Literature DB >> 25665673

Survival Outcome Between Hepatic Resection and Transarterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma More Than 10 cm: A Propensity Score Model.

Yi-Chia Chan1, Catherine S Kabiling, Vinod G Pillai, Gustavo Aguilar, Chih-Chi Wang, Chao-Long Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) larger than ten cm belonging to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B and C may benefit from hepatic resection (HR), compared to presently recommended management by transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib, respectively. This study reviews survival outcomes in such patients treated at a tertiary level hospital in Taiwan, and compares survival advantage of surgical resection over embolization therapy using a statistically valid propensity scores matching model.
METHODS: 192 patients newly diagnosed with HCC ≥ 10 cm between 2005 and 2010, who had HR (n = 104) and transarterial embolization (TAE) (n = 88), were retrospectively studied. Thirty-two patients in each group were selected by propensity scores matching model for comparison.
RESULTS: Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of patients in BCLC stage B who had HR and TAE were 78.5, 61.4, 54.2% and 30, 12.9, 12.9%, (p < 0.001), respectively. For stage C, survival rates were 77.8, 56.4, and 47% at 1, 3, 5 years in HR group, while it was 12.7% at 1 year in TAE group, (p < 0.001). Propensity score-based analysis showed estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients receiving HR and TAE were 90.2 versus 26.4%, 64.3 versus 3.3%, and 51.5 versus 3.3%, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: HR had significantly better 5 year survival than TAE for patients with HCC ≥ 10 cm in the propensity score model. Overall survival of BCLC stage B may be improved by considering HR as first treatment option for resectable large HCCs, provided patient is fit for surgery with good liver remnant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665673     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2975-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

1.  EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  J-L Raoul; B Sangro; A Forner; V Mazzaferro; F Piscaglia; L Bolondi; R Lencioni
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Chemoembolization for intermediate HCC: is there proof of survival benefit?

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Asian consensus workshop report: expert consensus guideline for the management of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia.

Authors:  Kwang-Hyub Han; Masatochi Kudo; Sheng-Long Ye; Jong Young Choi; Roonni Tung-Ping Poon; Jinsil Seong; Joong-Won Park; Takafumi Ichida; Jin Wook Chung; Pierce Chow; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  How to improve the outcome in patients with AJCC stage I hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony Q Yap; Carlos A Millan; Jing-Houng Wang; Chih-Chi Wang; Sen-Nan Lu; Shih-Ho Wang; Chih-Che Lin; Yueh-Wei Liu; Chee-Chien Yong; Wei-Feng Li; Ting-Lung Lin; Chao-Long Chen
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Prognostic factors of solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma: the importance of differentiation grade.

Authors:  L Zhou; J-A Rui; S-B Wang; S-G Chen; Q Qu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Applicability of BCLC stage for prognostic stratification in comparison with other staging systems: single centre experience from long-term clinical outcomes of 1717 treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Beom Kyung Kim; Seung Up Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Mi Sung Park; Eun Hye Kim; Jinsil Seong; Do Youn Lee; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Selection criteria for hepatic resection in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 10.  Safety and efficacy of partial hepatectomy for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yan-Ming Zhou; Bin Li; Dong-Hui Xu; Jia-Mei Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Central Hepatectomy Still Plays an Important Role in Treatment of Early-Stage Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chun-Han Chen; Tzu-Hao Huang; Cheng-Chih Chang; Wei-Feng Li; Ting-Lung Lin; Chih-Chi Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Zamora-Valdes; Timucin Taner; David M Nagorney
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 3.  Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma-Western versus Eastern attitude.

Authors:  Flavia Neri; Lorenzo Maroni; Matteo Ravaioli
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.