, IL-5,
and IL-13) from live tissues. Normal mucosae and center portions of CRCs were
immediately collected after surgery, washed in DL-dithiothreitol (DTT) to remove
the mucus layer, minced into small pieces, and cultured in media for 16 hours.
Supernatants were then collected, cleared of debris, and analyzed for secreted
cytokines using the EMD Millipore's MILLIPLEX Human Cytokine/Chemokine
Luminex kit. Due to the small size of the study, data were consolidated by
non-metastatic or metastatic stages to reinforce findings. As expected,
IFN-γ was secreted more strongly from stage 0/I/II tumors when compare to
stage III/IV tumors (Fig. 2B). No
difference was detected for secreted IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (Supplemental Fig. 1), nor
for secreted IFN-γ or TBX21 expression across degree of
depth of invasion (T) (Supplemental Fig. 2). These data confirmed that type-1 T-cell
activity in TMEs of CRCs declined with either lymph node or distant organ
metastasis.The chi-square test for linear trend in proportions was used to determine whether
the proportion of either tumor group favored early or late TNM stages. This test
analyzes categorical data to determine whether an association exists between two
separate variables, one variable having two groups (Hi and Lo) and the other
having three (TNM stages 0/I/II, III, and IV). The Hi CRCs skewed towards
earlier TNM stages (0/I/II) while the Lo CRCs skewed towards later stages (III
and IV) (P<0.001) (Fig. 2C). These data demonstrate that the Hi group represents CRCs that
mainly lack invasion into lymph nodes or metastases to distant organs, while the
Lo group represents advanced stage tumors.
CRCs with decreased type-1 T-cell activity are proportionally skewed towards
distant organ metastasis
The evaluation of the anti-tumor immune responses within CRCs is important for
patient prognosis, therefore determining the association of type-1 T-cell
activity with clinical pathological characteristics was addressed [3, 8,
9, 27]. The small number of tumors collected from cohort of CRC
patients enrolled (IRB#011-030) lacked statistical power; therefore this study
included a second cohort (n=221) extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
The results shown are in whole or part based upon data generated by TCGA
Research Network [28]. The TCGA cohort
was distributed into contingency tables and analyzed using Fisher's exact
test to determine whether the Hi and Lo groups had a propensity to distribute by
certain clinicopathological characteristics. Fisher's exact test can be
employed to analyze categorical data when sample sizes are small. Here, one
variable was separated by type-1 T-cell activity (Hi and Lo), and the other
variables are listed in Table 1. Patients
were separated by the depth of invasion (T) of their tumors into T0/T1/T2 and
T3/T4 groups. No differences were determined between the mean ages of Hi and Lo
groups of patients (Table 1). The TCGA
cohort did not demonstrate a difference in proportion by gender, location of
primary tumor, depth of tumor invasion, or lymph node metastasis (N); however it
did demonstrate the Lo group to proportionally skew towards distant organ
metastasis (M) (P = 0.026). These data confirmed that
metastatic CRCs can be characterized by relative expression of immune related
genes.
Clinicopathological characteristics of the TCGA cohort and
discrimination of type-1 T-cell genes
Total
Hi
Lo
Test
Tumors (n)
221 (100%)
110 (100%)
111 (100%)
Age (y;X¯ ± SD)
69.42 ± 11.49
70.31 ± 10.97
68.53 ± 11.98
0.251
Gender
Male
116 (52%)
58 (53%)
58 (52%)
1.000
Female
105 (48%)
52 (47%)
53 (48%)
Primary tumor
Colon
156 (71%)
83 (75%)
73 (66%)
0.140
Rectum
65 (29%)
27 (25%)
38 (34%)
Depth of invasion
pT0/pT1/pT2
54 (24%)
25 (23%)
29 (26%)
0.639
pT3/pT4
167 (76%)
85 (77%)
82 (74%)
LN metastasis
N0
134 (61%)
69 (63%)
65 (59%)
0.583
N1-3
87 (39%)
41 (37%)
46 (41%)
Organ Metastasis
M0
185 (84%)
98 (89%)
87 (78%)
0.026
M1-2
35 (16%)
11 (10%)
24 (22%)
MX
1 (<1%)
1 (1%)
0 (0%)
P <0.05 in
bold
Tumors were distributed into contingency tables and analyzed using
Fisher's exact test to determine whether the Hi and Lo groups
distributed by certain clinicopathological characteristics.
