Literature DB >> 25668497

An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures.

Michele Ann Manahan1, Kate J Buretta, David Chang, Suhail K Mithani, Jesse Mallalieu, Michele A Shermak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reduction alleviates macromastia symptoms and facilitates symmetrical breast reconstruction after cancer treatment. We investigated a large series of consecutive breast reductions to study important factors that impact outcomes.
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of all breast reductions from 1999 to 2009 in a single institution was performed using the medical record for demographics, medical history, physical examination, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications. Multivariate statistical analysis was performed using Stata 1.0. P ≤ 0.05 defined significance.
RESULTS: Seventeen surgeons performed 2152 consecutive breast reductions on 1148 patients using inferior pedicle/Wise pattern (56.4%), medial pedicle/Wise pattern (16.8%), superior pedicle/nipple graft/Wise pattern (15.1%), superior pedicle/vertical pattern (11.6%), and liposuction (0.1%) techniques. Complications included discernible scars (14.5%), nonsurgical wounds (13.5%), fat necrosis (8.2%), infection (7.3%), wounds requiring negative pressure wound therapy or reoperation (1.4%), and seroma (1.2%). Reoperation rates were 6.7% for scars, 1.4% for fat necrosis, and 1% for wounds.Body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m increased risk of infections [odds ratio (OR), 2.3, P = 0.000], seromas (OR, 2.9, P = 0.03), fat necrosis (OR, 2.0, P = 0.002), and minor wounds (OR, 1.7, P = 0.001). Cardiac disease increased reoperation for scar (OR, 3.0, P = 0.04) and fat necrosis (OR, 5.3, P = 0.03). Tobacco use increased infection rate (OR, 2.1, P = 0.008). Secondary surgery increased seromas (OR, 12.0, P = 0.001). Previous hysterectomy/oophorectomy increased risk of wound reoperations (OR, 3.4, P = 0.02), and exogenous hormone supplementation trended toward decreasing infections (OR, 0.5, P = 0.08). χ analysis revealed 7.8% infection risk without exogenous hormone versus 3.8% risk with hormone supplementation (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity, tobacco, cardiac history, and secondary surgery negatively impacted breast reduction outcomes. Hormonal status impacted reoperations and infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25668497     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829d2261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

Review 1.  A pictorial review: multimodality imaging of benign and suspicious features of fat necrosis in the breast.

Authors:  Sidra J Tayyab; Beatriz E Adrada; Gaiane Margishvili Rauch; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Nationally Validated Scoring System to Predict Unplanned Reoperation and Readmission after Breast Reduction.

Authors:  Theresa K Webster; Pablo A Baltodano; Xiaoning Lu; Huaqing Zhao; Nicholas Elmer; Karen E Massada; Juliet Panichella; Rohan Brebion; Sthefano Araya; Sameer A Patel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Twenty Years of Breast Reduction Surgery at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Loretta Coady-Fariborzian; Christy Anstead
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-07

4.  A Simplified Approach to Breast Reduction Using the Medial Pedicle.

Authors:  Sarah C Hunt; Yue Sun; Sanjay Azad
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Fat necrosis and polymicrobial wound infection caused partly by Raoultella ornithinolytica after reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Folusakin Ayoade; Pradeep Kumar Mada; Mohammad Alam
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Clinical Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Sponge with Zinc versus Placebo for Scar Reduction after Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Monali Mahedia; Nilay Shah; Bardia Amirlak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.