Literature DB >> 25667064

Should routine radiological assessment of anastomotic integrity be performed after oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET).

Christopher M Jones1, Rebecca Heah2, Brigette Clarke3, Ewen A Griffiths4.   

Abstract

Rates of anastomotic leak in patients who undergo oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis formation are reported within the literature to surpass those of patients undergoing thoracic anastomosis formation. Though preferred by a number of surgeons, cervical anastomosis is associated with higher rates of anastomotic leak, the consequences of which can be severe. Routine contrast oesophagograms are therefore utilised in a number of institutions as a means of recognising leaks early. They are not without potential complications, however, and the predictive value of contrast imaging has previously been debated. This best evidence topic reviews the use of contrast oesophagograms in screening for cervical anastamotic leak, concluding that their inherent risk of aspiration combined with poor sensitivity should preclude their use as a screening tool. High rates of specificity nevertheless indicate the potential utility of these studies in patients for whom there is clinical suspicion of a leak.
Copyright © 2015 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Contrast; Imaging; Leaks; Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagus; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25667064     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of Routine Esophagram for Detecting Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kelly R Haisley; Missy L DeSouza; Elizabeth N Dewey; Sabrina E Drexel; Yalini Vigneswaran; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhongwu Hu; Xiaowe Wang; Xush An; Wenjin Li; Yun Feng; Zhenbing You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

Authors: 
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Routine Radiologic Assessment for Anastomotic Leak Is Not Necessary in Asymptomatic Patients After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Hansol Kang; Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Ryan M Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Vascular calcification does not predict anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Jefferies; Emily Evans; James Bundred; James Hodson; John L Whiting; Colm Forde; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-07-27

Review 6.  Understanding Complete Pathologic Response in Oesophageal Cancer: Implications for Management and Survival.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; E T Hurley; J P Hurley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: An up-to-date literature review.

Authors:  Antonios Athanasiou; Mairead Hennessy; Eleftherios Spartalis; Benjamin H L Tan; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.