P<0.05 is significant for linear trend. Abbreviations: T, depth
of invasion; N, lymph node metastasis; M, distant organ metastasis.
Tumors were distributed into contingency tables and analyzed using
Fisher's exact test to determine whether the Hi and Lo groups
distributed by certain clinicopathological characteristics.
P<0.05 is significant for linear trend. Abbreviations: T, depth
of invasion; N, lymph node metastasis; M, distant organ metastasis.
CRCs with increased type-1 T-cell activity are more highly infiltrated with
functionally active TH1 cells and CTLs
Flow cytometry was performed to determine the frequency of functionally active
CTLs and TH1 cells infiltrating colorectal tumors, and to further
validate the immunological characteristics both Hi and Lo groups. Total T-cells
were identified from the lymphocyte population as
CD45+CD3+, while functionally active
TH1 cells were identified as
CD4+CD8−IFN-γ+
and functionally active CTLs were identified as
CD4−CD8+GzmB+ and
CD4−CD8+ IFN-γ+
(Fig. 3A). Total T-cells,
IFN-γ+ TH1 cells,
GzmB+ CTLs, and IFN-γ+ CTLs were
increased in Hi CRCs when compared to Lo CRCs; however no difference was
detected between normal mucosae and the Lo CRCs for any T-cell subset (Fig.
3B). These data confirmed that CRCs
with increased expression of genes involved in T-cell chemotaxis and
TH1 immunity have a higher frequency of infiltrating and
functionally active tumor-targeting T-cells.
Figure 3
CRCs with high expression of type-1 T-cell genes have higher
frequency of infiltrating IFN-γ+ helper T-cells
and CTLs, and GzmB+ CTLs
A, Gating strategy used to identify T-cells subsets. Panel A represents
one stage I ‘Hi’ CRC and its matched normal mucosa. One
stage IV ‘Lo’ CRC is shown in Supplemental Fig.
3. Recently resected normal mucosa and tumor tissue specimens
were disaggregated into single cell suspensions, stimulated with PMA and
ionomycin, and then stained for seven-color flow cytometric analysis. B,
Average counts of total T-cells
(CD45+CD3+),
IFN-γ+ TH1 cells
(CD45+CD3+CD4+CD8−IFN-γ+),
IFN-γ+ CTLs
(CD45+CD3+CD4−CD8+IFN-γ+)
and GzmB+ CTLs
(CD45+CD3+CD4−CD8+GzmB+),
grouped into normal mucosae (n=14), Hi (n=5), and Lo (n=11) CRCs.
Student's t-test was performed using total
counts per 1000 live cells. Error bars represent +/− SEM
of grouped tissues. *, P<0.05 and **,
P<0.01.
CRCs with high expression of type-1 T-cell genes have higher
frequency of infiltrating IFN-γ+ helper T-cells
and CTLs, and GzmB+ CTLs
A, Gating strategy used to identify T-cells subsets. Panel A represents
one stage I ‘Hi’ CRC and its matched normal mucosa. One
stage IV ‘Lo’ CRC is shown in Supplemental Fig.
3. Recently resected normal mucosa and tumor tissue specimens
were disaggregated into single cell suspensions, stimulated with PMA and
ionomycin, and then stained for seven-color flow cytometric analysis. B,
Average counts of total T-cells
(CD45+CD3+),
IFN-γ+ TH1 cells
(CD45+CD3+CD4+CD8−IFN-γ+),
IFN-γ+ CTLs
(CD45+CD3+CD4−CD8+IFN-γ+)
and GzmB+ CTLs
(CD45+CD3+CD4−CD8+GzmB+),
grouped into normal mucosae (n=14), Hi (n=5), and Lo (n=11) CRCs.
Student's t-test was performed using total
counts per 1000 live cells. Error bars represent +/− SEM
of grouped tissues. *, P<0.05 and **,
P<0.01.
