Literature DB >> 25665678

Definition and Classification of Intraoperative Complications (CLASSIC): Delphi Study and Pilot Evaluation.

Rachel Rosenthal1, Henry Hoffmann, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Heiner C Bucher, Salome Dell-Kuster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardized reporting of intraoperative adverse events is important to enhance transparency. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated definition and classification of intraoperative complications.
METHODS: We conducted a two-round Delphi study to develop a definition and classification of intraoperative complications. Experts were contacted by email and sent a link to the online questionnaire. In a pilot study, two independent raters applied the definition and classification in a sample of 60 surgical interventions of low, intermediate, and high complexity and evaluated practicability. Interrater agreement of the classification was determined (raw categorical agreement, weighted kappa, and intraclass correlation).
RESULTS: In the Delphi study, 40 of 52 experts (77 % return rate) from 14 countries took part in each round. The Delphi study resulted in a comprehensive definition of intraoperative complications as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course occurring between skin incision and skin closure. The classification foresees four grades depending on the need for treatment (no need, grade I; need for treatment, grade II) and the severity of the complication (life-threatening/permanent disability, grade III; death, grade IV). The pilot study showed good practicability (6 on a 7-point scale) and a high raw agreement of 87 %, a weighted kappa of 0.83 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.94] and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.73-0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: While the Delphi process enabled to develop definitions and classification of intraoperative complications by severity, further research including a multicentre international full-scale validation needs to be conducted with the ultimate goal to contribute to standardized reporting in surgical practice and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665678     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome.

Authors:  S B Pillai; A M van Rij; S Williams; I A Thomson; M J Putterill; S Greig
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

3.  Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery.

Authors:  J J Pomposelli; S K Gupta; D C Zacharoulis; R Landa; A Miller; R Nanda
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery.

Authors:  H P Klotz; D Candinas; A Platz; A Horvàth; D Dindo; R Schlumpf; F Largiadèr
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice.

Authors:  Rachel Rosenthal; Henry Hoffmann; Kerry Dwan; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Heiner C Bucher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Evolving provider payment models and patient access to innovative medical technology.

Authors:  Genia Long; Richard Mortimer; Geoffrey Sanzenbacher
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 9.  The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Authors:  J Bruce; E M Russell; J Mollison; Z H Krukowski
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies?

Authors:  Richard Edlin; Peter Hall; Klemens Wallner; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  23 in total

1.  Classification of Intraoperative Complications: Reply.

Authors:  Salome Dell-Kuster; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Heiner C Bucher; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Classification of Intraoperative Complications.

Authors:  Haytham M A Kaafarani; George C Velmahos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Adverse Events in the Operating Room: Definitions, Prevalence, and Characteristics. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James J Jung; Jonah Elfassy; Peter Jüni; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Surgical teaching does not increase the risk of intraoperative adverse events.

Authors:  Basile Pache; Fabian Grass; Nicolas Fournier; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The Impact of the Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Program in an Entire Health System: A Natural Experiment in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Zaina AlBalawi; Leah Gramlich; Gregg Nelson; Peter Senior; Erik Youngson; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  [Better apprehension of errors in the early clinical treatment of the severely injured].

Authors:  H Trentzsch; S Imach; T Kohlmann; B Urban; L Lazarovici; S Prückner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Claudio Fiorillo; Giuseppe Quero; Roberta Menghi; Caterina Cina; Vito Laterza; Davide De Sio; Fabio Longo; Sergio Alfieri
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-10

8.  Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Aliseda; C Sanchez-Justicia; G Zozaya; J Lujan; A Almeida; N Blanco; P Martí-Cruchaga; F Rotellar
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Impact of Perioperative Complications on Living Kidney Donor Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Carlos Garcia-Ochoa; Liane S Feldman; Chris Nguan; Mauricio Monroy-Caudros; Jennifer B Arnold; Lianne Barnieh; Neil Boudville; Meaghan S Cuerden; Christine Dipchand; John S Gill; Martin Karpinski; Scott Klarenbach; Greg Knoll; Charmaine E Lok; Matthew Miller; G V Ramesh Prasad; Jessica M Sontrop; Leroy Storsley; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-08-11

10.  Adverse intraoperative events during surgical repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  William R Muirhead; Patrick J Grover; Ahmed K Toma; Danail Stoyanov; Hani J Marcus; Mary Murphy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.