Literature DB >> 25665670

CUP Syndrome in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Analysis of Risk Factors and Impact of Surgical Intervention.

Nehara Begum1, Ulrich Wellner, Christoph Thorns, Georg Brabant, Martin Hoffmann, Conny Georg Bürk, Hendrik Lehnert, Tobias Keck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) with unknown primary site (NEN-CUP tumors) may have a poor prognosis. We evaluated the clinical presentation, therapy, outcome, and risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients who had these tumors.
METHODS: In 243 patients who had NEN, a retrospective review was performed in 38 patients who had NEN-CUP tumors. The 38 patients who had NEN-CUP tumors were evaluated in three groups: group 1 (surgery; primary tumor detected; ten patients); group 2 (surgery; no primary tumor detected; ten patients); and group 3 (no surgery; 18 patients). Risk factors were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Most patients who had NEN-CUP tumors [32 patients (84%)] had World Health Organization (WHO) performance score of 0 or 1, and most tumors [24 patients (63%)] were well differentiated (WHO grade, G1 or G2; Ki-67 index, ≤20%). Univariate analysis showed that greater survival was significantly associated with lower patient age, lower WHO performance score, lower WHO grade, lower number of metastatic sites, treatment with surgery, and no treatment with chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that low WHO performance score (hazard ratio 7.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-22.19) and treatment with surgery (hazard ratio 0.10, CI 0.028-0.381) were significant independent predictors of improved survival.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NEN-CUP tumors, surgical treatment is an independent predictor of better survival. Therefore, surgical treatment may be indicated in patients with good general health status and well-differentiated NEN-CUP tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665670     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2963-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

1.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary.

Authors:  Marianne Pavel; Eric Baudin; Anne Couvelard; Eric Krenning; Kjell Öberg; Thomas Steinmüller; Martin Anlauf; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ramon Salazar
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.914

2.  Surgery increases survival in patients with gastrinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Norton; Douglas L Fraker; H R Alexander; Fathia Gibril; David J Liewehr; David J Venzon; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary: a systematic review of the literature and a comparative study with other neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Aikaterini Stoyianni; George Pentheroudakis; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Inhibition of subcutaneously growing line 1 carcinomas due to metastatic spread.

Authors:  J M Yuhas; N H Pazmiño
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Cancer of unknown primary site.

Authors:  Nicholas Pavlidis; George Pentheroudakis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE).

Authors:  R Garcia-Carbonero; J Capdevila; G Crespo-Herrero; J A Díaz-Pérez; M P Martínez Del Prado; V Alonso Orduña; I Sevilla-García; C Villabona-Artero; A Beguiristain-Gómez; M Llanos-Muñoz; M Marazuela; C Alvarez-Escola; D Castellano; E Vilar; P Jiménez-Fonseca; A Teulé; J Sastre-Valera; M Benavent-Viñuelas; A Monleon; R Salazar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Cancer metastasis: a product of tumor-host interactions.

Authors:  E V Sugarbaker
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours in relation to the extent of hepatic disease.

Authors:  A Frilling; J Li; E Malamutmann; K-W Schmid; A Bockisch; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Curative and palliative surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract.

Authors:  Peter E Goretzki; Martina T Mogl; Aycan Akca; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  An abdominal wall neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivia Jagiella-Lodise; Valerie Jagiella; Evan Weitman
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.