Literature DB >> 25665083

On the independence of visual awareness and metacognition: a signal detection theoretic analysis.

Barbara Jachs1, Manuel J Blanco2, Sarah Grantham-Hill1, David Soto.   

Abstract

Classically, visual awareness and metacognition are thought to be intimately linked, with our knowledge of the correctness of perceptual choices (henceforth metacognition) being dependent on the level of stimulus awareness. Here we used a signal detection theoretic approach involving a Gabor orientation discrimination task in conjunction with trial-by-trial ratings of perceptual awareness and response confidence in order to gauge estimates of type-1 (perceptual) orientation sensitivity and type-2 (metacognitive) sensitivity at different levels of stimulus awareness. Data from three experiments indicate that while the level of stimulus awareness had a profound impact on type-1 perceptual sensitivity, the awareness effect on type-2 metacognitive sensitivity was far lower by comparison. The present data pose a challenge for signal detection theoretic models in which both type-1 (perceptual) and type-2 (metacognitive) processes are assumed to operate on the same input. More broadly, the findings challenge the commonly held view that metacognition is tightly coupled to conscious states. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665083     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

Review 1.  The methodological puzzle of phenomenal consciousness.

Authors:  Ian Phillips
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The role of metacognition in recognition of the content of statistical learning.

Authors:  Mikhail Ordin; Leona Polyanskaya
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

3.  Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Chiara F Tagliabue; Domenica Veniero; Roberto Cecere; Silvia Savazzi; Gregor Thut
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-12

4.  Sensitivity vs. awareness curve: A novel model-based analysis to uncover the processes underlying nonconscious perception.

Authors:  Ali Pournaghdali; Bennett L Schwartz; Jason Hays; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

5.  Who's afraid of response bias?

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Tony Ro; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2016-02-27

6.  Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively.

Authors:  Marta Siedlecka; Borysław Paulewicz; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-19

8.  Self-Knowledge Dim-Out: Stress Impairs Metacognitive Accuracy.

Authors:  Gabriel Reyes; Jaime R Silva; Karina Jaramillo; Lucio Rehbein; Jérôme Sackur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interocular suppression prevents interference in a flanker task.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Jonathan T H Lo Voi; Thomas Y Lee; Melissa-Ann Mackie; Yanhong Wu; Jin Fan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11

10.  Learning and Recognition of a Non-conscious Sequence of Events in Human Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Clive R Rosenthal; Samantha K Andrews; Chrystalina A Antoniades; Christopher Kennard; David Soto
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.