Literature DB >> 25668715

Review of current therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts.

L Guenther1, P D Hardt2, P Collet3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic interventions for complicated pancreatitis, especially in pseudocysts and walled-off necroses as a sequel of necrotizing pancreatitis, have a long history. Originally a stronghold of classical surgery and radiology, in the last two decades this was increasingly supplemented by endoscopy, often with adjuvant percutaneous drainage, mostly reducing open surgery to a salvage intervention in case of failure and complication. This study aims to evaluate and compare the current therapeutic options for pancreatic fluid collections, especially pseudocysts.
METHODS: Systematic literature search via MedLine and Pubmed was performed with comprehensive tabulations of original publications of the endoscopic, surgical and percutaneous therapeutic interventions in pancreatic pseudocysts and WON in the last 27 years. Only studies including more than 10 cases were further analysed. The results with regard to complications, outcome, recurrence and mortality were analysed for each approach, the risk of bias was assessed and a conclusive statement was made.
RESULTS: The initial literature search identified 46 studies. 12 studies had to be excluded because the number of individuals included was too low. 34 endoscopic, 8 surgical and 8 percutaneous studies were further analysed, leading to a number of 2485 patients in this review. The short-term clinical success was 85 % for the endoscopic approach, 83 % for surgery and 67 % for the percutaneous intervention. The complication rates were 16 %, 45 % and 34 % for endoscopic, surgical and percutaneous therapy, respectively. Typical complications were hemorrhage, infection, perforation and, especially in the percutaneous approach, pancreatocutaneous fistulisation.
CONCLUSION: According to the high success and low complication rates the endoscopic intervention appears as the most efficient method. But each method has its own indications, restrictions and therefore patient groups. Therefore it is reasonable to consider all the available methods in a productive interdisciplinary manner for the ultimate benefit of the patient in the future. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25668715     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  3 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections-revisited.

Authors:  Zaheer Nabi; Jahangeer Basha; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage caused by pancreatic pseudocyst complicated with Dieulafoy's disease in a child: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lintao Liu; Lichao Zhang; Xiaoli Zhu; Meng Li; Juan Cao; Likang Ji; Xiaoyang Qi; Weili Xu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Management of patients after recovering from acute severe biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Georgia Dedemadi; Manolis Nikolopoulos; Ioannis Kalaitzopoulos; George Sgourakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.