S Amatachaya1, W Pramodhyakul1, P Wattanapan2, W Eungpinichpong3. 1. 1] School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand [2] Improvement of Physical Performance and Quality of Life (IPQ) Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. 2. 1] Improvement of Physical Performance and Quality of Life (IPQ) Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand [2] Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. 3. 1] School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand [2] Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance (BNOJPH), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A 6-month prospective design. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between ability of obstacle crossing and falls in independent ambulatory participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: A tertiary rehabilitation center. METHODS: Ninety-four participants were evaluated for their SCI characteristics, ability of walking over small obstacles and functional ability relating to dynamic balance control, lower-extremity motor strength (LEMS) and walking ability. Their fall data were then prospectively monitored every month for 6 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants failed in obstacle crossing. However, only eight of the thirty-three participants who fell during the follow-up period were unable to clear the obstacle while walking. The LEMS and functional ability of the participants who failed were significantly poorer than those of individuals who passed an obstacle-crossing test (P⩽0.001). For the falls, significant differences between the groups were found only in age and tactile scores. The findings further indicated that failures on obstacle crossing were not significantly associated with falls (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Ability of obstacle crossing in a closed/controlled environment clearly correlated with intrinsic causes, whereas a fall in an open environment may be associated with not only intrinsic but also extrinsic causes. Therefore, apart from functional ability, rehabilitation professionals may need to consider extrinsic factors around falls in order to manage risk of injury to the patients.
STUDY DESIGN: A 6-month prospective design. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between ability of obstacle crossing and falls in independent ambulatory participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: A tertiary rehabilitation center. METHODS: Ninety-four participants were evaluated for their SCI characteristics, ability of walking over small obstacles and functional ability relating to dynamic balance control, lower-extremity motor strength (LEMS) and walking ability. Their fall data were then prospectively monitored every month for 6 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants failed in obstacle crossing. However, only eight of the thirty-three participants who fell during the follow-up period were unable to clear the obstacle while walking. The LEMS and functional ability of the participants who failed were significantly poorer than those of individuals who passed an obstacle-crossing test (P⩽0.001). For the falls, significant differences between the groups were found only in age and tactile scores. The findings further indicated that failures on obstacle crossing were not significantly associated with falls (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Ability of obstacle crossing in a closed/controlled environment clearly correlated with intrinsic causes, whereas a fall in an open environment may be associated with not only intrinsic but also extrinsic causes. Therefore, apart from functional ability, rehabilitation professionals may need to consider extrinsic factors around falls in order to manage risk of injury to the patients.
Authors: Marca L Sipski; Amie B Jackson; Orlando Gómez-Marín; Irene Estores; Adam Stein Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Amie B Jackson; Charles T Carnel; John F Ditunno; Mary Schmidt Read; Michael L Boninger; Mark R Schmeler; Steve R Williams; William H Donovan Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Alia Khan; Clara Pujol; Mark Laylor; Nikola Unic; Maureen Pakosh; Jaclyn Dawe; Kristin E Musselman Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Hardeep Singh; Jaya Sam; Mary C Verrier; Heather M Flett; B Catharine Craven; Kristin E Musselman Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2018-01-18