| Literature DB >> 25667706 |
Lawrence Mbuagbaw1, Amy Slogrove2, Jacqueline Sas3, John Kunda4, Frederick Morfaw5, Jackson Mukonzo6, Lehana Thabane7.
Abstract
The CIHR canadian HIV trials network mandate includes strengthening capacity to conduct and apply clinical research through training and mentoring initiatives of HIV researchers by building strong networks and partnerships on the African continent. At the17th International Conference on AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Africa (ICASA), the CTN facilitated a two-day workshop to address ethical issues in the conduct of HIV research, and career enhancing strategies for young African HIV researchers. Conference attendees were allowed to attend whichever session was of interest to them. We report on the topics covered, readings shared and participants' evaluation of the workshop. The scientific aspects of ethical research in HIV and career enhancement strategies are relevant issues to conference attendees.Entities:
Keywords: Capacity building; HIV research; South Africa; ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25667706 PMCID: PMC4315477 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.44.4766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Workshop outline and resources
| Objective | Topics covered | Readings and Internet resources |
|---|---|---|
| Understand the role of the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network in ethical HIV research |
| CTN Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards Program fellowships: |
| Understand the role of scientific validity in ethical research |
| [ |
| Understand the importance of capacity building for ethical conduct of research |
| [ |
| List ways in which they can enhance their research careers |
| [ |
| Describe community involvement in ethical HIV research |
| [ |
Median ratings (1 = poor; 7= excellent) for evaluation of workshop sessions
| Session | Item | n | Median( Q1,Q2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Clarity of the objectives | 38 | 6.0 (4.0, 6.0) |
| Appropriateness of the objectives | 34 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Clarity of the presentation | 36 | 6.0 (4.0, 6.0) | ||
| Usefulness of the materials | 34 | 6.0 (4.7, 6.3) | ||
| Overall clarity of presentation | 35 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
|
| Clarity of the objectives | 34 | 6.0 (4.8, 7.0) | |
| Appropriateness of the objectives | 33 | 6.0 (4.0, 6.0) | ||
| Clarity of the presentation | 33 | 6.0 (4.5, 7.0) | ||
| Usefulness of the materials | 32 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Overall clarity of presentation | 32 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
|
| Clarity of the objectives | 33 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | |
| Appropriateness of the objectives | 32 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Clarity of the presentation | 30 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.3) | ||
| Usefulness of the materials | 30 | 6.0 (4.0, 6.0) | ||
| Overall clarity of presentation | 30 | 6.0 (5.0, 7.0) | ||
|
|
| Clarity of the objectives | 20 | 5.0 (4.3, 6.0) |
| Appropriateness of the objectives | 20 | 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Clarity of the presentation | 20 | 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Usefulness of the materials | 20 | 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Overall clarity of presentation | 18 | 5.5 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
|
| Clarity of the objectives | 17 | 5.0 (4.0,6.0) | |
| Appropriateness of the objectives | 18 | 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Clarity of the presentation | 18 | 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Usefulness of the materials | 18 | 5.0 (5.0, 6.0) | ||
| Overall clarity of presentation | 18 | 5.0 (4.0,6.0) |