Mustafa Emiroğlu1, İsmail Sert2, Abdullah İnal3, Cem Karaali1, Kemal Peker3, Enver İlhan4, Mehmet Gülcelik5, Varlık Erol1, Hilmi Güngör4, Didem Can6, Cengiz Aydın1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey. 2. Department of General Surgery, Van Regional Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey. 3. Department of General Surgery, Erzincan University, Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey. 4. Department of General Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey. 5. Department of General Surgery, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 6. Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic Breast Surgery (OBS), which is a combination of oncological procedures and plastic surgery techniques, has recently gained widespread use. AIMS: To assess the experiences, practice patterns and preferred approaches to Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery (ORBS) undertaken by general surgeons specializing in breast surgery in Turkey. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Between December 2013 and February 2014, an eleven-question survey was distributed among 208 general surgeons specializing in breast surgery. The questions focused on the attitudes of general surgeons toward performing oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), the role of the general surgeon in OBS and their training for it as well as their approaches to evaluating cosmetic outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and informing patients about ORBS preoperatively. RESULTS: Responses from all 208 surgeons indicated that 79.8% evaluated the cosmetic outcomes of BCS, while 94.2% informed their patients preoperatively about ORBS. 52.5% performed BCS (31.3% themselves, 21.1% together with a plastic surgeon). 53.8% emphasized that general surgeons should carry out OBS themselves. 36.1% of respondents suggested that OBS training should be included within mainstream surgical training, whereas 27.4% believed this training should be conducted by specialised centres. CONCLUSION: Although OBS procedure rates are low in Turkey, it is encouraging to see general surgeons practicing ORBS themselves. The survey demonstrates that our general surgeons aspire to learn and utilize OBS techniques.
BACKGROUND:Oncoplastic Breast Surgery (OBS), which is a combination of oncological procedures and plastic surgery techniques, has recently gained widespread use. AIMS: To assess the experiences, practice patterns and preferred approaches to Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery (ORBS) undertaken by general surgeons specializing in breast surgery in Turkey. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Between December 2013 and February 2014, an eleven-question survey was distributed among 208 general surgeons specializing in breast surgery. The questions focused on the attitudes of general surgeons toward performing oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), the role of the general surgeon in OBS and their training for it as well as their approaches to evaluating cosmetic outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and informing patients about ORBS preoperatively. RESULTS: Responses from all 208 surgeons indicated that 79.8% evaluated the cosmetic outcomes of BCS, while 94.2% informed their patients preoperatively about ORBS. 52.5% performed BCS (31.3% themselves, 21.1% together with a plastic surgeon). 53.8% emphasized that general surgeons should carry out OBS themselves. 36.1% of respondents suggested that OBS training should be included within mainstream surgical training, whereas 27.4% believed this training should be conducted by specialised centres. CONCLUSION: Although OBS procedure rates are low in Turkey, it is encouraging to see general surgeons practicing ORBS themselves. The survey demonstrates that our general surgeons aspire to learn and utilize OBS techniques.
Entities:
Keywords:
General surgeon; oncoplastic breast surgery; survey
Authors: Maria João Cardoso; Jaime Santos Cardoso; Conny Vrieling; Douglas Macmillan; Dick Rainsbury; Joerg Heil; Eric Hau; Mohammed Keshtgar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Maria João Cardoso; R Douglas Macmillan; Belén Merck; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Richard Rainsbury Journal: Breast Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Mustafa Emiroğlu; Abdullah Inal; İsmail Sert; Enver İlhan; Kemal Peker; Mehmet Ali Gulcelik; Mehmet Ali Gürçelik; Hilmi Güngör; Semra Salimoğlu; Didem Can; Hülya Ellidokuz; Cengiz Aydın Journal: Breast Cancer Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.239
Authors: Peter L Malycha; Ian R Gough; Marko Margaritoni; S V S Deo; Kerstin Sandelin; Ines Buccimazza; Gaurav Agarwal Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Benjamin O Anderson; Susan Braun; Robert W Carlson; Julie R Gralow; Micheal D Lagios; Constance Lehman; Gilberto Schwartsmann; Hernan I Vargas Journal: Breast J Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Amie M Scott; Jennifer A Klok; Peter G Cordeiro; Stefan J Cano Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: B Fisher; C Redmond; E R Fisher; M Bauer; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; E Montague; R Margolese; R Foster Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245