Literature DB >> 25669921

Use of Automated Bone Age for Critical Growth Assessment.

Khalid M Khan1, Maria T Gonzalez-Bolanos2, Tara Holm2, Bradley S Miller2, Kyriakie Sarafoglou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the variability of bone age (BA) rating between clinicians and an automated system in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).
METHOD: A total of 126 radiographs assessed by 3 clinicians blinded to patient details using Greulich and Pyle (GP) (readers 1, 2, and 3) and BoneXpert (BX).
RESULTS: Comparing BA rating with each other, the mean of the absolute differences varied from 0.42 ± 0.53 years (reader 1 and BX) to 0.57 ± 0.58 years (reader 2 and reader 3), P = .368. Comparing ratings that were consistent with all 4 methods (within 1 year of each other, 93/126, 74%) and the remaining, "outliers" (33/126, 26%), the outliers were younger (P = .003), smaller (height, P = .011, weight, P = .000), and prepubertal (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: The variability of BA rating in CAH children is similar whether performed by clinicians or an automated system. The greatest variability was in prepubertal children.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Greulich and Pyle; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; growth; prepubertal; puberty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25669921     DOI: 10.1177/0009922815572076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  1 in total

1.  A simple method for bone age assessment: the capitohamate planimetry.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Young Chul Kim; Seon Jeong Min; Eun Kyung Khil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.