Literature DB >> 25664424

Hospital-based trends in penile prosthetic surgery.

Hossein S Mirheydar1, Kerrin L Palazzi, J Kellogg Parsons, David Chang, Tung-Chin Hsieh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We examined national and regional trends in hospital-based penile prosthetic surgery and identified patient-specific factors predicting receipt of inflatable vs. semi-rigid penile prostheses. AIMS: To improve our understanding of the surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED).
METHODS: We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2010 in the United States and the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database from 1995 to 2010. Total number of penile implants performed and proportions of inflatable vs. semi-rigid prosthesis were examined. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to identify factors associated with selection of inflatable vs. semi-rigid prostheses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure is the total number of hospital-based penile prosthetic surgeries performed in the United States over a 12-year period (1998-2010). Secondary outcome measures include proportion of inflatable and semi-rigid prosthesis implantations and factors influencing receipt of different prostheses.
RESULTS: We identified 53,967 penile prosthetic surgeries in the NIS; annual number implanted decreased from 4,703 to 2,338. Inflatable prostheses incurred higher costs but had a similar length of stay (LOS). In MVA, Caucasian race, Peyronie's disease, and private insurance were independently associated with receipt of an inflatable prosthesis. We identified 7,054 penile prostheses in OSHPD; annual number implanted decreased from 760 to 318. The proportion of inflatable prostheses increased significantly from 78.4% to 88.4% between 2001 and 2010. Inflatable prostheses incurred higher costs but had similar median LOS. In MVA, Caucasians and men without spinal cord injury were more likely to receive inflatable prosthesis.
CONCLUSION: Hospital-based penile prosthetic surgery has decreased substantially both nationwide and in California. In the United States, Caucasian race, Peyronie's disease, and private insurance were independently associated with receipt of an inflatable penile prosthesis. California population data correlated with national trends and can be utilized to further study surgical management of ED.
© 2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthetic Surgery; Population Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25664424     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  4 in total

Review 1.  Penile Implant Considerations in the Bladder Cancer Survivor.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Loh-Doyle
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.

Authors:  Vinson M Wang; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 3.  A narrative review of the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients undergoing penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Lexiaochuan Wen; Tobias S Köhler; Sevann Helo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 4.  Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Jose A Saavedra-Belaunde; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.