CXCL10 and CCL5 are strongly secreted from CRCs with increased type-1 T-cell
activity
To determine whether T-cell targeting chemokines are actively secreted from CRCs
with increased T-cell activity, supernatants from CRCs and normal mucosae were
again assayed using the EMD Millipore's MILLIPLEX Human
Cytokine/Chemokine Luminex kit [9]. Enough
tissue was collected to detect Chemokine concentrations within the optimal
ranges of the assay (data not shown); therefore stimulatory agents were not
used. Culturing was limited to 16 hours because longer incubations led to signal
degradation (data not shown). A fold change (FC) and P value
for each secreted chemokine was calculated by comparing the Hi and Lo groups to
normal mucosae. A FC of >2 and P value <0.05 were
set as the thresholds for strong secretion. CXCL1 was included as a control
because to our knowledge no study has indicated it as strongly expressed with
type-1 T-cell activity in CRCs. As expected, strong secretion of both CCL5 and
CXCL10 were detected from Hi CRCs when compared to normal mucosae (Fig. 4A). Secretion of both were not increased
from Lo CRCs, however CCL3 did meet the criteria as strongly secreted (Fig.
4B). Interestingly, secretion of CCL2,
CCL4, CX3CL1, and CCL11 were not increased in either group. A direct comparison
of CRC groups showed that CXCL10 and CCL5 secretion are increased in Hi CRCs
when compared to Lo CRCs, however CCL3 and CXCL1 were not significantly
increased in either group (Fig. 4C). These
data demonstrated that CXCL10 and CCL5 are more strongly secreted from CRCs with
comparatively stronger type-1 T-cell activity.
Figure 4
Type-1 T-cell attracting chemokines are strongly secreted from CRCs
with increased type-1 T-cell activity
A (Hi CRCs vs Normal) and B (Lo CRCs vs Normal), Multiplex Luminex
immunoassay of eight chemokines secreted from freshly resected CRCs and
normal mucosa. Dot plots of P values and fold changes
(FCs) between CRC groups and normal mucosa. Dashed lines are thresholds
for significant and strong secretion of chemokines
(P<0.05, and FC>2). Normal n=24, Hi CRCs
n=15, and Lo CRCs n=18. C, Comparison of secreted CXCL10, CCL5, CCL3,
and CXCL1 between Hi CRCs and Lo. D, Dot plots of chemokine
concentrations versus frequency of GzmB+ CTLs. Normal
n=15 and tumor n=16. Student's t-test was
performed using concentrations of chemokines. Error bars represent
+/− SEM of grouped tissues. *,
P<0.05. P<0.05 is
significant for linear trend.
Type-1 T-cell attracting chemokines are strongly secreted from CRCs
with increased type-1 T-cell activity
A (Hi CRCs vs Normal) and B (Lo CRCs vs Normal), Multiplex Luminex
immunoassay of eight chemokines secreted from freshly resected CRCs and
normal mucosa. Dot plots of P values and fold changes
(FCs) between CRC groups and normal mucosa. Dashed lines are thresholds
for significant and strong secretion of chemokines
(P<0.05, and FC>2). Normal n=24, Hi CRCs
n=15, and Lo CRCs n=18. C, Comparison of secreted CXCL10, CCL5, CCL3,
and CXCL1 between Hi CRCs and Lo. D, Dot plots of chemokine
concentrations versus frequency of GzmB+ CTLs. Normal
n=15 and tumor n=16. Student's t-test was
performed using concentrations of chemokines. Error bars represent
+/− SEM of grouped tissues. *,
P<0.05. P<0.05 is
significant for linear trend.Since CCL5 and CXCL10 secretion is enhanced in colorectal tumors with strong
type-1 T-cell activity, the frequency of T-cells should correlate with secretion
of both chemokines. CTL frequency in tumors and secreted chemokine
concentrations were measured earlier via flow cytometry and Luminex. CX3CL1 was
included as a negative control because its FC was approximately 1.0 with both
CRC groups when compared to normal mucosae. As expected, the frequency of
GzmB+ CTLs positively correlated with CXCL10 and CCL5 in
tumors (r = 0.938 and 0.838, respectively;
P<0.001 for both) but not with CX3CL1, and this pattern
was not observed among normal mucosae for any of the three chemokines (Fig.
4D). However,
IFN-γ+ TH1 cells did not appear to
follow the same pattern for any cytokine (Supplemental Fig. 4).
These data suggest that this novel method of immunoassaying determined that CCL5
and CXCL10 are strongly secreted from colorectal tumors with high infiltration
of cytotoxic lymphocytes and that these chemokines are biologically relevant in
colorectal tumors.
