Literature DB >> 2566824

Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.

H Peltola1, M Anttila, O V Renkonen.   

Abstract

In a multicentre study, 220 consecutive cases of bacterial meningitis in children older than 3 months were randomised to treatment with chloramphenicol, ampicillin (initially with chloramphenicol), cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone. The drugs were given in four equal daily doses for 7 days, except ceftriaxone which was given only once daily. 200 cases could be assessed; the causative organisms were Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) in 146; meningococci (Mnc) in 32; pneumococci (Pnc) in 13; and other or unknown in 9. In patients with Hib meningitis, sterilisation of the cerebrospinal fluid occurred most rapidly with ceftriaxone. Otherwise, in terms of overall clinical recovery, normalisation of laboratory indices, clinically significant adverse reactions, toxic effects, sequelae, and mortality rate, the treatment groups were very similar. However, there were 4 bacteriological failures, all in the chloramphenicol group. Also, the treatment was extended or changed in more cases in the chloramphenicol group than in the other groups. Chloramphenicol was thus inferior to the other three antimicrobials. Ampicillin is a good and cheap alternative, but there are difficulties with resistance. Easy administration tempts the use of ceftriaxone rather than cefotaxime but it causes diarrhoea. A 7-day course of ampicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone is sufficient in Hib, Mnc, or Pnc meningitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2566824     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  35 in total

Review 1.  Recognition, treatment and complications of meningococcal disease.

Authors:  F A Riordan; A P Thomson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Hearing impairment after bacterial meningitis: a review.

Authors:  H M Fortnum
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Antibiotic choices for meningitis beyond the neonatal period.

Authors:  N J Klein; R S Heyderman; M Levin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime in the presence of serum albumin.

Authors:  S K Nath; G A Foster; L A Mandell; C Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-01

Review 5.  Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K Prasad; A Kumar; P K Gupta; T Singhal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 6.  Neurology.

Authors:  A N Gale; J M Gibbs; A H Schapira; P K Thomas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  In vitro antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacterial isolates from cases of acute bacterial meningitis with special reference to ceftriaxone.

Authors:  B N Rao; I M Kashbur; N M Shembesh; S M el Bargathy
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Bacterial meningitis: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management update.

Authors:  Yuliya Nudelman; Allan R Tunkel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Passage of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone into cerebrospinal fluid of patients with uninflamed meninges.

Authors:  R Nau; H W Prange; P Muth; G Mahr; S Menck; H Kolenda; F Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy.

Authors:  R de Groot; G Dzoljic-Danilovic; B van Klingeren; W H Goessens; H J Neyens
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.