| Literature DB >> 25671158 |
Maria Siglreitmeier1, Baohu Wu2, Tina Kollmann3, Martin Neubauer4, Gergely Nagy5, Dietmar Schwahn6, Vitaliy Pipich7, Damien Faivre8, Dirk Zahn3, Andreas Fery4, Helmut Cölfen1.
Abstract
A fabrication method of a multifunctional hybrid material is achieved by using the insoluble organic nacre matrix of theEntities:
Keywords: bio-inspired mineralization; biomineralization; chitin; ferrogel; hybrid materials; magnetite; nacre
Year: 2015 PMID: 25671158 PMCID: PMC4311584 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.6.13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1Magnetite formation inside a gelatin gel matrix (grey) that is placed inside the chitin scaffold of demineralized nacre (dark grey lines). Panel a) symbolizes the stage of mineralization after one reaction cycle, panel b) represents repeated mineralization cycles as demonstrated by the progress of mineralization shown by the increase of the magnetite nanoparticle number. At zero time, only the gel matrix is present.
Figure 2SANS macroscopic cross-section dΣ/dΩ versus scattering vector Q for a 1 mm thick piece of nacre in air and a demineralized nacre matrix in D2O (T = 20 °C). The neutron beam is parallel to the nacre/nacre organic matrix c-axis (perpendicular to the sample surface). At low Q (<0.02 nm−1) VSANS data are also presented after rescaling. The solid line represents a fit of the Beaucage equation [30] and correlation length model (Q > 0.03 nm−1) [31] (see Supporting Information File 1).
Figure 3Light microscopy image of thin cuts of embedded and Coomassie stained samples. a) Demineralized nacre matrix, b) confocal laser scanning microscopy of embedded demineralized nacre matrix stained with rhodamine B ITC, c) and d) demineralized nacre matrix (blue) with infiltrated gelatin (purple).
Figure 4SEM micrographs of a) and b) fracture surfaces of artificial nacre and c) fracture surface of original nacre Haliotis laevigata. d) EDX mapping analysis of artificial nacre fracture surface.
Figure 5TEM micrographs of a) artificial nacre after one reaction cycle and b) after four reaction cycles, c) reference chitin–magnetite composite sample without gelatin, and d) completely demineralized matrix.
Figure 6SANS and VSANS scattering patterns of magnetite in gelatin–chitin composite and of ferrogel in a mixed D2O/H2O solvent of 28 vol % D2O and 72 vol % H2O. The solid lines represent the fitting of the Beaucage expression [30].
Figure 7Magnetic properties of the synthesized hybrid materials. a) Magnetization curves of a representative dried sample at 2 K and 293 K. Inset: Enlargement of the low-field region showing the different coercive fields for the NPs at 2 and 293 K. Attraction of modified nacre with b) no magnetic field and c) external magnetic field (ca. 1 Tesla).
Figure 8Degree of sample swelling plotted as a function of the swelling time at 23 °C for different samples with a gelatin concentration of 10 wt %. The equilibrium swelling degrees Sd (%) for the plotted samples are 622.97 ± 88.31 (chitin–gelatin), 259.70 ± 38.46 (chitin demineralized) and 121.94 ± 5.13 (chitin–gelatin–magnetite RC 6).
Figure 9Representative structure of a triple helical (Gly–Hyp–Pro) peptide [44] of 100 Å length with two associated iron clusters. a) The ferric ion (light blue) is coordinated by seven oxygen atoms of which the three hydroxides show the strongest interaction and an Fe–O distance of 2.7 Å. The Fe–O distances to the solvent and to carbonyl/hydroxy groups of collagen were found to be about 3 Å. b) The ferrous ion (green) is also coordinated by seven oxygen atoms, but does not show a bipyramidal structure. More importantly, one of the hydroxide ions dissociated into the solvent. The Fe–O distances for iron–collagen and iron–water contacts were found to be about 3 Å, whilst the remaining hydroxide ion exhibits an Fe–O distance of 3.2 Å. Colors: Fe2+ (green), Fe3+ (light blue), O (red), H (white), N (dark blue), C (grey).
Figure 10Illustration of a β-chitin model [45] consisting of three poly-(1,4)-D-glucose chains of nine monomers stacked in three layers.
Figure 11a) Representative structure for the coordination of FeIII(OH)3 by chitin. The ferric ion (light blue) is coordinated by four different types of oxygen atoms (red) forming seven coordinative interactions. b) Coordination of FeII(OH)2 by chitin exhibiting a stable coordination by both hydroxide ions of the ion cluster. In summary, seven oxygen atoms coordinate the ferrous ion (green) building a pentagonal bipyramid, with the cluster hydroxide oxygens building the tops with a distance of 2.86 Å. The pentagonal plane consists of two oxygen atoms from solvent molecules forming weaker bonds of 3.1 Å and three protein contacts, whereby one carbonyl oxygen atom binds over 2.9 Å and two hydroxy oxygens over 3.1 Å.
Figure 12Force vs deformation characteristic of pure gelatin and gelatin with ferromagnetic particles. Introduction of nanoparticles leads to a significant increase of the stiffness of the material.
Figure 13Force vs deformation characteristics of the chitin scaffold and the final composite. Introduction of ferrogel leads to a detectable increase of the stiffness of the material.