DISCUSSION
The prognostic relevance of T-cell biomarkers in humancancer has been the focus of
much debate. In general, type-1 T-cell activity is important for prolonged patient
survival [8, 27]. Chemokines and adhesion molecules function in biomolecular networks
to facilitate T-cell infiltration into sites of inflammation. However the specific
chemokines critical for T-cell infiltration into CRCs have not been fully
investigated. Our novel method for analyzing secreted immune mediators clarified
which biomarkers are critical and relevant for anti-tumor activity. This platform
allowed us to quantitate the dynamic range of immunological activity in CRCs beyond
transcriptional profiling and low dimensional IHC. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first study to demonstrate the enhanced secretion of CXCL10 and CCL5
from CRCs with strong type-1 T-cell activity. Our data showed that two of the
chemokines identified by Mlecnik and colleagues [9] as main contributors of CTL chemoattraction and indicators of
prolonged survival are strongly secreted from CRCs with increased type-1 T-cell
activity, confirming this observation in living clinical material. However, CCL2,
CCL11, and CX3CL1 were not strongly secreted from either CRC group. This could be
evidence that increased transcriptional expression of these chemokines is merely an
artifact of inflammation that is associated with the adaptive T-cell response. These
conclusions could only be derived by developing a novel method for measuring
secreted immune mediators from tumors.Our method was not limited to chemokine analysis. We show that the IFN-γ
secretion decreases in CRCs that either metastasized to lymph nodes or distant
organs. This indicates that the adaptive T-cell response is inhibited in the 2
metastatic behaviors seen in stages III and IV. These data are consistent with other
studies that suggest tumor-targeting T-cell activity is associated with prolonged
patient survival and the lack of metastatic disease [2-6, 8].Our data confirm that the bimodality of gene expression involving T-cell chemotaxis
and TH1 immunity are key prognostic features of CRC. CRCs with higher
expression of these genes were more infiltrated with IFN-γ+
TH1, IFN-γ+ CTLs, and
GzmB+ CTLs than low-expressing tumors, and were proportionally
skewed towards early TNM stages, which suggest that patients with these tumors will
survive longer. These observations reflect the major findings pertaining to T-cell
infiltration and CRC patient survival [2-8]. As expected, CXCL10 and CCL5 secretion were
positively correlated with the frequency of GzmB+ CTLs.
Interestingly, no correlation was detected between CXCL10 and CCL5 secretion and
IFN-γ+ TH1 cell frequency. This may be due
to the low number of IFN-γ+ cells detected via flow
cytometry, and that infiltrating TH1 cells play a minor role with
anti-tumor immunity when compared to CTLs.We recognize that our data do not determine whether anti-tumor T-cells during tumor
progression are decreasing in abundance, repolarizing to either TH2 or
TH17 cell responses, or both. Other studies suggest that strong
inflammatory TH17 cell activity drives tumorigenesis and angiogenesis and
interferes with type-1 T-cell activity [29,
30]. Our results can neither confirm nor
refute these studies. Therefore, the interplay between T-cell subsets and other
infiltrating immune cells needs to be further explored. We recognize that four stage
IV tumors are not enough to draw concrete conclusions; therefore we combined this
group with stage III tumors when analyzing immune activity in advanced stage
disease. Further analysis involving these stage IV tumors was limited to determining
trends within the whole tumor population collected. We recognize that heterogeneity
exists within each tissue collected; therefore we obtained samples from multiple
sites to represent each specimen as a whole and to mitigate the chance of randomly
selecting a unique compartment within each tissue that may be misrepresentative.
