Literature DB >> 25665726

Cefepime free minimum concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration (fCmin/MIC) ratio predicts clinical failure in patients with Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia.

Samuel L Aitken1, Jerry Altshuler2, David J Guervil2, Elizabeth B Hirsch1, Luis L Ostrosky-Zeichner3, Charles D Ericsson3, Vincent H Tam4.   

Abstract

Cefepime is an antibiotic commonly used in nosocomial infections. The objective of this study was to elucidate the relationship between cefepime exposure and clinical outcome in patients with Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. A previously published population pharmacokinetic model of cefepime was validated in 12 adult patients with normal renal function by measuring plasma concentrations at steady-state. Additionally, clinical outcomes for 33 patients with Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia who received cefepime monotherapy were determined. The free minimum concentration (fCmin) to MIC ratio for each patient was determined by conditioning the validated pharmacokinetic model using patient-specific creatinine clearance (CLCr), dosing regimen and cefepime MIC of the organism isolated, and was subsequently correlated with clinical failure. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to determine the most significant drug exposure breakpoint. Mean±S.D. CLCr and cefepime Cmin in the 12 patients were 87.5±21.2mL/min and 6.2±3.8mg/L, respectively. In comparison, the Cmin predicted by the pharmacokinetic model was 5.8mg/L using a CLCr of 90mL/min. MICs of organisms ranged from 0.5mg/L to 8mg/L. Percent time free drug above MIC of 100% was achieved in 32/33 patients, but 12 patients experienced clinical failure. CART analysis determined patients with an fCmin/MIC≥2.1 had a significantly lower risk of clinical failure (OR=0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.67; P=0.017). The fCmin/MIC ratio is a useful predictor of clinical failure in Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. The clinical utility of fCmin/MIC in therapeutic drug monitoring should be further explored.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter; Clinical outcomes; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Pseudomonas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665726     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  16 in total

Review 1.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Cefepime Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Gideon Stitt; Jennifer Morris; Lindsay Schmees; Joseph Angelo; Ayse Akcan Arikan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Adequacy of high-dose cefepime regimen in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Fekade Bruck Sime; Michael S Roberts; Ing Soo Tiong; Julia H Gardner; Sheila Lehman; Sandra L Peake; Uwe Hahn; Morgyn S Warner; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Target-Controlled Infusion of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Stijn Jonckheere; Nikolaas De Neve; Jan Verbeke; Koen De Decker; Inger Brandt; An Boel; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Michel M R F Struys; Pieter J Colin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: an ASAP ECMO Study.

Authors:  Vesa Cheng; Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Fay Burrows; Hergen Buscher; Young-Jae Cho; Amanda Corley; Arne Diehl; Eileen Gilder; Stephan M Jakob; Hyung-Sook Kim; Bianca J Levkovich; Sung Yoon Lim; Shay McGuinness; Rachael Parke; Vincent Pellegrino; Yok-Ai Que; Claire Reynolds; Sam Rudham; Steven C Wallis; Susan A Welch; David Zacharias; John F Fraser; Kiran Shekar; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Too Much of a Good Thing: Defining Antimicrobial Therapeutic Targets to Minimize Toxicity.

Authors:  Kevin J Downes; Jennifer L Goldman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of High-Dose Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Obese Patients.

Authors:  John J Veillette; S Alexander Winans; Victoria K Maskiewicz; James Truong; Ronald N Jones; Steven C Forland
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.569

9.  Cefiderocol in Critically Ill Patients with Multi-Drug Resistant Pathogens: Real-Life Data on Pharmacokinetics and Microbiological Surveillance.

Authors:  Christina König; Anna Both; Holger Rohde; Stefan Kluge; Otto R Frey; Anka C Röhr; Dominic Wichmann
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28

10.  Failure of target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients and associated risk factors: a two-center prospective study (EXPAT).

Authors:  Alan Abdulla; Annemieke Dijkstra; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Henrik Endeman; Soma Bahmany; Tim M J Ewoldt; Anouk E Muller; Teun van Gelder; Diederik Gommers; Birgit C P Koch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.