BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.
BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.
Authors: Shiela M Strauss; Ashley E Jensen; Katelyn Bennett; Nicole Skursky; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Susan L Norris; Phyllis J Nichols; Carl J Caspersen; Russell E Glasgow; Michael M Engelgau; Leonard Jack; George Isham; Susan R Snyder; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Sanford Garfield; Peter Briss; David McCulloch Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Scott E Sherman; John Fotiades; Lisa V Rubenstein; Stuart C Gilman; Susan Vivell; Edmund Chaney; Elizabeth M Yano; Bradford Felker Journal: Acad Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Gbenga Ogedegbe; William Chaplin; Antoinette Schoenthaler; David Statman; David Berger; Tabia Richardson; Erica Phillips; Jacqueline Spencer; John P Allegrante Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Gala True; Anneliese E Butler; Bozena G Lamparska; Michele L Lempa; Judy A Shea; David A Asch; Rachel M Werner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sandra Wittleder; Adefunke Ajenikoko; Dylaney Bouwman; Yixin Fang; M Diane McKee; Paul Meissner; Stephanie L Orstad; Colin D Rehm; Scott E Sherman; Shea Smith; Victoria Sweat; Lorena Velastegui; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Melanie Jay Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Parya Saberi; Marie C D Stoner; Kristin Ming; Nadra E Lisha; J Carlo Hojilla; Hyman M Scott; Albert Y Liu; Wayne T Steward; Mallory O Johnson; Torsten B Neilands Journal: AIDS Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Catherine P Kaminetzky; Lauren A Beste; Anne P Poppe; Daniel B Doan; Howard K Mun; Nancy Fugate Woods; Joyce E Wipf Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Brian E Dixon; Katherine Barboza; Ashley E Jensen; Katelyn J Bennett; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Nadia Islam; Thomas Gepts; Isaac Lief; Radhika Gore; Natalie Levy; Michael Tanner; Yixin Fang; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Allison A Lewinski; Hayden B Bosworth; Karen M Goldstein; Jennifer M Gierisch; Shelley Jazowski; Felicia McCant; Courtney White-Clark; Valerie A Smith; Leah L Zullig Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-02-06