Literature DB >> 25668057

Postactivation potentiation during voluntary contractions after continued knee extensor task-specific practice.

Laurent B Seitz1, Gabriel S Trajano, Fabien Dal Maso, G Gregory Haff, Anthony J Blazevich.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine whether performing dynamic conditioning activities (CAs) contributes to postactivation potentiation (PAP); to examine the potential confounding effects of CAs with different velocity, total contraction duration, and total work characteristics; and to gain a greater understanding of potential peripheral and central mechanisms underlying PAP. Voluntary (isokinetic knee extensions at 180°·s(-1)) and electrically evoked torques and electromyogram (EMG) data were captured before and 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 min after 5 different dynamic CAs (4 knee extensions at 60°·s(-1), 4 and 12 at 180°·s(-1), and 4 and 20 at 300°·s(-1)), after the participants had completed a full warm-up including extensive task-specific practice to the point where maximal voluntary contractile capacity was achieved. Even after maximal voluntary contractile capacity had been achieved, the imposition of CAs of longer total contraction duration (6 s) and a minimum total work of ∼750-900 J elicited significant increases in both voluntary (for 7 min; up to 5.9%) and twitch (for 4 min; up to 13.5%) torques (i.e., PAP), regardless of the velocity of the CA. No changes in EMG:M-wave were detected after any CA. A dynamic voluntary CA can contribute to improved voluntary and electrically evoked torques even when maximal voluntary contractile capacity has previously been achieved. Furthermore, a minimum CA contraction duration and minimum total work appear important to increase torque production, although movement velocity appears unimportant. Changes in peripheral function but not central drive may have contributed to the observed PAP under the present conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditioning activity; electrical stimulation; extension du genou; knee extension; moment de force; stimulation électrique; stimulus conditionnant; torque; velocity; vitesse

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25668057     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  5 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans.

Authors:  Alexander M Zero; Charles L Rice
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Perspective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Time to Differentiate Postactivation "Potentiation" from "Performance Enhancement" in the Strength and Conditioning Community.

Authors:  Olaf Prieske; Martin Behrens; Helmi Chaabene; Urs Granacher; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Postactivation Performance Enhancement (PAPE) Increases Vertical Jump in Elite Female Volleyball Players.

Authors:  Lamberto Villalon-Gasch; Alfonso Penichet-Tomas; Sergio Sebastia-Amat; Basilio Pueo; Jose M Jimenez-Olmedo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Muscle Strength and Optimal Individual Post-Activation Potentiation Time of the Upper Body in Canoeists.

Authors:  Chia-Chi Wang; Shu-Cheng Lin; Shu-Ching Hsu; Ming-Ta Yang; Kuei-Hui Chan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.