Literature DB >> 25668400

Associations of Low- and High-Intensity Light Activity with Cardiometabolic Biomarkers.

Bethany Howard1, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Parneet Sethi, Valerie Carson, Nicola D Ridgers, J O Salmon, Genevieve N Healy, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) accounts for much of adults' waking hours (≈40%) and substantially contributes to overall daily energy expenditure. Encompassing activity behaviors of low intensity (standing with little movement) to those of higher intensity (slow walking), LIPA is ubiquitous, yet little is known about how associations with health may vary depending on its intensity. We examined the associations of objectively assessed LIPA (categorized as either low LIPA [LLPA] or high LIPA [HLPA]) and moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity with cardiometabolic risk biomarkers.
METHODS: Cardiometabolic biomarkers were measured in 4614 US adults (47 ± 17 yr) who participated in the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the associations of three accelerometer-derived physical activity (SD increment per day) intensity categories (LLPA, 100-761 counts per minute; HLPA, 762-1951 counts per minute; moderate-intensity physical activity [MPA], 1952-5724 counts per minute; vigorous-intensity physical activity [VPA], ≥5725 counts per minute) with cardiometabolic biomarkers, adjusting for potential sociodemographic, behavioral, and medical confounders.
RESULTS: All intensities of physical activity were beneficially associated with waist circumference, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, fasting insulin, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity (P < 0.05); only some activity intensities showed significant associations with systolic blood pressure (LLPA), body mass index, HDL cholesterol, fasting glucose, and 2-h plasma glucose (HLPA, MPA, and VPA). Generally, effect size increased with intensity of physical activity. Overall, further adjustment for waist circumference attenuated associations with MPA and VPA to a greater extent than associations with LLPA and HLPA.
CONCLUSIONS: The cross-sectional findings provide novel evidence for the potential benefits of increasing both LLPA and HLPA. They further reinforce the established importance of moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity, the mainstay of public health recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25668400     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  23 in total

Review 1.  Health Benefits of Light-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Eszter Füzéki; Tobias Engeroff; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Use of Compositional Data Analysis to Show Estimated Changes in Cardiometabolic Health by Reallocating Time to Light-Intensity Physical Activity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Cormac Powell; Leonard D Browne; Brian P Carson; Kieran P Dowd; Ivan J Perry; Patricia M Kearney; Janas M Harrington; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Association between Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Mortality in NHANES.

Authors:  Ezra I Fishman; Jeremy A Steeves; Vadim Zipunnikov; Annemarie Koster; David Berrigan; Tamara A Harris; Rachel Murphy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Regional Comparisons of Associations Between Physical Activity Levels and Cardiovascular Disease: The Story of Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Bartosz Orzel; Melanie Keats; Yunsong Cui; Scott Grandy
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-01-21

5.  In-school versus out-of-school sedentary behavior patterns in U.S. children.

Authors:  Jimikaye Beck; Christine A Chard; Carolin Hilzendegen; James Hill; Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Associations of mutually exclusive categories of physical activity and sedentary time with markers of cardiometabolic health in English adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Health Survey for England.

Authors:  Kishan Bakrania; Charlotte L Edwardson; Danielle H Bodicoat; Dale W Esliger; Jason M R Gill; Aadil Kazi; Latha Velayudhan; Alan J Sinclair; Naveed Sattar; Stuart J H Biddle; Kamlesh Khunti; Melanie Davies; Thomas Yates
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Both Light Intensity and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity Measured by Accelerometry Are Favorably Associated With Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Older Women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) Study.

Authors:  Michael J LaMonte; Cora E Lewis; David M Buchner; Kelly R Evenson; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; John Bellettiere; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles B Eaton; Barbara V Howard; Chloe Bird; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Light and sporadic physical activity overlooked by current guidelines makes older women more active than older men.

Authors:  Shiho Amagasa; Noritoshi Fukushima; Hiroyuki Kikuchi; Tomoko Takamiya; Koichiro Oka; Shigeru Inoue
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Associations of low-intensity light physical activity with physical performance in community-dwelling elderly Japanese: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro P Izawa; Ai Shibata; Kaori Ishii; Rina Miyawaki; Koichiro Oka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Systematic review of the relationships between physical activity and health indicators in the early years (0-4 years).

Authors:  Valerie Carson; Eun-Young Lee; Lyndel Hewitt; Cally Jennings; Stephen Hunter; Nicholas Kuzik; Jodie A Stearns; Stephanie Powley Unrau; Veronica J Poitras; Casey Gray; Kristi B Adamo; Ian Janssen; Anthony D Okely; John C Spence; Brian W Timmons; Margaret Sampson; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.