However we do not know whether the assembly of samples obtained truly represented
each specimen. That acknowledged, by culturing relatively large, minced tumor
specimens, we increased the possibility of more broadly sampling the TME than can be
achieved by tissue microarrays.Our study champions a growing movement within the gastrointestinal cancer research
community to incorporate an ‘immunoscore’ with current TNM staging
[27]. The originators of this novel
concept suggest that T-cell activity can be evaluated through IHC. Our study
supports this concept, and reinforces the efficacy of this practice by measuring
type-1 gene activity and chemokine secretion. This novel avenue for evaluating
immune activity in a tumor will also provide practitioners with better insights into
patients' odds for survival, which in turn may suggest which treatment
strategy, if any, will be most appropriate. By surveying secreted immune mediators
within the context of CRC, we underpin the basic perception of immune cell
infiltration into solid tumors. This method will open avenues for better
understanding disease progression and improve prognosis for many diseases.This novel method could also be a way of testing pharmacological interventions in
clinical specimens. Only a small group of CRC patients will derive a clinical
benefit from each individual treatment, while all patients are at risk for toxicity
when administered these drugs [31]. This has
initiated a growing argument that some chemotherapeutic agents may adversely affect
the immunological infiltrate in solid tumors. We can learn much more about the
efficacy of chemotherapeutic interventions by culturing tumors that are infiltrated
by immunosuppressive cells [32]. In mice,
5-flurouracil has been shown to inhibit myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)
allowing for an increase in T-cell activity [33]. Recently shown in a CRC mouse model, irinotecan increases
immunosuppression by inhibiting the effect 5-flurouracil has on MDSCs [34]. Therefore, the idea of evaluating the
effect of chemotherapies in our novel culturing method is intriguing, where it could
be extended to predicting which patients will respond to chemotherapies. Developing
new chemotherapeutic agents may not be the only specific way to benefit the patient
population. Additionally we need a better understanding of current therapies so that
patients may be treated more appropriately. Our novel method could be a tool for
testing the impact of therapeutic agents on the immunological milieu, and determine
which therapy is most likely to benefit the patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient enrollment
Forty-nine patients were enrollment after providing informed consent. A
HIPAA-approved record release authorization was obtained to grant access to each
patient's protected health information. All potential patients required
an initial diagnosis of any stage CRC prior to surgery. Forty-four separate
tumor specimens were obtained in conjunction with the Department of Pathology at
BUMC (Supplemental Table
2). This study received IRB approval, and includes protocol number,
IRB#011-030. Full TNM staging was performed by a trained pathologist. The gender
and age of each patient, as well of clinicopathological features, were recorded
for later analysis. The identity of each patient remained blinded from the
study's investigators. Due to the small size of the study, a larger
cohort of patients was obtained from TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) and utilized for validating
results pertaining to clinicopathological features when appropriate [28].
Tissue procurement
Tissues were excised from the patients and immediately delivered to the
Department of Pathology and thoroughly examined by trained staff pathologists.
0.5-1.0 grams (approximately dime-quarter size) of each specimen were obtained
by staff pathologists who were all instructed to collect multiple samples from
at least three cross-sections of each tumor and to avoid sampling from the tumor
surface and obvious areas of necrosis and ulceration. In total, approximately
4-6 samples were collected from each tissue. Masses initially diagnosed as
adenomatous polyps were not normally collected. Normal adjacent mucosa was
collected no more than 5 cm from the tumor site. Tissues were stored on ice or
at 4°C in a covered sterile Petri dish contained in a protective
secondary container, delivered to the GI Cancer Research Laboratory, and
processed no more than 30 minutes after the completion of surgery. At no time
were tissues frozen or placed in any fixative before analysis. Multiple portions
of each tissue were preserved in RNAlater®
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA) per manufacture's specifications and stored at
−80°C for later RNA extraction.
Ex-vivo tissue cultures and multiplex cytokine analysis (immunoassay)
Tissues extracted from the colon or rectum were removed from fatty tissues using
a sterile No. 11 surgical blade, and washed with 1.0 mM DTT (Sigma, St Louis,
MO) in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) without calcium, magnesium or
phenol red (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) for 15 minutes at 4°C on a
rotator plate to remove the mucous layer, and rinsed three more times with plain
ice cold HBSS to remove the DTT. To ensure that tissues had equal amounts of
surface area during ex-vivo culturing, precisely 0.20 grams of
CRCs and normal adjacent mucosae were minced (exactly 80 cuts) into smaller
pieces (<1mm3) using a sterile No. 11 surgical blade. Minced
tissue pieces were then fully submerged in 4 mL of Iscove's Modified
Dulbecco's Medium (IMDM) (Life Technologies) plus 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS) (Life Technologies), and 1X penicillin, streptomycin (Life Technologies),
1X gentamicin and amphotericin (Life Technologies) in vertically standing 25
cm2 tissue culture flasks, and incubated at 37°C in 5%
CO2. Supernatants were collected after 16 hours and stored at
−80°C, then thawed and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes to
clear away debris, and assayed for secreted CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL11,
CX3CL1, CXCL1, CXCL10, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 using the EMD
Millipore's MILLIPLEX MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine
Luminex kit system (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Data were analyzed using
Bio-Plex Manager 6.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Eleven tumors and 20 normal
mucosae samples were inadequate for immunoassay multiplexing.
