| Literature DB >> 25671140 |
Giuseppe Leone1, Francesco Galeotti1, William Porzio1, Guido Scavia1, Luisa Barba2, Gianmichele Arrighetti2, Giovanni Ricci1, Chiara Botta1, Umberto Giovanella1.
Abstract
We report on the intercalation of a cationic fluorescent oligo(fluorene) in between the 2D interlayer region of a fluoromica type silicate. The formation of intercalated structures with different fluorophore contents is observed in powders by synchrotron radiation XRD. Successively, the hybrids are dispersed in poly(styrene) through in situ polymerization. Such a procedure allows us to synthesize the materials from solution, to achieve solid films, and to characterize them by optical and morphologic techniques. The polymeric films with homogeneous distribution of the hybrids exhibit ultraviolet-blue photoluminescence with a significantly enhanced photostability compared to the bare oligo(fluorene)s. Finally, under specific conditions, the polymer hybrid with higher oligo(fluorene) content spontaneously assembles into highly ordered microporous films.Entities:
Keywords: breath figures; fluoromica; layered silicates; oligo(fluorene); photostability; self-assembly
Year: 2014 PMID: 25671140 PMCID: PMC4311581 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.5.254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1Chemical structure of the cationic oligo(fluorene) (TF).
Cation-exchange reaction conditions, and XRD results.
| sample | cation exchange | XRD data | |||
| (% vs CEC) | 2θ (°) | ||||
| SMEe | 7.26/9.36 | 1.22/0.95 | 50/45 | ||
| DHSe | 9.40/9.20 | 0.94 | |||
| T5 | 5 | 5.88/7.1 | 1.51 | 0.55 | 10 |
| T15 | 15 | 2.65/5.85e | 3.3/1.51 | 2.34/0.55 | 13/30 |
| T30 | 30 | 2.87/5.75/8.5f | 3.15 | 2.18 | 13 |
aThe XRD data for SME and DHS, reported in [9], are added to help the comparison with the TF-intercalated samples. Peaks other than those indicated observed in the patterns are possibly attributable to a mixed reflection of fluoromica [20].
bThe basal spacing, d(001), is determined by Bragg’s equation 2d(hkl) sin θ = λ.
cThe lamellae clearance (d-free) is determined by subtracting the thickness of the SME layer (0.94 nm) from the basal spacing determined from the (001) diffraction peak.
dL is the crystallite size determined by using the package described in [21];
eTwo spacings related to different arrangements are observed.
fThree orders of [00l] are detected.
Figure 2XRD spectra of SME, dehydrated SME (DHS), TF-intercalated hybrids (T5, T15, and T30), and the PS/TF–intercalated SME materials (PT5, PT15 and PT30).
Figure 3The fluorescence spectra of PT5 (a), PT15 (b), PT30 (c) and TF films (d).
Figure 4Fluorescence microscopy image, corresponding AFM magnification X,Y = 20 µm (inset) and cluster profile of PT5 (a) PT15 (b) and PT30 (c) films. d) AFM detail of a typical cluster.
Figure 5(a–c) Microscopy images of films of PT5, PT15 and PT30 cast under breath figure conditions. (d–f) Fluorescence microscopy images of PT5, PT15 and PT30 films prepared under the same conditions, after the addition of free TF (0.4% w/w). (g) Highly ordered microporous film of PT30 after optimization of parameters. (h) AFM view of a 10 × 10 µm2 area of the same film. All scale bars are 20 µm long.
Figure 6Chromatic stability of steady-state PL spectra upon UV exposure for 0 (dark blue line) to 20 min (red line) of neat flat TF film (a) and PT15 film (b). PL intensity of 400 nm peak of TF and PT15 film versus exposure time to UV light (c). PL images of the patterned PT15 film acquired during exposure to UV light are reported in (d–f).