Literature DB >> 25666665

Role of percutaneous needle core biopsy in diagnosis and clinical management of renal masses.

Rong Hu1, Celina Montemayor-Garcia2, Kasturi Das3.   

Abstract

Percutaneous needle core biopsies are routinely performed for renal mass diagnosis in some institutions. Because of limited tissue availability, accurate diagnosis can be challenging, and the role of needle core biopsy (NCB) remains debatable in kidney tumor management. In the present study, we reported our experience in diagnosing renal masses via percutaneous NCB and the role it plays in clinical management of these masses. We studied 301 consecutive cases of percutaneous NCBs performed for 280 renal masses from 269 patients between year 2008 and 2011 by reviewing final pathology diagnosis, hematoxylin and eosin slides, and ancillary studies. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing biopsy and nephrectomy diagnoses in a subset of renal masses. Clinical data including demographic information, clinical presentation, radiographic findings, and treatment information were reviewed subsequently if available. The size of renal masses in our study cohort ranged from 0.5 to 24 cm, and 78% of them were small renal masses. Definite diagnoses were rendered in 89% of the renal masses by NCBs, and 23% of them were benign. Renal mass NCB was 100% accurate in diagnosing primary renal malignancy and 93% accurate in determining histologic subtypes. Clinical management was analyzed for 180 renal masses. There was significant difference in clinical management between different diagnostic groups. We conclude that percutaneous NCB is a powerful tool not only for definite tissue diagnosis of renal masses before treatment but also plays an important role in guiding patient management and obtaining material for future molecular studies for targeted therapies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Management; Percutaneous needle core biopsy; Renal mass; Single institution study

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25666665     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  4 in total

Review 1.  Treatment approaches to small renal masses in patients of advanced age (≥75 years).

Authors:  Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Serkan Altınova; Ali Atan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07

2.  Does Computed Tomography Still Have Limitations to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors for Radiologists?

Authors:  Toshitaka Shin; Vinay A Duddalwar; Osamu Ukimura; Toru Matsugasumi; Frank Chen; Nariman Ahmadi; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Hiromitsu Mimata; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Percutaneous biopsy of small renal mass: can diagnostic accuracy be affected by hospital volume?

Authors:  Matteo Ferrari; Roberto Cartolari; Jessica Barizzi; Ricardo Pereira Mestre; Eugenia D'Antonio; Julien Renard
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-07-07

4.  FOXC2 and CLIP4 : a potential biomarker for synchronous metastasis of ≤7-cm clear cell renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Jinwoo Ahn; Kyung Seok Han; Jun Hyeok Heo; Duhee Bang; You Hyun Kang; Hyun A Jin; Sung Joon Hong; Ji Hyun Lee; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.