Flow cytometric analysis of infiltrating T-cells
Approximately 0.5 grams of each excised tumor (n=16) and normal adjacent tissue
(n=15) were disaggregated into single-cell suspensions using 2.5 mg/mL
collagenase D (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 1 mg/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma), and 20
units/mL DNase I (Sigma) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies)
and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C with mild agitation and vortexing every
15 minutes. Suspensions were passed through 70 μM nylon cell strainers
(BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to remove aggregates. Cells were stimulated with
50 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and 1 μg/mL ionomycin and
treated with GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences) for 12 hours at 37°C in 5%
CO2. Cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD® Fixable
Aqua Dead Cell Stain (Life Technologies) and permeabilized using BD
Cytofix/CytopermTM Plus Fixation/Permeabilization Kit, then
stained for PE-CyTM7-CD45 (clone HI30), APC-CyTM7-CD3
(clone SK7), Pacific BlueTM-CD4 (clone RPA-T4),
PerCP-CyTM5.5-CD8 (clone RPA-T8), PE-IFN-γ (clone 4S.B3) (BD
Biosciences), and APC-Granzyme B (clone GB12) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Analysis was performed using a FACSCanto II cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data
were analyzed using FlowJo software. Between 10,000 and 50,000 live cells were
collected from each tissue. All antibodies were tested against isotype controls
(clone MOPC-21) (BD Biosciences). Markers were gated similarly between each
tumor and corresponding normal mucosa using the tumor's isotype control
stained lymphocyte population.
Real-time PCR analysis of immune biomarkers
RNA was extracted and genomic DNA was removed using RNeasy®
Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA was converted to cDNA using the Advantage RT-for-PCR
Kit (Clonetech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) following manufacture's
specifications. One tumor yielded inadequate RNA, and twenty-two normal mucosae
were not collected from surgically resected specimens. Gene expression was
analyzed using quantitative real-time QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen) and
the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA)
following manufacture's specifications. Primer sequences were obtained
from RTPrimerDB (http://www.rtprimerdb.org/index.php), the PrimerBank database
(http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/) and Quantitative PCR
Primer Database (QDDP) (http://www.rt-pcr.info/qppd-quantitative-pcr-primer-database/)
(Supplemental Table
3), and were evaluated in silico using the UCSC
Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) to
ensure that coding sequences straddled multiple exons and that binding sites
avoided single-nucleotide polymorphisms [35-38]. Primers were
purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA).
GAPDH was used as an internal normalizing control.
Statistical analysis
Graphpad Prism 6.0 software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA) was used to
generate all correlation coefficients (r) and
P values. Transcriptional data, cytokine secretion, T-cell
frequency, and all other data were analyzed using Student's
t-test. One-way ANOVA test or chi-square tests were used
when determining linear trends. Contingency tables were analyzed using
Fisher's exact test. The R software package “Hierarchical
Clustering” version 1.1.23-r7 (http://www.wessa.net/)
consisted of Ward's method [39].
Authors: W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler Journal: Genome Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Filip Pattyn; Piet Robbrecht; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman; Jo Vandesompele Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: R Bonecchi; G Bianchi; P P Bordignon; D D'Ambrosio; R Lang; A Borsatti; S Sozzani; P Allavena; P A Gray; A Mantovani; F Sinigaglia Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1998-01-05 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: K E Cole; C A Strick; T J Paradis; K T Ogborne; M Loetscher; R P Gladue; W Lin; J G Boyd; B Moser; D E Wood; B G Sahagan; K Neote Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1998-06-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Cornelis J M Melief; Thorbald van Hall; Ramon Arens; Ferry Ossendorp; Sjoerd H van der Burg Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Teilo H Schaller; Kristen A Batich; Carter M Suryadevara; Rupen Desai; John H Sampson Journal: Expert Rev Clin Immunol Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 5.124
Authors: Aria Sabbagh; Kevin Beccaria; Xiaoyang Ling; Anantha Marisetty; Martina Ott; Hillary Caruso; Emily Barton; Ling-Yuan Kong; Dexing Fang; Khatri Latha; Daniel Yang Zhang; Jun Wei; John DeGroot; Michael A Curran; Ganesh Rao; Jian Hu; Carole Desseaux; Guillaume Bouchoux; Michael Canney; Alexandre Carpentier; Amy B Heimberger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Carolyn J Loveridge; Ernest J Mui; Rachana Patel; Ee Hong Tan; Imran Ahmad; Michelle Welsh; Julie Galbraith; Ann Hedley; Colin Nixon; Karen Blyth; Owen Sansom; Hing Y Leung Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 12.701