F Ramón de Fata1, K Hauner2, G Andrés1, J C Angulo3, M Straub2. 1. Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España. 2. Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Múnich, Alemania. 3. Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España. Electronic address: jangulo@futurnet.es.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are consolidated procedures for the treatment of kidney stones; however, their primary weak points are the lower efficacy of ESWL, especially for lower calyx stones, and the morbidity of PCNL resulting from the creation and dilation of the percutaneous trajectory. The increasing miniaturization of percutaneous surgery instrumentation and the development of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are recent innovations. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: A structured nonsystematic review was conducted through a literature search of articles published between 1997 and 2013, using the terms kidney stones, miniperc, mini-PCNL, RIRS and flexible ureteroscopy in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: RIRS requires greater surgical time, several procedures for voluminous stones and higher hospital costs, due in part to the relative fragility of the instruments. On the other hand, miniperc requires a longer hospital stay, an increased need for postoperative analgesia and a greater reduction in hemoglobin levels, although these do not translate into an increased rate of transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: The current treatment of kidney stones uses minimally invasive procedures such as miniperc and RIRS. The 2 procedures are equivalent in terms of efficacy (stone clearance) and are associated with minimal complications. Comparative prospective studies are necessary to determine the position of each of these techniques in the treatment of kidney stones. In our experience, the 2 techniques are complementary and should be part of the current urological therapeutic arsenal.
CONTEXT: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are consolidated procedures for the treatment of kidney stones; however, their primary weak points are the lower efficacy of ESWL, especially for lower calyx stones, and the morbidity of PCNL resulting from the creation and dilation of the percutaneous trajectory. The increasing miniaturization of percutaneous surgery instrumentation and the development of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are recent innovations. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: A structured nonsystematic review was conducted through a literature search of articles published between 1997 and 2013, using the terms kidney stones, miniperc, mini-PCNL, RIRS and flexible ureteroscopy in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: RIRS requires greater surgical time, several procedures for voluminous stones and higher hospital costs, due in part to the relative fragility of the instruments. On the other hand, miniperc requires a longer hospital stay, an increased need for postoperative analgesia and a greater reduction in hemoglobin levels, although these do not translate into an increased rate of transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: The current treatment of kidney stones uses minimally invasive procedures such as miniperc and RIRS. The 2 procedures are equivalent in terms of efficacy (stone clearance) and are associated with minimal complications. Comparative prospective studies are necessary to determine the position of each of these techniques in the treatment of kidney stones. In our experience, the 2 techniques are complementary and should be part of the current urological therapeutic arsenal.