Literature DB >> 25666469

A multicentre evaluation of the autograft procedure for young patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: update on the German Ross Registry†.

Hans-Hinrich Sievers1, Ulrich Stierle2, Efstratios I Charitos2, Johanna J M Takkenberg3, Jürgen Hörer4, Rüdiger Lange4, Ulrich Franke5, Marc Albert5, Armin Gorski6, Rainer G Leyh6, Arlindo Riso7, Jörg Sachweh7, Anton Moritz8, Roland Hetzer9, Wolfgang Hemmer10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) in young, active patients represents a suboptimal solution in terms of long-term survival, durability and quality of life. The aim of the present work is to present an update on the multicentre experience with the pulmonary autograft procedure in young, adult patients.
METHODS: Between 1990-2013, 1779 adult patients (1339 males; 44.7 ± 11.6 years) underwent the pulmonary autograft procedure in 8 centres. All patients underwent prospective clinical and echocardiographic examinations annually. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.1 years (range 0-24.3 years) with a total cumulative follow-up of 14 288 years and 662 patients having a follow-up of at least 10 years.
RESULTS: The early (30-day) mortality rate was 1.1% (n = 19). Late (>30 day) survival of the adult population was comparable with the age- and gender-matched general population (observed deaths: 101, expected deaths: 91; P = 0.29). Freedom from autograft reoperation at 5, 10 and 15 years was 96.8, 94.7 and 86.7%, respectively, whereas freedom from homograft reoperation was 97.6, 95.5 and 92.3%, respectively. The overall freedom from reoperation was 94.9, 91.1 and 82.7%, respectively. Longitudinal modelling of functional valve performance revealed a low (<5%) probability of a patient being in higher autograft regurgitation grades throughout the first decade. Similarly, excellent homograft function was observed throughout the first 15 years.
CONCLUSION: The autograft principle results in postoperative long-term survival comparable with that of the age- and gender-matched general population and reoperation rates within the 1%/patient-year boundaries and should be considered in young, active patients who want to avoid the shortcomings of conventional prostheses.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; Homograft; Pulmonary autograft; Ross procedure; Valve surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25666469     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  22 in total

1.  Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Rodolfo V Rocha; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Maral Ouzounian; Bobby Yanagawa; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  The use of allogenic and autologous tissue to treat aortic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Mario Lusini; Antonio Nenna; Ivancarmine Gambardella; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  The Ross procedure: time for a hard look at current practices and a reexamination of the guidelines.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Ismail Bouhout
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

4.  Wall stresses of early remodeled pulmonary autografts.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Edgardo Alonso; Alexander Emmott; Zhongjie Wang; Shalni Kumar; Francois-Pierre Mongeon; Richard L Leask; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults.

Authors:  William H Ryan; John J Squiers; Katherine B Harrington; Tammy Goodenow; Courtney Rawitscher; Justin M Schaffer; J Michael DiMaio; William T Brinkman
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

6.  The Ross procedure in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Morgan K Moroi; Emile A Bacha; David M Kalfa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in adults undergoing the Ross procedure.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Joshua H De Bono; Benjamin Muston; Nivedita Rattan; David H Tian; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Peter Skillington
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

8.  Ross operation after failure of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Karen B Abeln; Vincent Chauvette; Nancy Poirier; Shunsuke Matsushima; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

9.  Outcome of 40 consecutive cases of modified Ross procedure using novel Dacron valved conduit.

Authors:  Lakshmi Kumari Sankhyan; Rajarshi Ghosh; Santosh Kumar; Sujoy Chatterjee; Sudipta Bhattachariya; Saurabhi Das; Hemant Kumar Nayak; Satyajit Bose; Srirup Chatterjee
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-23

10.  Long-term outcomes after the paediatric Ross and Ross-Konno procedures.

Authors:  Johanna Schlein; Barbara Elisabeth Ebner; Ralf Geiger; Paul Simon; Gregor Wollenek; Anton Moritz; Andreas Gamillscheg; Eva Base; Günther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.