Literature DB >> 25666717

Long-term prognostic effect of coronary atherosclerotic burden: validation of the computed tomography-Leaman score.

Saima Mushtaq1, Pedro De Araujo Gonçalves1, Hector M Garcia-Garcia1, Gianluca Pontone1, Antonio L Bartorelli1, Erika Bertella1, Carlos M Campos1, Mauro Pepi1, Patrick W Serruys1, Daniele Andreini2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography-adapted Leaman score (CT-LeSc) was developed to quantify coronary CT angiography information about atherosclerotic burden (lesion localization, stenosis degree, and plaque composition). The objective of the study is to evaluate CT-LeSc long-term prognostic value in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Single-center prospective registry including 1304 consecutive patients undergoing coronary CT angiography for suspected CAD. High CT-LeSc was defined by upper tertile (score, >5) cutoff. Segment involvement score and segment stenosis score were also evaluated. Hard cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal acute coronary syndromes) were considered for analysis. Different Cox regression models were used to identify independent event predictors. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival was evaluated in 4 patient subgroups stratified by obstructive (≥50% stenosis) versus nonobstructive CAD and a high (>5) versus a low (≤5) CT-LeSc. Of 1196 patients included in the final analysis (mean follow-up of 52±22 months), 125 patients experienced 136 hard events (18 cardiac deaths and 118 nonfatal myocardial infarction). All atherosclerotic burden scores were independent predictors of cardiac events (hazard ratios of 3.09 for segment involvement score, 4.42 for segment stenosis score, and 5.39 for CT-LeSc). Cumulative event-free survival was 76.8% with a high CT-LeSc and 96.0% with a low CT-LeSc. Event-free survival in nonobstructive CAD with high CT-LeSc (78.6%) was similar to obstructive CAD with high CT-LeSc (76.5%) but lower than obstructive CAD with low CT-LeSc (80.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: CT-LeSc is an independent long-term predictor of hard cardiac events. Patients with nonobstructive CAD and high CT-LeSc had hard event-free survival similar to patients with obstructive CAD.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; coronary artery disease; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25666717     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  28 in total

Review 1.  Impact of plaque characteristics on the degree of functional stenosis.

Authors:  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector Manuel Garcia-Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  Cardiac CT Imaging of Plaque Vulnerability: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Subclinical atherosclerosis detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography in Qatar: a comparison between Qataris and south Asian migrants.

Authors:  Joshua Schulman-Marcus; Ran Heo; Heidi Gransar; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Maryam Alkuwari; Kimberly Elmore; Mille J Gomez; Amin Jayyousi; Mahmoud Zirie; James K Min; Jessica M Peña
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Plaque imaging with CT-a comprehensive review on coronary CT angiography based risk assessment.

Authors:  Márton Kolossváry; Bálint Szilveszter; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10

5.  Quantification of coronary atherosclerotic burden with coronary computed tomography angiography: adapted Leaman score in Croatian patients.

Authors:  Petar Medakovic; Zrinka Biloglav; Ivan Padjen; Ivan Pristas; Mladen Jukic; Franko Zuvela; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic; Tena Jukic; Lana Turk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Patients with Known and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: What is in it for the Interventional Cardiologist?

Authors:  Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo; Roxana Campisi; Patricia Carrascosa
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction in women with nonobstructive ischemic heart disease as assessed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Roxana Campisi; Fernando D Marengo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

8.  Clinical risk factors and atherosclerotic plaque extent to define risk for major events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the long-term coronary computed tomography angiography CONFIRM registry.

Authors:  Alexander R van Rosendael; A Maxim Bax; Jeff M Smit; Inge J van den Hoogen; Xiaoyue Ma; Subhi Al'Aref; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Daniele Andreini; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin DeLago; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Philipp A Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon A Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Ronen Rubinshtein; Todd C Villines; Heidi Gransar; Yao Lu; Jessica M Peña; Fay Y Lin; Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Plaque assessment by coronary CT.

Authors:  Bálint Szilveszter; Csilla Celeng; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cardiac CT vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert Recommendations.

Authors:  Amir Ali Rahsepar; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.